Artificial Intelligence and the Institutional Efficiency of Environmental Policy: A Transaction Cost Perspective
Download PDF

Keywords

Green AI
Environmental governance
Transaction costs
MRV
Policy feedback loop
ETS
Carbon pricing
Regulatory compliance
Algorithmic governance

DOI

10.26689/pbes.v9i4.14948

Submitted : 2026-05-04
Accepted : 2026-05-19
Published : 2026-06-03

Abstract

Environmental policy effectiveness is often constrained not by instrument design itself, but by implementation frictions, information asymmetry, high monitoring and enforcement costs, and slow policy adjustment under rapidly changing climate and market conditions. This conceptual article develops a transaction cost perspective on how artificial intelligence (AI) can function as a governance infrastructure that strengthens environmental regulation. It highlights three channels: (1) intelligent monitoring that upgrades Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) from periodic reporting to continuous data-driven oversight; (2) predictive modeling that supports adaptive recalibration of policy parameters through a policy feedback loop; and (3) improved integrity of carbon pricing and emissions trading systems (ETS) via anomaly detection and cross-validation of emissions claims. The analysis outlines expected economic effects, such as lower administrative and compliance costs, more reliable price signals, and stronger incentives for green investment, while emphasizing that benefits depend on institutional safeguards. A governance risk framework is proposed to address algorithmic bias, digital inequality, AI energy use, and technological dependency through measurable KPIs. Overall, AI complements rather than replaces environmental policy by expanding institutional capacity for effective regulation.

References

IMF, 2019, Fiscal Policies for Paris Climate Strategies: From Principle to Practice (No. 19/010), International Monetary Fund.

Hopke J, 2020, Connecting Extreme Heat Events to Climate Change: Media Coverage of Heat Waves and Wildfires. Environmental Communication, 14(4): 492–508.

IEA, 2018, World Energy Outlook 2018, International Energy Agency.

Reber U, 2021, Global Climate Change or National Climate Changes? An Analysis of the Performance of Online Issue Publics in Integrating Global Issues. Environmental Communication, 15(2): 173–188.

Fischer C, Pizer W, 2019, Horizontal Equity Effects in Energy Regulation. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2019(6): 209–S237.

Abdessadak A, Ghennioui H, Thirion-Moreau N, et al., 2025, Digital Twin Technology and Artificial Intelligence in Energy Transition: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Applications. Energy Reports, 2025(13): 5196–5218.

Edenhofer O, Knopf B, Bak C, et al., 2017, Aligning Climate Policy with Finance Ministers’ G20 agenda. Nature Climate Change, 2017(7): 463–465.

Levi S, Flachsland C, Jakob M, 2020, Political Economy Determinants of Carbon Pricing. Global Environmental Politics, 2020(20): 128–156.

Fernández Salguero R, 2025, Effectiveness of Carbon Pricing and Compensation Instruments: An Umbrella Review of the Empirical Evidence, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.06887

Mercer L, Burke J, 2023, Strengthening MRV Standards for Greenhouse Gas Removals to Improve Climate Change Governance, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

Islam M, Islam M, Badhan I, et al., 2025, The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Carbon Pricing Policies: Economic and Environmental Implications. Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review, 3(1).

Chen Z, Brockway P, Few S, et al., 2025, The Impact of Emissions Trading Systems on Technological Innovation for Climate Change Mitigation: A Systematic Review. Climate Policy, 25(8): 1293–1309.

Bai D, et al., 2024, Impact Mechanisms and Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Digital Economy and Green Innovation: A Perspective based on Regional Collaboration within Urban Agglomerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024(207): 123613.

Wu H, et al., 2025, Digital Economy, Government Innovation Preferences, and Regional Innovation Capacity: Analysis using PVAR Model. Systems, 13(5): 382.

Shi Y, Yang B, 2024, The Coupling and Coordinated Development of Digital Finance and Green Finance under the Vision of Dual Carbon and the Examination of Carbon Emission Reduction Effect. Sustainable Futures, 2024(7): 100217.

Wei T, Zhu Q, Liu W, 2024, The Effect of Market-based Environmental Regulations on Green Technology Innovation: The Regulatory Effect based on Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 16(11): 4719.

Batjes N, Ceschia E, Heuvelink G, et al., 2024, Towards a Modular, Multi-Ecosystem Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) Framework for Soil Organic Carbon Stock Change Assessment. Carbon Management, 2024(15): 2410812.

Mercer L, Burke J, Rodway-Dyer S, 2024, Towards Improved Cost Estimates for Monitoring, Reporting and Verification of Carbon Dioxide Removal, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

Wang H, Li W, Zha H, et al., 2024, Carbon Market Simulation with Adaptive Mechanism Design, In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-24), 8824–8828).

Ortiz D, Migueis V, Leal V, et al., 2022, Analysis of Renewable Energy Policies through Decision Trees. Sustainability, 14(13): 7720.

Khan T, et al., 2025, Conceptualization of Artificial Intelligence Use for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Forecasting and Mitigation. Sustainability, 17(22): 10153.

Coase R, 1960, The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960(3): 1–44.

Williamson O, 2005, Transaction Cost Economics, In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, 41–65.