Keywords
Art design
Design thinking
Interdisciplinary learning
Submitted : 2024-02-28
Accepted : 2024-03-14
Published : 2024-03-29
Abstract
In the context of the digital age, this paper discusses the thoughts of STEAM education concept (science, technology, engineering, art, mathematics) on the reform of the teaching system in the field of art and design education. The reflection of STEAM education concept on art and design education can be carried out in two aspects. The first aspect is the core value of the discipline of art and design in STEAM education in terms of interdisciplinary integration, especially the importance of design thinking in interdisciplinary education. On the other hand, the STEAM education concept reflects the system construction of art and design education in cultivating interdisciplinary talents. Faced with the challenge of digitalization, art and design education urgently needs to update its teaching strategy and content. Through the combination of art and science, art and technology, art and project, and art and mathematics, a comprehensive interdisciplinary learning platform has been built, aiming to cultivate future talents with innovative consciousness and improve comprehensive quality.
References
Pilevari N, Yavari F, 2020, Industry Revolutions Development from Industry 1.0 to Industry 5.0 in Manufacturing, Journal of Industrial Strategic Management, 5(2): 44–63.
Melnyk L, Kubatko O, Dehtyarova I, et al., 2019, The Effect of Industrial Revolutions on the Transformation of Social and Economic Systems. Problems and Perspectives in Management,17(4): 381–391.
Müller J, 2020, Enabling Technologies for Industry 5.0, European Commission, Luxembourg, 8–10.
Huang S, Wang B, Li X, et al., 2022, Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, Complementation and Co-Evolution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2022(64): 424–428.
Sydle S, 2022, Education 5.0: What Does It Mean? How Does It Work? Blog SYDLE, viewed September 12, 2024, https://www.sydle.com/blog/education-5-0-61e71a99edf3b9259714e25a/
Kristina D, 2021, Education 5.0: Rehumanising Education in the Age of Machines, viewed February 12, 2024, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/education-50-rehumanising-age-machines-kristina-dervojeda
Nikum K, 2022, Answers to the Societal Demands with Education 5.0: Indian Higher Education System. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(S1): 115–127.
Saxena A, Pant D, Saxena A, et al., 2020, The Emergence of Educators for Industry 5.0 An Indological Perspective. The International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(12): 359–363.
Bequette JW, Bequette MB, 2012, A Place for Art and Design Education in the STEM Conversation. Art Education, 65(2): 40–47.
Allina B, 2018, The Development of STEAM Educational Policy to Promote Student Creativity and Social Empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2): 77–87.
Daugherty MK, 2013, The Prospect of an “A” in STEM Education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2): 10–14.
Quigley CF, Herro D, Jamil FM, 2017, Developing a Conceptual Model of STEAM Teaching Practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2): 1–12.
Liao C, 2016, An Arts-Integrated Approach to STEAM Education. Art Education, 69(6): 44–49.
Taylor PC, 2016, Why is a STEAM Curriculum Perspective Crucial to the 21st Century? viewed February 12, 2024, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307396291_Why_is_a_STEAM_Curriculum_Perspective_Crucial_to_the_21st_Century#fullTextFileContent
Torrance EP, 1972, Can We Teach Children To Think Creatively? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(2): 114–143.
Winner E, Goldstein TR, Vincent-Lancrin S, 2013, Art for Art’s Sake?: The Impact of Arts Education, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264180789-en
Bucheli RJ, Goldberg MR, Phillips A, 1991, SYMPOSIUM-ARTS AS EDUCATION. Harvard Educational Review, 61(1): 25–26.
Perignat E, Katz-Buonincontro J, 2019, STEAM in Practice and Research: An Integrative Literature Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2019(31): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Li G, Lv L, 2018, From STEM Education to STEAM Education: An Analysis of the Role of Arts. China Audio-Visual Education, 2018(9): 31–39 + 47.
Rabkin N, Hedberg E, 2011, Arts Education in America: What the Declines Mean for Arts Participation. Based on the 2008 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts. Research Report #52, National Endowment for the Arts, viewed February 10, 2024, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234638538_Arts_Education_in_America_What_the_Declines_Mean_for_Arts_Participation_Based_on_the_2008_Survey_of_Public_Participation_in_the_Arts_Research_Report_52
Radziwill N, Benton M, Moellers C, 2015, From STEM to STEAM: Reframing What it Means to Learn. STEAM, 2(1): 1–7.
