The pace of globalization has been accelerated under economic development, intercultural education has transitioned from a peripheral offering to an indispensable core component of modern higher education. This paper addresses a highly specific yet increasingly common pedagogical scenario: the delivery of an intercultural communication course, taught entirely in English, to a cohort of 14 Central Asian students who are non-native English speakers. The primary objective is to explain the “dual barriers” confronting this distinct learner group—a compounding and synergistic effect where linguistic challenges and cultural obstacles intertwine and mutually reinforce each other. The study commences with a detailed profiling of the students’ unique socio-cultural and educational backgrounds, alongside a critical assessment of their English proficiency, which often veers towards instrumental rather than academic mastery. Subsequently, the paper provides a multi-faceted analysis of the specific learning impediments encountered across four interconnected dimensions: linguistic, cognitive, affective, and cultural. These impediments range from fundamental misunderstandings of specialized terminology and the socio-linguistic dynamics leading to classroom silence, to profound anxieties surrounding cultural identity and the constraining influence of deeply ingrained worldviews. Grounded in the principles of constructivism, which posits that learners actively construct knowledge, and humanism, which emphasizes the affective and personal growth aspects of learning, this paper proposes a comprehensive suite of targeted pedagogical interventions. These strategies encompass the deliberate use of multi-modal input to cater to diverse learning styles, the systematic implementation of scaffolded language support structures, the careful cultivation of a psychologically safe “third space” for dialogue, and the adoption of a multi-faceted assessment system. The ultimate aim of these proposals is to empower learners to effectively navigate and overcome the dual barriers, thereby facilitating not merely the superficial acquisition of theoretical knowledge, but the profound development of genuine intercultural understanding and practical, applicable competence.
China News, 2023, Central Asian International Students: The Belt and Road Facilitates the Interconnection and Development of the Five Central Asian Countries, China News.
Deardorff DK, 2006, Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization at Institutions of Higher Education in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3): 241–266.
Hofstede G, 2001, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.), Sage Publications.
Cummins J, 2000, Language, Power, and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire, Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Byram M, 2014, From Foreign Language Education to Education for Intercultural Citizenship, Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Ting-Toomey S, Chung LC, 2011, Understanding Intercultural Communication, Oxford University Press.
Selinger M, 2004, Cultural and Pedagogical Implications of a Global E-Learning Programme. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34: 223–239.
Makhmutov A, 2025, Education System Reform in Central Asia: Locally Oriented Solutions and Taking into Account the Socio-Cultural Context and Resources Constraints.
Biggs JB, Tang C, 2011, Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.), Open University Press.
Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Airasian PW, et al., 2001, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Longman.
Cummins J, 1979, Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children. Review of Educational Research, 49: 222–251.
Sweller J, 1988, Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2): 257–285.
Juma O, Husiyin M, Akhat A, et al., 2022, Students’ Classroom Silence and Hopelessness: The Impact of Teachers’ Immediacy on Mainstream Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12: 819821.
Festinger L, 1957, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press.
Freire P, 1970, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Herder and Herder.
Paivio A, 1990, Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach, Oxford University Press.
Krashen SD, 1982, Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition, Pergamon Press.
Rowe MB, 1987, Wait Time: Slowing Down May Be a Way of Speeding Up! Journal of Teacher Education, 11(1): 43–50.
Lyman FT, 1998, The Responsive Classroom Discussion: The Inclusion of All Students, in Anderson A (Ed.), Mainstreaming Digest, University of Maryland Press, College Park, 109–113.
Brown HD, Abeywickrama P, 2019, Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices (2nd ed.), Pearson.
Hattie J, Timperley H, 2007, The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1): 81–112.
Wood D, Bruner JS, Ross G, 1976, The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2): 89–100.