Exploration of Practice Teaching Reform Based on Outcome-Based Education Concept: Taking Environmental Design Major as an Example
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Outcome-based education (OBE) concept
Practice teaching system
Teaching reform
Environmental design

DOI

10.26689/jcer.v8i5.6935

Submitted : 2024-05-24
Accepted : 2024-06-08
Published : 2024-06-23

Abstract

The concept of OBE (outcome-based education) is more focused on designing and implementing teaching activities around expected learning outcomes than the traditional teaching model and enhancing the quality of education through clear and measurable learning outcomes, which has led to profound changes in the field of education. However, environmental design practice teaching faces a series of challenges in the implementation of the OBE concept, including the complexity of the assessment system, personalized learning and creative learning, and over-reliance on quantitative assessment. Therefore, in order to further deepen the professionalization of the OBE concept, we have conducted research on the design education practice models at home and abroad, explored the practice teaching models and their applications such as project system, studio model, practical internships, and technology-driven interdisciplinary integration, and took the practice innovative teaching models of Stanford d.school and Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) as examples to explore the characteristics of the curricula, cultivation modes, and the development of the environmental design professional practice teaching model. The characteristics of OBE and RISD are discussed to provide a global vision and local contextual reference for the practice teaching reform of environmental design majors.

References

Lu P, Zhai X, 2022, Research on Cultivation and Enhancement of Academic Ability of Design Graduate Students Based on OBE Concept. Packaging Engineering, 43(S1): 387–390 + 407.

Zhou W, Zhou Y, 2021, Teaching Reform and Innovative Practice of Packaging Design Course. Packaging Engineering, 42(S1): 261–266.

Bai Y, 2018, The Direction and Inspiration of STEAM Education in Stanford University. Science and Technology in Chinese Colleges and Universities, 2018(11): 60–62.

Wu Z, Miao D, Yan H, 2021, Analysis and Revelation of STEM Curriculum Design Under the Concept of Design Thinking—Taking the REDlab STEM Program of Stanford University School of Design as an Example. Shanghai Education Research, 2021(06): 71–76.

Chen P, Huang R, 2019, What Does Design Thinking Bring?—Based on the Analysis of Literature Related to WOS Core Database from 2000–2018. Research on Modern Distance Education, 31(06): 102–111.

Chen P, Tian Y, Huang R, 2019, Research and Insights on STEM Education Innovative Curriculum Based on Design Thinking—An Example of Stanford University’s d.loft STEM Program. China Electrochemical Education, 2019(08): 82–90.