Keywords
Students in difficulty
Education policies
Submitted : 2024-04-16
Accepted : 2024-05-01
Published : 2024-05-16
Abstract
Some French public middle schools offer gifted students the opportunity to pursue their education in general classes, while benefiting from specific facilities within the framework of a dedicated educational program. In this study, we sought to identify and analyze the needs of these students as perceived by the headmaster of each middle school involved. The results highlight two main student needs, common to all these programs (uneasiness and difficulties in peer relationships) as well as needs specifically mentioned by some headmasters (non-adaptive behavior).
References
Liratni M, Pry R, 2012, Psychometric Profiles of 60 High Potential Children at WISC IV. Pratiques Psychologiques, 18(1): 63–74.
Lautrey J, 2004, Introduction: High Potentials and Talents: The Current Position of the Problem. Psychologie Française, 49(3): 219–232.
Pereira-Fradin M, Caroff X, Jacquet AY, 2010, Does the WISC-IV Improve the Identification of High Potential Children? Enfance, 2010(1): 11–26.
Pereira-Fradin M, Jouffray C, 2006, Children with High Potential at School: History and Current Issues. Bulletin de Psychologie, 59(5): 431–437.
Lautrey J, Vrignaud P, 2006, Methods of Schooling Intellectually Precocious Children,” in Lubart T, (ed.), Exceptional Children: Intellectual Precocity, High Potential and Talent, Bréal, Rosny-sous-Bois, 219–247.
Reis SM, Mccoach DB, 2000, The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3): 152–169.
Courtinat-Camps A, 2010, Family Socialization, Self-Esteem and School Experience Among High-Potential Middle School Students. Pratiques Psychologiques, 16(4): 319–335.
Delaubier JP, 2002, The Schooling of “Intellectually Precocious” Students, Rapport au Ministre de l’Éducation Nationale, Paris.
Pourtois JP, Desmet H, Leheut MF, 2005, The Schooling of the Child, of the Adolescent with High Potential, in Bergonnier-Dupuy G, (ed.), The Child, Actor and/or Subject Within the Family, Erès, Ramonville St Agne, 77–90.
Revol O, Poulin R, Perrodin D, 2015, 100 Ideas to Support Children with High Potential: Let’s Change Our Outlook on These Children with Specific Needs in order to Promote Their Development, Éditions Tom Pousse, Paris.
Santilli P, 2018, Intercantonal Study on the Academic Satisfaction of Students with High Intellectual Potential. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l’Enfant, 154(24/4): 319–238.
Parisot C, Daoudi A, Blanc R, 2007, The Paradoxical Academic Difficulties of Gifted Children. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l’Enfant, 2007(92): 101–113.
Grégoire J, 2012, The Challenges of Identifying Children with High Potential. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l’Enfant, 2012(119): 419–424.
Terrassier JC, 1981, Gifted Children or Embarrassing Precocity, ESF Éditeur, Issy-les-Moulineaux.
Ministry of National Education (MEN), 2019, Enrolling a Student with High Potential, Ministry of National Education and Youth, C.
Dugruelle C, Le Guillou P, 2003, Assessment of Educational Experiences in Secondary Education on the Schooling of Intellectually Precocious Students, Report to the Ministry of Youth, National Education and Research, Paris.
Courtinat-Camps A, Toubert-Duffort D, 2014, Supporting the Schooling of Intellectually Precocious Children in Essonne, Unpublished document, INSHEA, Suresnes.
Barrère A, 2013, The Rise of Devices: A New Age of School Organization. Carrefours de l’éducation, 2013(36): 95–116.
Foucault M, 1994, Said and Written (1976–1979), Tome III, Gallimard, Paris.
Vincent G, 1980, French Primary School, Presses Universitaires de Lyon, Lyon.
Audran J, 2010, Devices and Situations: Contribution to the Anthropological and Communicational Study of Online Learning Environments in Higher Education, Accreditation to Direct Research, Paris Descartes University.
Peeters H, Charlier P, 1999, Contributions to a Theory of the Device. Hermès, La Revue, 1999(25): 15–23.
Tremblay P, 2010, Evaluation of the Quality of Two School Systems – Type 8 Specialized Education and Inclusion in Mainstream Education – Intended for Primary School Students with Learning Difficulties/Disabilities, Doctoral thesis, Université Libre from Brussels (Belgium).
Tremblay P, 2015, School Inclusion and Transformation of Schooling Systems for Students with Specific Needs. La Nouvelle Revue de l’Adaptation et de la Scolarisation, 2015(70–71): 51–65.
Bouchard C, Plante J, 2002, Quality: Better Define it to Better Measure it. Les Cahiers du Service de Pédagogie Expérimentale, 2002(11–12): 219–236.
De Ketele JM, Gérard FM, 2007, Quality and Management of the Education System, in Behrens M, (ed.), Quality in Education. To Reflect on the Training of Tomorrow, Presses de l'Université du Québec, Quebec, 19–38.
Roegiers X, 2007, Analyze an Education or Training Action: Analyze Education or Training Programs, Plans and Projects to Better Develop, Carry Out and Evaluate Them, De Boeck, Louvainla-Neuve.
Bourgeois E, 1991, Analysis of Training Needs in Organizations: A Theoretical and Methodological Model. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 14(1): 17–60.
Bardin L, 2013, Content Analysis, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Paillé P, Mucchielli A, 2016, Qualitative Analysis in Human and Social Sciences, Armand Colin (4e édition), Paris.
Ministry of the French Community of Belgium, 2001, Children and Adolescents with High Potential, Final Report of Inter-University Action Research (FUNDP, UCL, ULB., ULg, UMH), Brussels.
Courtinat A, 2008, School Experience and Self-Representations Among Middle School Students with High Intellectual Potential in Differentiated Schooling Contexts, Doctoral thesis, Université Toulouse 2.
Brasseur S, Cuche C, 2017, High Potential in Questions, Mardaga, Wavre.
Cuche C, Genicot AS, Goldschmid I, et al., 2010, School Engagement of Young People with High Potential: Role of Relationships with Teachers and Peers. Enfance, 2010(1): 111–128.
MEN and DGESCO, 2013, Personalization of Routes. Educational Support Resources. Schooling Intellectually Precocious Students (EIP), Ministry of National Education, Paris.
Gauvrit N, Vannetzel L, 2018, Conclusion. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l’Enfant, 2018(154): 333.
Coriat AR, 1987, Gifted Children: Psychodynamic and Theoretical Approach, Le Centurion, Paris.
Revol O, Louis J, Fourneret P, 2003, Behavioral Disorders in Early Children. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l’Enfant, 2003(73): 159–163.
Revol O, Louis J, Fourneret P, 2004, The Precocious Child: Particular Signs. Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence, 52(3): 148–153.
IGAS, IGEN, and IGAENR, 2018, Evaluation of the Operation of Therapeutic, Educational and Pedagogical Institutes as an Integrated System, and the Prospects for Extension, Report No. 2018-079.
Gauvrit N, Guez A, 2018, Academic and Professional Success of People with High Intellectual Potential. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l’Enfant, 2018(154): 313–318.
Liratni M, 2018, High Intellectual Potential and Psychopathologies: Reconciliatory Position and Therapeutic Avenues. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l’Enfant, 2018(154): 305–312.
Brasseur S, 2013, Study of the Functioning of Emotional Skills of Young People with High Intellectual Potential, Doctoral thesis, Catholic University of Louvain, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences (Belgium).