Swaminathan S, Schellenberg EG, 2015, Arts Education, Academic Achievement and Cognitive Ability, in Tinio PP, Smith JK, (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts, Cambridge University Press, New York, 364–384.
Brown T, 2008, Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6): 84.
Vignoli M, Dosi C, Balboni B, 2023, Design Thinking Mindset: Scale Development and Validation. Studies in Higher Education, 48(6): 926–940.
Herro D, Quigley C, Andrews J, et al., 2017, Co-Measure: Developing an Assessment for Student Collaboration in STEAM Activities. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1): 26.
Jolly A, 2014, STEM vs. STEAM: Do the Arts Belong? Education Week, viewed February 10, 2024, https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-stem-vs-steam-do-the-arts-belong/2014/11
Henriksen D, 2017, Creating STEAM with Design Thinking: Beyond STEM and Arts Integration. STEAM, 3(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20170301.11
Keane L , Keane M, 2016, Steam by Design. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 21(1): 61–82.
Guaman-Quintanilla S, Everaert P, Chiluiza K, et al., 2023, Impact of Design Thinking in Higher Education: A Multi-Actor Perspective on Problem Solving and Creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1): 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z
Ananda LR, Rahmawati Y, Khairi F, 2023, Critical Thinking Skills of Chemistry Students by Integrating Design Thinking with STEAM-PjBL. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1): 352.
Possaghi I, 2023, Designing Emerging Technology-Supported Learning Activities Based on the DT Approach for K–12 Users, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, 769–772.
Kijima R, Sun KL, 2021, ‘Females Don’t Need to be Reluctant’: Employing Design Thinking to Harness Creative Confidence and Interest in STEAM. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40(1): 66–81.
Baruch JM, 2017, Doctors as Makers. Academic Medicine, 92(1): 40–44.
OECD, 2018, The Future of Education and Skills Education 2030, viewed February 10, 2024, https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
Balakrishnan B, 2022, Exploring the Impact of Design Thinking Tool Among Design Undergraduates: A Study on Creative Skills and Motivation to Think Creatively. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3): 1799–1812.
Mardiah A, Irwanto I, Afrizal A, 2023, Taking Design Thinking to Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review Over a Past Decade. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(3): 18–27.
Hook J, Hjermitslev T, Iversen OS, et al., 2013, The ReflecTable: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice in Design Education, in Otze PK, Marsden G, Indgaard GL, Esson J, Inckler M, (eds.), the Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2013, Volume 8118, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 624–641.
Xie HT, 2010, A Preliminary Study on the Reform of Training Mode for Art and Design Talents. Education and Modernization, 2010(1): 42–45.
Li YZ, 2001, Megatrends: Integration of Art and Science. Studies in Literature and Art, 2001(1): 98–112.
Wu XY, 2015, From Natural Science to Design Art—Parametric Design and Construction Based on Tyson Polygon, Digital Factory DADA2015 Series Activities Digital Architecture International Academic Conference Proceedings, Nanjing University of the Arts, 49–60.
Zhou ZR, 2023, Taking Mid Journey as an Example to Explore the Significance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Design Application in the Process of Design Thinking. Transportation, 2023(15): 109–111.
Li J, Ye N, 2023, When Creativity Meets Art, Science and Engineering on the Straight Line of Design...—Chatting with Young Designer Nanfang About Design. Design, 2023(2): 34–39.
He K, 2004, Research on the Cultivation Mode of Innovative Talents in Art and Design Education. Decoration, 2004(03): 88.
Lu W, Huang Y, 2011, A Preliminary Study on “Project-Style” Teaching Reform Mode of Environmental Art Design Major—A Case Study of Interior Design. Decoration, 2011(2): 139–140.
Wang WJ, 2010, The History, Theory and Application of “Art Design Geometry.” Journal of Nanjing University of the Arts (Fine Arts and Design), 2010(5): 113–117.