Keywords
Teacher support
Learning experience
Blended learning environment
Submitted : 2024-05-24
Accepted : 2024-06-08
Published : 2024-06-23
Abstract
Blended learning (BL) has been widely adopted to improve students’ academic achievements in higher education. However, its success relies mainly on student engagement, which plays an essential role in active learning and provides a rich understanding of students’ experiences. The study utilized three self-designed scales—the Teacher Support Scale, Student Engagement Scale, and Student Learning Experience Scale—to gauge and examine the impact and relationship between perceived teacher support, student behavioral engagement, and the intermediary role of learning experiences. A cohort of 899 college students undertaking the obligatory College English course through BL modes across five Chinese universities actively participated by completing a comprehensive questionnaire. The results showed significant correlations between perceived teacher support, learning experience, and behavioral engagement. Perceived teacher support significantly predicted students’ behavioral engagement, with socio-affective support exerting the most substantial predictive effects. All predictive effects were partially mediated by learning experience (learning mode, online resources, overall LMS-based learning, interaction with their instructor and peers, and learning outcome). The influence of perceived teacher support on behavioral engagement differed between students who reported the most positive (vs. negative) learning experiences. Suggestions for further research are offered for consideration.
References
Bruggeman B, Tondeur J, Struyven K, et al., 2021, Experts Speaking: Crucial Teacher Attributes for Implementing Blended Learning in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, (48): 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772
Kaleta R, Skibba K, Joosten T, 2007, Discovering, Designing, and Delivering Hybrid Courses, in Picciano AG, Dzuiban C, (eds.), Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, The Sloan Consortium, Needham, MA.
Garrison DR, Kanuka H, 2004, Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2): 95–105.
Salhab R, Daher W, 2023, University Students’ Engagement in Mobile Learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(1): 202–216.
Halverson LR, Graham CR, 2019, Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework. Online Learning, 23(2): 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
Manwaring KC, Larsen R, Graham CR, et al., 2017, Investigating Student Engagement in Blended Learning Settings Using Experience Sampling and Structural Equation Modeling. Internet and Higher Education, (35): 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002
Cents-Boonstra M, Lichtwarck-Aschoff A, Lara MM, et al., 2022, Patterns of Motivating Teaching Behaviour and Student Engagement: A Microanalytic Approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(1): 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00543-3
Henry KL, Knight KE, Thornberry TP, 2012, School Disengagement as a Predictor of Dropout, Delinquency, and Problem Substance Use During Adolescence and Early Adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, (41): 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9665-3
Zhou J, 2010, Impact of Engagement on the Academic Performance and Persistence of First-Year College Students at a Four-Year Public Institution, dissertation, The Florida State University.
Wang MT, Fredricks JA, 2014, The Reciprocal Links Between School Engagement, Youth Problem Behaviors, and School Dropout During Adolescence. Child Development, 85(2): 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
Kuh GD, 2009, The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Kuh GD, 2009, What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6): 683–706.
Gershenson S, 2016, Linking Teacher Quality, Student Attendance, and Student Achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 11(2): 125–149.
Werang B, Radja Leba SM, 2022, Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. The Qualitative Report, 27(2): 555–577. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165
Doo MY, Bonk CJ, Heo H, 2023, Examinations of the Relationships Between Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation, Teaching, Cognitive Presences, and Learning Engagement During COVID-19. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2): 481–504.
Yanbo W, Bazari NA, Anuar R, 2023, Theoretical Construction and Research Perspectives of Student Engagement in Foreign Language Education. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1): 133–146.
Hsu TC, Chang C, Jen TH, 2023, Artificial Intelligence Image Recognition Using Self-Regulation Learning Strategies: Effects on Vocabulary Acquisition, Learning Anxiety, and Learning Behaviours of English Language Learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2165508
Li J, Xue E, 2023, Dynamic Interaction Between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1): 59.
Rasheed MI, Malik MJ, Pitafi AH, et al., 2020, Usage of Social Media, Student Engagement, and Creativity: The Role of Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Cyberbullying. Computers & Education, (159): 104002.
