Exploring the Application of ChatGPT in Graduate Neuroscience Education

  • Cixia Li College of Life Science and Technology, Henan Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China; Henan Key Laboratory of Medical Tissue Regeneration, Henan Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China
  • Xiaoping Wang Henan Key Laboratory of Medical Tissue Regeneration, Henan Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China
  • Xiao Li Henan Key Laboratory of Medical Tissue Regeneration, Henan Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China
  • Xianwei Wang Henan Key Laboratory of Medical Tissue Regeneration, Henan Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China
  • Qiong Li North Henan Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China
  • Ciqing Yang College of Life Science and Technology, Henan Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China
Keywords: Generative artificial intelligence, Usage patterns, Self-regulated learning, Academic integrity, Survey report

Abstract

With artificial intelligence’s rapid progress, language models like ChatGPT are entering higher education, offering opportunities and risks. We surveyed faculty and graduate students at Henan Medical University to examine ChatGPT’s role in graduate neuroscience teaching. Quantitative analyses profiled awareness, usage patterns, perceived roles, effectiveness, and concerns. Overall usage remained below 50%. Faculty and students most often used ChatGPT for reference consultation, research support, and academic writing; user experience was generally positive. Respondents reported benefits for information and resource integration (78.42%), comprehension of complex concepts (74.10%), learning interest and engagement (62.59%), personalized learning (50.36%), and timely feedback with abundant resources (65.47%). Nevertheless, participants highlighted challenges including information accuracy, academic integrity, and technological dependence, which could impede independent learning and critical thinking. Many favored broader, well-guided adoption paired with training. We conclude that ChatGPT can meaningfully support graduate neuroscience education when integrated with human instruction, rigorous verification, and clear ethical safeguards. Future work should evaluate learning outcomes longitudinally, develop evidence-based implementation frameworks, and address equity and privacy to realize sustainable impact in specialized domains.

References

Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S, 2023, ChatGPT in Medicine: An Overview of Its Applications, Advantages, Limitations, Future Prospects, and Ethical Considerations. Front Artif Intell, 6: 1169595.

Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Ismagilova E, et al., 2019, Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Emerging Challenges, Opportunities, and Agenda for Research, Practice and Policy. Elsevier, 57(7): 101994.

Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, et al., 2023, ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103: 102274.

Van Dis EaM, Bollen J, Zuidema W, et al., 2023, ChatGPT: Five Priorities for Research. Nature, 614(7947): 224–226.

Coffey L, 2023, Students Outrunning Faculty in AI Use, viewed September 29, 2025, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2023/10/31/most-students-outrunning-faculty-ai-use

Toppo G, 2023, National ChatGPT Survey: Teachers Accepting AI Into Classrooms & Workflow — Even More Than Students, viewed September 29, 2025, https://www.the74million.org/article/national-chatgpt-survey-teachers-accepting-ai-into-classrooms-workflow-even-more-than-students/

Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, et al., 2019, Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education – Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1): 39.

Hartley K, Hayak M, Ko UH, 2024, Artificial Intelligence Supporting Independent Student Learning: An Evaluative Case Study of ChatGPT and Learning to Code. Education Sciences, 14(2): 120.

Broadbent J, Panadero E, Lodge JM, et al., 2020, Technologies to Enhance Self-Regulated Learning in Online and Computer-Mediated Learning Environments, Bishop MJ, Boling E, Elen J, et al., Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology: Learning Design, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 37–52.

Chang DH, Lin MP, Hajian S, et al., 2023, Educational Design Principles of Using AI Chatbot That Supports Self-Regulated Learning in Education: Goal Setting, Feedback, and Personalization. Sustainability, 15(17): 12921.

Maheshwari G, 2024, Factors Influencing Students’ Intention to Adopt and Use ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Study in the Vietnamese Context. Education and Information Technologies, 29(10): 12167–12195.

Jo H, 2024, From Concerns to Benefits: A Comprehensive Study of ChatGPT Usage in Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1): 35.

Fütterer T, Fischer C, Alekseeva A, et al., 2023, ChatGPT in Education: Global Reactions to AI Innovations. Scientific Reports, 13(1): 15310.

David B-A, Leticia OA, 2023, Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7(1): 52–62.

Zhang B, 2023, Preparing Educators and Students for ChatGPT and AI Technology in Higher Education: Benefits, Limitations, Strategies, and Implications of ChatGPT & AI Technologies, Comparative & International Education Series.

Kohnke L, Moorhouse BL, Zou D, 2023, ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2): 537–550.

Published
2025-11-10