Contribution of International and Comparative Approach to the Policy and Practice of Teacher Education
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

International and comparative approach
International and comparative education
Teacher education
Policy and practice of teacher education

DOI

10.26689/jcer.v5i11.2744

Submitted : 2021-10-31
Accepted : 2021-11-15
Published : 2021-11-30

Abstract

This study intends to identify the value and pitfalls of international and comparative approach for the policy and practice of teacher education. The structure of this article proceeds as follows: the first section focuses on explaining the meaning and the values of international and comparative approach; based on previous discussions, the second section makes a more in-depth analysis of the values of international and comparative approach to teacher education from five key themes; the final section of this article proposes and interprets the drawbacks of international and comparative approach in teacher education.

References

Crossley M, Watson K, 2003, Comparative and International Research in Education: Globalisation, Context and Difference, Routledge Falmer, London and New York.

Held D, McGrew A, Goldblatt D, et al., 1999, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Bray M, 2003, Comparative Education in the Era of Globalisation: Evolution, Missions and Roles. Policy Futures in Education, 1(2): 209-224.

Elliott J, (eds) 2011, Reconstructing Teacher Education (Vol. 221), Routledge.

Darling-Hammond L, 2000, How Teacher Education Matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3): 166-173.

Kubow PK, Fossum PR, 2007, Comparative Education: Exploring Issues in International Context, Prentice Hall.

Schweisfurth M, 2014, Among the Comparativists: Ethnographic Observations. Comparative Education, 50(1): 102-111.

Philips D, Schweisfurth M, 2014, Comparative and International Education: An Introduction to Theory, Method, and Practice, Bloomsbury, New York.

Epstein EH, 2016, Why Comparative and International Education? Reflections on the Conflation of Names, Teaching Comparative Education: Trends and Issues Informing Practice, 57-73.

Wilson DN, 2003, The Future of Comparative and International Education in a Globalised World, in Comparative Education, Springer, Dordrecht, 15-33.

Bray M, 2007, International and Comparative Education: Boundaries, Ambiguities and Synergies, The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education, 51-56.

Fairbrother GP, 2005, Comparison to What End? Maximizing the Potential of Comparative Education Research. Comparative Education, 41(1): 5-24.

Noah HJ, 1984, The Use and Abuse of Comparative Education. Comparative Education Review, 28(4): 550-562.

Morris P, Williamson J, 2013, Teacher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Comparative Study, Routledge.

Lewis R, Romi S, Qui X, et al., 2005, Teachers’ Classroom Discipline and Student Misbehavior in Australia, China and Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6): 729-741.

Ding M, Li Y, Li X, et al., 2008, Chinese Teachers’ Perceptions of Students’ Classroom Misbehaviour. Educational Psychology, 28(3): 305-324.

You Z, Jia F, 2008, Do They Learn Differently? An Investigation of the Pre-Service Teachers from the US and China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4): 836-845.

Broadfoot P, 2000, Comparative Education for the 21st Century: Retrospect and Prospect. Comparative Education, 36(3): 357-371.

Young J, Hall C, Clarke T, 2007, Challenges to University Autonomy in Initial Teacher Education Programmes: The Cases of England, Manitoba and British Columbia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(1): 81-93.

Arnove RF, 2003, Introduction: Reframing Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local. Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, 2: 1-23.

Heinze A, Reiss K, 2007, Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, July 8-13, 2007: Mistake-Handling Activities in the Mathematics Classroom: Effects of an In-Service Teacher Training on Students’ Performance in Geometry, The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics The Republic of Korea, 9-16.

Kubow PK, Fossum PR, 2007, Comparative Education: Exploring Issues in International Context, Prentice Hall.

Darling-Hammond L, 2010, Teaching and Educational Transformation, in Second International Handbook of Educational Change, Springer, Dordrecht, 505-520.

Nóvoa A, Yariv-Mashal T, 2014, A Mode of Governance or a Historical Journey? World Yearbook of Education 2014: Governing Knowledge: Comparison, Knowledge-Based Technologies and Expertise in the Regulation of Education.

Owens TL, 2013, Thinking Beyond League Tables: A Review of Key PISA Research Questions. PISA, Power and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 23(1).