A Study on the Postgraduate Quality Evaluation Model and Its Recognition Analysis
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Postgraduate
Quality evaluation model
Importance
Recognition analysis

DOI

10.26689/jcer.v9i7.11341

Submitted : 2025-07-01
Accepted : 2025-07-16
Published : 2025-07-31

Abstract

With the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence technologies, represented by large language models, university-level computer science education is undergoing a critical transition—from knowledge-based instruction to competency-oriented teaching. A postgraduate student competency evaluation model can serve as a framework to organize and guide both teaching and research activities at the postgraduate level. A number of relevant research efforts have already been conducted in this area. Graduate education plays a vital role not only as a continuation and enhancement of undergraduate education but also as essential preparation for future research endeavors. An analysis of the acceptance of competency evaluation models refers to the assessment of how various stakeholders perceive the importance of different components within the model. Investigating the degree of acceptance among diverse groups—such as current undergraduate students, current postgraduate students, graduates with less than three years of work experience, and those with more than three years of work experience—can offer valuable insights for improving and optimizing postgraduate education and training practices.

References

Liu R, Zenke C, Liu C, et al., 2024, Teaching CS50 with AI: Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence in Computer Science Education, Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2024), Portland, USA, 750–756.

Becker BA, MacNeil S, Leinonen J, et al., 2024, Discussing the Changing Landscape of Generative AI in Computing Education, Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2024), Portland, USA, 1916–1922.

Pelaez-Sanchez IC, Velarde-Camaqui D, Glasserman-Morales LD, 2024, The Impact of Large Language Models on Higher Education. Frontiers in Education, 9: 1392091.

Khlaif ZN, Ayyoub A, Hamamra B, et al., 2024, University Teachers’ Views on the Adoption and Integration of Generative AI Tools for Student Assessment in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 14(10): 1090.

Gimpel H, Gutheil N, Mayer V, et al., 2024, (Generative) AI Competencies for Future-Proof Graduates: Inspiration for Higher-Education Institutions, Fraunhofer FIT, Hohenheim.

Vlachopoulos D, Makri A, 2024, A Systematic Literature Review on Authentic Assessment in Higher Education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83: 101425.

University of Michigan–Flint, 2024, Assessments in the AI Era, viewed June 20, 2025, https://www.umflint.edu/genai/assignments-in-the-ai-era/

University of Sydney, 2024. University of Sydney’s AI Assessment Policy: Protecting Integrity and Empowering Students, viewed June 20, 2025, https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2024/11/27/university-of-sydney-ai-assessment-policy.html

Alt D, Naamati-Schneider L, Weishut DJN, 2023, Competency-Based Learning and Formative Assessment Feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 48(4): 1–17.

Wang J, 2019, A Multidimensional Learning Evaluation Based on Personality Theory. Talent, 2019(12): 17.

Zhang L, Chen E, 2021, Constructing a Student Evaluation System in the New Era. Modern Educational Management, 2021(07): 89–96.

Gamage KAA, Jeyachandran K, Dehideniya SCP, 2023, Online and Hybrid Teaching Effects on Graduate Attributes. Education Sciences, 13(2): 221.

Zhou J, Wu X, Kuang Y, 2021, Academic Value-Added Evaluation for University Students. Modern Educational Management, 2021(12): 9–18.

Xie Z, Li X, 2017, The Research Capability of Master’s Students and Its Impact on Employment. Fudan Education Forum, 15(01): 62–69.

Lin Y, Zhang R, Dong Y, 2018, Academic Norms Cultivation for Postgraduates Abroad. Education Teaching Forum, 2018(09): 218–220.

Shen S, 2017, Comprehensive Quality Evaluation System for Postgraduates. Technology Economics and Management Research, 2017(10): 35–39.

Zhang C, Xie W, 2018, Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Postgraduates Based on the Competency Model. Continuing Education, 32(08): 70–73.

Chen Z, Guo J, 2018, Postgraduate Competency Structure Model. Academic Degrees and Graduate Education, 2018(07): 55–60.

Jiang M, Kong J, Wang X, 2017, Training Postgraduates in Computer Science Based on the Competency Model. Value Engineering, 36(07): 184–186.

Zhou E, Liu Q, Wang G, 2017, Analysis of Professional Postgraduate Quality. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 2017(04): 93–95.

Guan S, 2017, Innovation Ability Cultivation Model of Postgraduates. Modern Manufacturing Technology and Equipment, 2017(10): 177–178.

Chen Y, Zhai Y, 2016, Postgraduate Education Development at World-Class Universities. Foreign Education Research, 43(07): 104–114.

Wang Y, Liu W, 2012, High-Level Talent Training in Universities Based on Competency. Value Engineering, 31(28): 250–251.

Zhang Q, He Y, 2007, Diversified Model for Postgraduate Evaluation. China Adult Education, 2007(21): 59–60.

Guo Z, 2004, Comprehensive Quality Evaluation System for Postgraduates. Higher Education Research in Science and Engineering, 2004(02): 79–81.

Annapureddy R, Fornaroli A, Gatica-Perez D, 2025, Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 1(1): 1–21.

Zdravkova K, Ilijoski B, 2025, Impact of Large Language Models on Computer Science Student Writing. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., 22: 32.

Burneo-Arteaga P, Lira Y, Murzi H, 2025, Competency-Based Training Framework for Generative AI in Higher Education. Frontiers in Education, 10: 1594199.