An elementary question seems to appear quite incessantly on experience, both as a design student and practicing pedagogue of design: What is design? This often resurfaced during conversation with fellow students, drawing some uncertainty on how to approach and define design. These uncertainties can limit the scope through which students might fully engage with the design process, and hence, their creative scope in design teaching and learning might be limited. Despite vast amounts of research showing professional design views, very little thought has been given to how students perceive the term ‘design’ within the umbrella of school education. Unless a window to such insight is opened, design teaching methods cannot be improved. This research explores the way design students conceptualize the word “design” through an open-ended inquiry that understands their views, challenges, and influences. Qualitative methods such as interviews and thematic analysis are used to grasp common themes and divergent views and shape the understanding of design by the students. Findings will prove useful in understanding how design is taught within academic institutions, and they contribute toward excellence in design pedagogy and curriculum development. The paper demonstrated the need to fill gaps amongst the students to be done by a more structured form of teaching design students. Findings can form interesting follow-up research on curriculum development improvements and the subsequent long-term effects on design learning.
Cross N, 1990, The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability. Design Studies, 11(3): 127–140.
Heskett J, 2011, Design: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Galle P, 2011, Foundational and Instrumental Design Theory. The MIT Press, 27(4): 81–94.
Papanek V, 1985, Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, Academy Chicago, Chicago.
Hilpinen R, 2008, On Artifacts and Works of Art. Theoria, 58: 58–82.
Norman D, 2013, The Design of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.
Rowe P, 1991, Design Thinking, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Moggridge B, 2007, Designing Interactions, MIT Press, Cambridge.
ReadyMag, 2019, Rams Dieter: 10 Principles for Good Design, visited August 20, 2019, https://readymag.com/shuffle/dieter-rams/
Pankina M, 2020, Axiology and Praxeology of Design Thinking. KnE Social Sciences, 4(11): 284–293.
Papanek V, 1977, Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, Paladin, St. Albans.
Ulusan U, Turan A, 2016, Investigating Conceptual Foundations of Design Ability: An Analysis Through the Expressions of the Experiencing Mind. Systems & Design: Beyond Processes and Thinking, Valencia.
Baha E, Koch M, Sturkenboom N, et al., 2020, Why Am I Studying Design? DRS Biennial Conference Series, Design Research Society, United Kingdom.
Corazzo J, 2016, Graphic Design Students’ Conceptions of the Discipline in an Era of Expanded Design. Graphic Design Educators' Network Pedagogic Research Symposium, Loughborough University.
Gray CM, 2013, Factors That Shape Design Thinking. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(3): 8–20.
Brunner L, 2007, Technology and Design Thinking: A Look at Interior Design Students’ Conceptualizations. Computer Science Education.
Braun V, Clarke V, 2006, Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.
Attride-Stirling J, 2001, Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 1(3): 385–405.
Thomas J, Harden A, 2008, Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8: 45.
Robson C, 2011, Real World Research (3rd ed.), Wiley, Chichester.
Wasserman L, 2013, All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference, Springer, New York.
Beyer A, 2021, Introduction to Statistics for Psychology, thesis, Chandler-Gilbert Community College.