Pellas N, 2014, The Influence of Computer Self-Efficacy, Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Self-Esteem on Student Engagement in Online Learning Programs: Evidence from the Virtual World of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, (35): 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048
Chen CH, Wu IC, 2012, The Interplay Between Cognitive and Motivational Variables in a Supportive Online Learning System for Secondary Physical Education. Computers & Education, 58(1): 542–550.
Guo J, 2018, Building Bridges to Student Learning: Perceptions of the Learning Environment, Engagement, and Learning Outcomes Among Chinese Undergraduates. Studies in Educational Evaluation, (59): 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.08.002
Cho MH, Castaneda DA, 2019, Motivational and Affective Engagement in Learning Spanish with a Mobile Application. System, (81): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.008
Lietaert S, Roorda D, Laevers F, et al., 2015, The Gender Gap in Student Engagement: The Role of Teachers’ Autonomy Support, Structure, and Involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4): 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12095
Tang CW, Jun Shi M, de Guzman AB, 2022, Lecturer Teaching Styles and Student Learning Involvement in Large Classes: A Taiwan Case Study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3): 447–463.
Xu W, Stahl G, 2023, Teaching Chinese with Chinese Characteristics: ‘Difficult’ Knowledge, Discomforting Pedagogies and Student Engagement. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(1): 57–73.
Tao Y, Meng Y, Gao Z, et al., 2022. Perceived Teacher Support, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(4): 401–420.
Roorda DL, Koomen HM, Spilt JL, et al., 2011, The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4): 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
Wang MT, Eccles JS, 2013, School Context, Achievement Motivation, and Academic Engagement: A Longitudinal Study of School Engagement Using a Multidimensional Perspective. Learning and Instruction, (28): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
Rajesh JI, Pare V, Rasel S, et al., 2023, Gamification: Teacher Proactive Support and Student Engagement During Covid-19 and Beyond, in Sultan P, (ed.), Innovation, Leadership and Governance in Higher Education, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7299-7_5
Skinner EA, Pitzer JR, 2012, Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience, in Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C, (eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer, US, 21–44. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Strati AD, Schmidt JA, Maier KS, 2017, Perceived Challenge, Teacher Support, and Teacher Obstruction as Predictors of Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1): 131–147.
Sadoughi M, Hejazi SY, 2022, The Effect of Teacher Support on Academic Engagement: The Serial Mediation of Learning Experience and Motivated Learning Behavior. Current Psychology, (42): 18858–18869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03045-7
Zeinstra L, Kupers E, Loopers J, et al., 2023, Real-Time Teacher-Student Interactions: The Dynamic Interplay Between Need Supportive Teaching and Student Engagement Over the Course of One School Year. Teaching and Teacher Education, (121): 103906.
Roorda DL, Jak S, Zee M, et al., 2017, Affective Teacher–Student Relationships and Students’ Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Update and Test of the Mediating Role of Engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3): 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3
Lei H, Cui Y, Zhou W, 2018, Relationships Between Student Engagement and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3): 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
Henry A, Thorsen C, 2021, Teachers’ Self-Disclosures and Influences on Students’ Motivation: A Relational Perspective. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1441261
Alexander B, Ashford-Rowe K, Barajas-Murphy N, et al., 2019, EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition, Educause, Louisville, CO, USA.
Veluvali P, Surisetti J, 2022, Learning Management System for Greater Learner Engagement in Higher Education—A Review. Higher Education for the Future, 9(1): 107–121.
Huang J, Matthews KE, Lodge JM, 2022, ‘The University Doesn’t Care About the Impact It Is Having on Us’: Academic Experiences of the Institutionalisation of Blended Learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5): 1557–1571.
Batista-Toledo S, Gavilan D, 2023, Student Experience, Satisfaction and Commitment in Blended Learning: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Mathematics, 11(3): 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030749
Hung HT, 2017, Design-Based Research: Redesign of an English Language Course Using a Flipped Classroom Approach. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1): 180–192.
Engin M, Donanci S, 2016, Instructional Videos as Part of a ‘Flipped’ Approach in Academic Writing. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 13(1): 73–80.
Kordt B, 2018, Affordance Theory and Multiple Language Learning and Teaching. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(2): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1223081
Draffan EA, Rainger P, 2006, A Model for the Identification of Challenges to Blended Learning. ALT-J, 14(1): 55–67.
