Keywords
Specialized curriculum instruction
Pedagogical reform
Problem-based learning
Submitted : 2026-02-07
Accepted : 2026-02-22
Published : 2026-03-09
Abstract
Innovative competence, as a key component of 21st-century core literacies, should be fully integrated into the entire process of disciplinary curriculum instruction in higher education. Current teaching practices in specialized courses are often constrained by several cognitive and practical misconceptions. These include viewing innovation as an “elite privilege,” over-reliance on knowledge transmission and competitive mechanisms, and neglecting the foundational role of core courses in holistic development. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a three-dimensional cultivation model encompassing “motivation–knowledge–innovation.” This model underpins a progressive instructional pathway centered on “problem-driven intrinsic motivation activation, technology-enhanced knowledge network expansion, and integrated output for practical transformation.” The framework is designed to facilitate a fundamental shift in student learning: from passive reception to active inquiry, from linear knowledge accumulation to dynamic network construction, and from memorization and replication to generative thinking. Consequently, it aims to effectively enhance students’ innovative awareness, cognitive quality, and practical capabilities. This study provides an actionable and replicable implementation framework for the systematic cultivation of innovative competence within disciplinary curricula in the era of artificial intelligence.
References
Schumpeter JA, 2020, The Theory of Economic Development, The Commercial Press, Beijing.
Drucker PF, 2025, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, China Machine Press, Beijing.
Chen J, 2017, Practical Misconceptions and Solutions in Cultivating Innovation Competence: An Analysis Based on Innovation Competence Models, Developmental Stages, and Talent Typology. Educational Development Research, 37(18): 70–77.
Gan Q, Bai X, Liu J, et al., 2020, Innovation Competence: The Third Component of the 21st Century Core Competencies 5C Model. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2(2): 57–70.
Guilford JP, 1950, Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9): 444–454.
Sternberg RJ, Lubart TL, 1991, An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development. Human Development, 34(1): 1–31.
Sun F, Hu Z, 2025, The Generative Logic of Teaching and Learning Driven by Intelligent Technology. Higher Education Research, 46(2): 74–81.
Pang W, 2022, Cultivating Creativity from the Perspective of Creative Psychology: Goals, Principles, and Strategies. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), (11): 25–40.
Jaspers K, 2016, The Origin and Goal of History, East China Normal University Press, Shanghai.
Liu Q, 2022, Learning Motivation and Human Self-Existence. Higher Education Research, 43(10): 22–30.
Liu T, Ran L, 2025, Rethinking the Fundamental Significance of Humanities Education. Higher Education Research, 46(2): 1–10.
Peng J, 2023, Factors Influencing College Students’ Intrinsic Learning Motivation and Their Mechanisms: An Analysis Based on Grounded Theory. Modern University Education, (2): 93–102.
Li X, Zhao X, 2024, The “Genius Hour” Project in American K–12 Education and the Cultivation of Students’ Innovation Competence. Journal of Comparative Education, 352(4): 77–89.
Liu S, et al., 2016, Curriculum, Teaching, and Assessment for 21st Century Core Competencies Education. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 34(3): 38–45.
Lai ER, Yarbro J, Di Cerbo K, et al., 2018, Skills for Today: What We Know about Teaching and Assessing Creativity, Pearson, London.
Guo Q, Qiao C, Li J, et al., 2026, How Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowers Teaching from a Disciplinary Perspective: A Case Study of Science Project-Based Learning. China Educational Technology, 468: 75–83.
Zhang Q, 2016, Knowledge Application and Innovation Competence Cultivation: The Reform of University Professional Courses Based on Innovation Education Philosophy. Higher Education Research, 37(3): 62–67.
Guo F, Shi J, Chen Y, 2025, Reconstructing Student Learning Assessment Systems in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: The Exploration of McGill University and Its Implications. Higher Education Research, 46(2): 101–109.
McGill University, 2022, 12th Report of the Academic Policy Committee to Senate on the APC Meetings Held on April 14th and May 2nd, 2022.