The Effect of Performance Expectancy on Digital Technology Learning Performance of Students in Colleges of Construction
Download PDF

Keywords

Performance expectancy
Digital technology
Learning performance
Learning intention

DOI

10.26689/erd.v8i3.14624

Submitted : 2026-03-23
Accepted : 2026-04-07
Published : 2026-04-22

Abstract

To address the imbalance between the supply and demand of “civil engineering + digital” interdisciplinary talents under the background of the digital transformation of the construction industry, and to reveal the internal connection between performance expectancy and digital technology learning performance of students in construction colleges, this study systematically explores the dimensional composition of performance expectancy and its influence path on digital technology learning performance based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Digital Natives Theory, through methods such as literature research, in-depth interviews, questionnaire surveys, and structural equation modeling. The study identifies three core dimensions of performance expectancy: Perceived Usefulness for Career, Academic Perceived Enhancement, and Relative Advantage, and verifies the mediating effect of behavioral intention between performance expectancy and digital technology learning performance. The constructed theoretical model of “performance expectancy - learning intention - learning performance” explains the driving mechanism of digital technology learning performance of students in construction colleges, providing theoretical support and practical tools for the government to formulate talent incentive policies and for construction colleges to optimize talent training programs.

References

Xiao F, Guo HJ, 2024, Digital Labor And Youth Development. China Youth Study, 35(04): 35–42.

Jiang FJ, 2021, Research On The Influencing Factors Of College Students’ Learning Behavioral Intention In Blended Teaching Environments. E-education Research, 42(06): 105–112 + 128.

Wang CS, 2025, An Extended UTAUT Model Study On College Students’ Willingness To Learn AI Painting Tools. Packaging Engineering, 46(08): 209–217.

Zhao J, Ni MY, Zhang Q, et al., 2024, AIGC Reconstructs Graduate Academic Practice: A Study On The Influencing Factors Of Continuous Use Intention. Journal of Modern Information, 44(07): 34–46.

Gao F, Lü J, 2025, Research On The Influencing Factors Of Students’ Online Learning Satisfaction In Blended Teaching. Jiangsu Higher Education, (02): 78–85.

Brock TC, Edelman SK, Edwards DC, et al., 1965, Seven Studies Of Performance Expectancy As A Determinant Of Actual Performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1(4): 295–310.

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al., 2003, User Acceptance Of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 425–478.

Peng P, Ao Y, Li M, et al., 2022, Building Information Modeling Learning Performance Of AEC Undergraduate Students In China. Behavioral Sciences, 12(8): 269.

Tung FC, Chang SC, 2008, Nursing Students’ Behavioural Intention To Use Online Learning: A Questionnaire Survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9): 1299–1309.

Caldwell A, 2012, A Proposed Questionnaire to Measure Student Motivation and Intention Toward Learning Science. NCE-MSTL, Resource & Research Guides, 3(6): 12.

Rajeh MT, Abduljabbar FH, Alqahtani SM, et al., 2021, Students’ Satisfaction And Continued Intention Toward E-Learning: A Theory-Based Study. Medical Education Online, 26(1): 1961348.

Fu S, Gu H, Yang B, 2020, The Affordances Of AI-Enabled Automatic Scoring Applications On Learners’ Continuous Learning Intention: An Empirical Study In China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5): 1674–1692.

Qureshi MA, Khaskheli A, Qureshi JA, et al., 2023, Factors Affecting Students’ Learning Performance Through Collaborative Learning And Engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4): 2371–2391.

Prensky M, 2001, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5): 1–6.

Yang YN, Zhang ZC, Ma YD, et al., 2022, Analysis Of The Digital Transformation Path Of The Construction Industry From The Perspective Of Technology Logic. Science and Technology Management Research, 42(24): 137–142.