Enhancing Learners’ Performance in Grade 7 Mathematics Through 50-30-20 Exercise
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Mathematical assessment exercises
Learners’ mathematical performance
50-30-20 exercises

DOI

10.26689/jcer.v8i1.6049

Submitted : 2024-01-28
Accepted : 2024-02-12
Published : 2024-02-27

Abstract

Assessment exercises constitute a crucial component of the teaching and learning process, serving the purpose of gauging the degree to which learning objectives have been accomplished. This study aims to assess the mathematics performance of Grade 7 learners using the 50-30-20 exercise. Specifically, this study seeks to determine the learners’pre-test and post-test mean scores, identify significant differences between the pre-test and post-test results, evaluate learners’ exercises, and propose enhanced exercises. The research employs a quasi-experimental design, with 40 Grade 7 learners in the school year 2023–2024 as participants, selected through purposive non-random sampling. Statistical data analysis involves the use of mean, standard deviation, paired t-test, and Cohen’s D effect size. Ethical considerations were paramount, as evidenced by a letter of authorization from the school head outlining the strict adherence to voluntary participation, informed parental consent, anonymity, confidentiality, risk mitigation, results-sharing protocols, and the commitment to keeping research data confidential. The data yielded a remarkable outcome: the experimental group exhibited improvement in both the pre-test and post-test. This result substantiates the initial objective of the study, showcasing a noteworthy and favorable performance among the participants. Consequently, it suggests that a majority of the participants strongly agree that the 50-30-20 exercises contribute to enhancing their understanding and problem-solving skills, as well as their ability to grasp mathematical concepts and improve their overall performance in mathematics. Therefore, the 50-30-20 exercises not only facilitated students in understanding mathematics lessons but were also aligned with the Department of Education’s development plan.

References

Hoyte J, 2013, Mathematics: Going Beyond the Academic Discipline, viewed December 2, 2023, https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1171&context=sferc

Naval M, Alpe J, Delos Reyes K, 2019, The Relationship of Mathscore Program and First Semester Mathematical Skills of Selected Grade 8 Student. SCHA Library.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2019, Program for International Student Assessment (PISA): Results from PISA 2018, viewed November 25, 2023. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_PHL.pdf

Trinidad, JE, 2020, Material Resources, School Climate, and Achievement Variations in the Philippines: Insights from PISA 2018. International Journal of Educational Development. 75: 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102174

Bernado ABI, Cordel MO 2nd, Lapinid MRC, et al., 2022, Contrasting Profiles of Low-Performing Mathematics Students in Public and Private Schools in the Philippines: Insights from Machine Learning. J Intell. 10(3): 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030061

Cerbito JS, 2023, Enhancing Learners’ Mathematical Performance Through Mathscore. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 19(1): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/5728-1901012229.

Menéndez IYC, Napa MAC, Moreira MLM, et al., 2019, The Importance of Formative Assessment in the Learning Teaching Process. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2): 238–249. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n2.322

Brown GTL, 2008, Conceptions of Assessment: Understanding What Assessment Means to Teachers and Students. Nova Science Publishers, New York, NY.

Black PJ, Wiliam D, 2018, Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 25(3): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

National Research Council, 1993, Measuring What Counts: A Conceptual Guide for Mathematics Assessment. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/2235

Brewster BJ, Miller T, 2023, Reflections on Mathematics Ability, Anxiety, and Interventions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2): em0729. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12822

Escalera-Chávez ME, Ramos-Hernández J, Molchanova VS, et al., 2021, Mathematics: An Academic Discipline that Generate Anxiety in College Students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(1): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.1.35

Capate RNA, Lapinid MRC, 2015, DLSU Research Congress 2015, March 2–4, 2015: Assessing the Mathematics Performance of Grade 8 Students as Basis for Enhancing Instruction and Aligning with K to 12 Curriculum. De La Salle University, Manila.

Niyazova GB, Utemov VV, Savina TN, et al., 2022, Classification of Open Mathematical Problems and Their Role in Academic Achievement and Motivation of Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8): em2143. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12265

Marshman M, Bennison A, 2022, Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), July 3–7, 2022: Identities of Mathematics Teacher Educators in a “Hybrid” Mathematics and Mathematics Education Department. MERGA, Launceston.

David AP, Reyes WS, 2020, PISA Collaborative Problem Solving Framework Vis-à-Vis the K to12 Mathematics, Social Studies, and Values Education Curricula. In Challenges of PISA: The PNU Report. Philippine Normal University and Rex Institute for Student Excellence, Inc., Manila, 262–288.

Munna AS, 2021, Assessment and Verification: A Higher Education Perspective. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(3): 425–431. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i3.20080

Beutel DA, Adie L, Lloyd MM, 2016, Assessment Moderation in an Australian Context: Processes, Practices, and Challenges. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1213232

Doz D, Felda D, Coti? M, 2022, Assessing Students’ Mathematical Knowledge with Fuzzy Logic. Educ Sci, 12(4):266. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040266

Suurtamm C, Thompson DR, Kim RY, et al., 2016, Assessment in Mathematics Education. In Assessment in Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Springer, Cham, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32394-7_1

Pagaran GM, Loremas ML, Gultiano JD, et al., 2022, Mathematics Performance of Senior High School Students in Blended Learning Amidst The Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6): 10593–10613.

Valdez V, Dominado NL, 2020, The Challenges Encountered by the Novice Secondary School Teachers in Philippines: A Basis for Mentoring. Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/njhs.v4i4.471

Reimann N, Sadler I, 2017, Personal Understanding of Assessment and the Link to Assessment Practice: The Perspectives of Higher Education Staff. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5): 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1184225

Balagtas MU, Garcia DCB, Ngo DC, 2019, Looking Through Philippine’s K to 12 Curriculum in Mathematics and Science vis-à-vis TIMSS 2015 Assessment Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12): em1788. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108494

Aguhayon HG, Tingson RD, Pentang JT, 2023, Addressing Students Learning Gaps in Mathematics through Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 4(1): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.53378/352967

Patey N, 2021, Prerequisites in Mathematics: Necessity or Unnecessary? viewed October 28, 2023. https://achievethecore.org/peersandpedagogy/prerequisites-in-mathematics/

Department of Education (DepEd), 2019, S.Y. 2017–2018 National Achievement Test (NAT) Results and Analysis. Regional Memorandum, 1–20. viewed November 18, 2023. https://region2.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2018-NATIONAL-ACHIEVEMENT-TEST-NAT-610-12-RESULTS-AND-ANALYSIS-.pdf

Thomas L, 2023, Quasi-Experimental Design | Definition, Types & Examples, viewed September 18, 2023. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quasi-experimental-design/

Nikolopoulou K, 2023, What is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples. viewed September 21, 2023. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/

Panadero E, Jonsson A, Botella J, 2017, Effects of Self-Assessment on Self-Regulated Learning and Self-Efficacy: Four Meta-Analyses. Educational Research Review, 22: 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004