Baragash RS, Al-Samarraie H, 2018, Blended Learning: Investigating the Influence of Engagement in Multiple Learning Delivery Modes on Students’ Performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7): 2082–2098.
Coates H, 2007, A Model of Online and General Campus-Based Student Engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2): 121–141.
Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH, 2004, School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1): 59–109.
Van Braak M, Van de Pol J, Poorthuis AM, et al., 2021, A Micro-Perspective on Students’ Behavioral Engagement in the Context of Teachers’ Instructional Support During Seatwork: Sources of Variability and the Role of Teacher Adaptive Support. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (64): 101928.
Martin AJ, Ginns P, Collie RJ, 2023, University Students in COVID-19 Lockdown: The Role of Adaptability and Fluid Reasoning in Supporting Their Academic Motivation and Engagement. Learning and Instruction, (83): 101712.
Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ, 2008, Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5): 369386.
Zhoc KCH, Webster BJ, King RB, et al., 2019, Higher Education Student Engagement Scale (HESES): Development and Psychometric Evidence. Research in Higher Education, (60): 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9510-6
Martin AJ, n.d., The Motivation and Engagement Scale, Lifelong Achievement Group (1999–2021), viewed July 8, 2023, https://lifelongachievement.com/pages/the-motivation-and-engagement-scale-mes
Krause KL, Coates H, 2008, Students’ Engagement in First-Year University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5): 493–505.
Tardy CH, 1985, Social Support Measurement. American Journal of Community Psychology, (13): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00905728
Doménech-Betoret F, Gómez-Artiga A, Abellán-Roselló L, et al., 2020, MOCSE Centered on Students: Validation of Learning Demands and Teacher Support Scales. Frontiers in Psychology, (11): 582926.
Zheng W, Yu F, Wu YJ, 2022, Social Media on Blended Learning: The Effect of Rapport and Motivation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(9): 1941–1951.
O’Flaherty J, Phillips C, 2015, The Use of Flipped Classrooms in Higher Education: A Scoping Review. The Internet and Higher Education, (25): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Bishop J, Verleger MA, 2013, The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
Chandra V, Watters JJ, 2012, Re-Thinking Physics Teaching with Web-Based Learning. Computers & Education, 58(1): 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.010
Bhagat KK, Cheng CH, Koneru I, et al., 2021, Students’ Blended Learning Course Experience Scale (BLCES): Development and Validation. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6): 3971–3981.
Santos AC, Arriaga P, Daniel JR, et al., 2023, Social and Emotional Competencies as Predictors of Student Engagement in Youth: A Cross-Cultural Multilevel Study. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1): 1–19.
Chiu TK, 2022, Applying the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to Explain Student Engagement in Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1): S14–S30.
Hsu HCK, Wang CV, Levesque-Bristol C, 2019, Reexamining the Impact of Self-Determination Theory on Learning Outcomes in the Online Learning Environment. Education and Information Technologies, (24): 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w
Buhl-Wiggers J, Kjærgaard A, Munk K, 2023, A Scoping Review of Experimental Evidence on Face-to-Face Components of Blended Learning in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1): 151–173.
Zhang ZV, Hyland K, 2022, Fostering Student Engagement with Feedback: An Integrated Approach. Assessing Writing, (51): 100586.
Kim S, Cho S, Kim JY, et al., 2023, Statistical Assessment on Student Engagement in Asynchronous Online Learning Using the K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Sustainability, 15(3): 2049.
Bruggeman B, Hidding K, Struyven K, et al., 2022, Negotiating Teacher Educators’ Beliefs About Blended Learning: Using Stimulated Recall to Explore Design Choices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2): 98–112.
Divaharan S, Chia A, 2022, Blended Learning Reimagined: Teaching and Learning in Challenging Contexts. Education Sciences, 12(10): 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100648
Deci EL, Ryan RM, 2000, The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4): 227–268.
Chau S, Cheung C, 2018, Academic Satisfaction with Hospitality and Tourism Education in Macao: The Influence of Active Learning, Academic Motivation, and Student Engagement. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4): 473–487.
Kleynhans C, Roberson J, Nesamvuni A, et al., 2023, The Relationship Between Gender and the Collaborative Learning Experience of University of Technology Students. Africa Education Review, 18(5–6): 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2022.2153067