Numeracy education stands as a pivotal component of the educational landscape, necessitating attention from both administrators and teachers. To facilitate the ongoing improvement of teachers’ numeracy instructional skills, it becomes imperative to confront the barriers hindering students’ attainment of educational objectives. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the numeracy instruction provided by mathematics teachers, with an emphasis on its impact on curriculum and pedagogy enhancement. Additionally, it identified issues in the management of numeracy instruction, forming the foundation for forthcoming numeracy management initiatives targeting elementary school teachers. This study employed a researcher-developed questionnaire to conduct a descriptive survey involving 30 elementary mathematics teachers from Marawoy Elementary School. Utilizing statistical tools, specifically the mean, responses were meticulously analyzed, while issues concerning numeracy management instruction were methodically extracted and interpreted thematically. The study affirmed the robust alignment between teachers’ knowledge content and pedagogical approaches with the diverse learning needs of their students. Notably, instructional materials, classroom management, and assessment techniques exhibited variation according to students’ learning capabilities. Unfortunately, suboptimal Internet connectivity and limited access to learning resources only marginally supported the integration of technology in the teaching and learning processes. Consequently, the implementation of a numeracy management program was recommended to bridge instructional gaps among teachers in the domain of numeracy.
Alcantara AA, 2022, Management of Numeracy Instruction in Public Elementary Schools in the Division of Batangas Province. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 5(1): 215–217.
Ofsted, 2017, Bold Beginnings: The Reception Curriculum in a Sample of Good and Outstanding Primary Schools. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a82d03040f0b6230269cd73/28933_Ofsted_-_Early_Years_Curriculum_Report_-_Accessible.pdf
Barrett Rose & Lee Inc., 2020, The Essential Skill of Numeracy, viewed 17 March 2023, https://www.barrettrose.com/The-Essential-Skill-of-Numeracy/
Ogunu M, 2001, Introduction to Educational Management, Mabogun Publishers, Benin City.
Akpan C, 2012, Resource Management and Job Involvement Among University Lecturers in South-South Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(8): 12–22.
Babalola JB, 2006, Overview of Management, in Educational Management Though and Practice. Codat Publications, Ibadan, 1–16.
Idoko AA, 2015, Educational Management and Other Contemporary Problems. Wintoren Books, Makurdi.
Footprints, 2022, How to Create a Positive Learning Environment, V6P 5Z2, viewed 17 March 2023, https://www.footprintsrecruiting.com/teacher-community/blog/how-create-positive-learning-environment
Awla H, 2014, Learning Styles and Their Relation to Teaching Styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3): 241–245. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23
Hattie J, Timperley H, 2007, The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Guinocor M, Almerino P, Mamites I, et al., 2020, Mathematics Performance of Students in a Philippine State University. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3): em0586. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7859
Education Scotland, 2019, Numeracy Across Learning: Principles and Practice, viewed 17 March 2023, https://education.gov.scot/Documents/numeracy-across-learning-pp.pdf
Internet Society, 2017, Internet Access and Education: Key Considerations for Policy Makers, viewed 17 March 2023, https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2017/internet-access-and-education/
Duncan BJ, 1998, On Teacher Knowledge: A Return to Shulman, viewed 17 March 2023, https://educationjournal.web.illinois.edu/archive/index.php/pes/article/view/2135.pdf
Hill HC, Rowan B, Ball DL, 2005, Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2): 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
Abdukarimova NA, Zubaydova NN, 2021, Deductive and Inductive Approaches to Teaching Grammar, JourmalNX, 2021: 372–376.
Danielson C, 2007, Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching (2nd Edition), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria.
Laal M, Ghodsi SM, 2012, Benefits of Collaborative Learning, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31: 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
Kolb AY, Kolb DA, 2017, Experiential Learning Theory as a Guide for Experiential Educators in Higher Education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1): 7–44.
Sieberer-Nagler K, 2015, Effective Classroom-Management & Positive Teaching. English Language Teaching, 9(1): 163–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n1p163
Gurat MG, 2018, Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategies Among Student Teachers. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(3): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110302
Cardino Jr. JM, Ortega-Dela Cruz RA, 2020, Understanding of Learning Styles and Teaching Strategies Towards Improving the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 8(1): 19–43. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.8.1.1348
Ciobanu NR, 2018, Active and Participatory Teaching Methods. European Journal of Education, 1(2): 69–72. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejed.v1i2
Capuno R, Revalde H, Etcuban JO, et al., 2019, Facilitating Learning Mathematics Through the Use of Instructional Media. International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education, 14(3): 677–688. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5785
Johnson AM, Jacovina ME, Russell DE, et al., 2016, Challenges and Solutions When Using Technologies in the Classroom, in Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction, Taylor & Francis, New York, 13–29.
Mosca J, Paul D, Skiba M, 2011, Technology Increases Students Attention. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v3i8.1687
Rajkumar R, Hema G, 2018, Using Google Apps and Tools for Teaching Learning Mathematics Classroom, in Quality Higher Education: Digital Era. Salem: Creative Zone, Salem, 41–48.
Chingos MM, West MR, 2010, Do More Effective Teachers Earn More Outside of the Classroom? Working Paper Series. PEPG 10-02, Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University, Cambridge.
Butts RF, 2010, A History of Education in American Culture, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Witzel BS, Allsopp D, 2007, Dynamic Concrete Instruction in an Inclusive Classroom. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(4): 244–248.
Uribe-Flórez LJ, Wilkins JLM, 2010, Elementary School Teachers’ Manipulative Use. School Science and Mathematics, 110(7): 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00046.x
Najumba J, 2013, The Effectiveness of Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools. Sage Publication, Boston.
Alquraan MF, 2012, Methods of Assessing Students’ Learning in Higher Education. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 5(2): 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981211251160
Wadood F, Akbar F, Ullah I, 2021, The Importance and Essential Steps of Pilot Testing in Management Studies: A Quantitative Survey Results. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(5).
The Center on Standards & Assessment Implementation, 2018, Valid and Reliable Assessments, viewed 30 March 2023, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED588476.pdf
Mulwa EC, 2015, Difficulties Encountered by Students in the Learning and Usage of Mathematical Terminology: A Critical Literature Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(3): 27–37.
Suson R, Caratbate C, Anoos W, et al., 2020, Differentiated Instruction for Basic Reading Comprehension in Philippine Settings. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9): 3814–3824. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080904
Creswell JW, 2013, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Ed.), SAGE Publications, London.