Keywords
Motivation for language learning
Task-based language teaching and learning
E-learning
Computer-assisted language learning
Submitted : 2022-09-26
Accepted : 2022-10-11
Published : 2022-10-26
Abstract
This paper discusses the strengths and drawbacks of blended language learning. There exists a great debate about what constitutes blended learning. By considering its advantages and disadvantages, we contend that there is a need for higher education to embrace blended learning in order to increase educational opportunities and improve learning outcomes. In order to support this argument, this paper addresses the transformative potential of blended learning based on recommendations for class redesign from previous studies. This paper then concludes by providing an agenda for further research.
References
Savignon SJ, 1991, Communicative Language Teaching: State of the Art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2): 261–277.
Richards JC, Schmidt RW, 2013, Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, Routledge, London.
Kinginger C, Savignon SJ, 2011, Four Conversations: Task Variation and Classroom Learner Discourse, in Language in School and Society: Policy and Pedagogy, De Gruyter Mouton, 85–106.
Dornyei Z, Ryan S, 2015, The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited, Routledge, London.
Gardner RC, Lambert WE, 1972, Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning, Newbury House Publishers, Rowley, MA.
Garrison DR, Kanuka H, 2004, Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2): 95–105.
Sharma P, 2010, Blended Learning. ELT Journal, 64(4): 456–458.
Hockly N, 2018, Blended Learning. ELT Journal, 72(1): 97–101.
Oliver M, Trigwell K, 2005, Can ‘Blended Learning’ Be Redeemed?. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1): 17–26.
Claypole M, 2016, Controversies in ELT?: What Do You Always Wanted to Know About Teaching English but Were Afraid to Ask. LinguaBooks, Hopwood Lane.
Fadde PJ, Vu P, 2014, Blended Online Learning: Benefits, Challenges, and Misconceptions, in Online Learning: Common Misconceptions, Benefits and Challenges, Nova Science Publishers, 33–48.
Vanslambrouck S, Zhu C, Lombaerts K, et al., 2018, Students’ Motivation and Subjective Task Value of Participating in Online and Blended Learning Environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 36: 33–40.
Law KM, Geng S, Li T, 2019, Student Enrollment, Motivation and Learning Performance in a Blended Learning Environment: The Mediating Effects of Social, Teaching, and Cognitive Presence. Computers & Education, 136: 1–12.
McKenzie WA, Perini E, Rohlf V, et al., 2013, A blended Learning Lecture Delivery Model for Large and Diverse Undergraduate Cohorts. Computers & Education, 64: 116–126.
Waha B, Davis K, 2014, University Students’ Perspective on Blended Learning. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(2): 172–182.
Ugur B, Akkoyunlu B, Kurbanoglu S, 2011, Students’ Opinions on Blended Learning and Its Implementation in Terms of Their Learning Styles. Education and Information Technologies, 16(1): 5–23.
Graham CR, 2006, Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions, in The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, John Wiley & Sons, 3–21.
Blake RJ, 2009, The Use of Technology for Second Language Distance Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93: 822–835.
Mizza D, Rubio F, 2020, Creating Effective Blended Language Learning Courses: A Research-based Guide from Planning to Evaluation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Arispe K, Blake RJ, 2012, Individual Factors and Successful Learning in a Hybrid Course. System, 40(4): 449–465.
Chenoweth NA, Ushida E, Murday K, 2006, Student Learning in Hybrid French and Spanish Courses: An Overview of Language Online. CALICO Journal, 24(1): 115–146.
Nicolson M, Murphy L, Southgate M, 2011, Language Teaching in Blended Contexts, Dunedin Academic Press, Edinburgh.
Gilbert SD, 2001, How to Be a Successful Online Student, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Haworth T, Parker R, 1995, The Contribution of a Face-to-Face Component in Initial Teacher Training at a Distance, in Distance Education for Language Teachers: A UK Perspective, Multilingual Matters, 78–94.
Twigg CA, 2003, Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Lessons Learned from Round I of the Pew Grant Program in Course Redesign, Centre for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
National Center for Academic Transformation, 2014, Redesign a College Course Using NCAT’s Technology, viewed June 2, 2022, https://www.thencat.org/Guides/AllDisciplines/How%20to%20Redesign%20A%20College%20Course.pdf