This paper examines how European lacework was reconfigured in modern China through missionary-led needlework education, women’s vocational craft training, regional textile traditions, and export-oriented production networks. Rather than treating drawnwork as a straightforward instance of Western transmission, this study argues that Chinese actors reshaped the craft through three interrelated mechanisms: pedagogy, technique, and production. Missionaries and church-affiliated institutions initially introduced lace-making as a form of informal vocational training for women in treaty-port regions, including Chaoshan, Yantai, and the lower Yangtze. Local artisans subsequently combined lace structures with Chinese embroidery techniques, creating new relationships among openwork, stitch systems, motifs, and compositional schemes. Finally, these training networks developed into dispersed production systems and export-oriented industries supported by merchants, the circulation of patterns, and regional specialization. By foregrounding mechanisms rather than exhaustive chronology, this paper shows that cross-cultural craft exchange operated through education, labor, and market mediation, thereby turning an imported technique into a localized craft industry in modern China.
Cai X, 2015, The Modern Chaoshan Church and the Rise of the Drawnwork Industry. Religious Studies, (4): 225–237.
Tang J, Cui Y, 2019, The Yantai Drawnwork Lace Industry in the Late Qing and Republican Periods. Urban History Research, (2): 130–143.
Baxter G, 2020, Hidden Hands and Missing Persons. Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, 18(1): 39–52.
Briggs-Goode A, Baxter G, Childs J, 2025, Nottingham Trent University Lace Archive: A Tantalising Array of Gaps Within a Complex Web of Threads. Fashion Theory. Advance online publication.
Hopkin D, 2020, Working, Singing, and Telling in the 19th-Century Flemish Pillow-Lace Industry. Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, 18(1): 53–68.
Makovicky N, 2025, Making Lace After Socialism: Creativity, Gender, and the Politics of the Commons. East European Politics and Societies, 39(4).
Thorburn M, Stolz SA, 2023, Where Merleau-Ponty Meets Dewey: Habit, Embodiment, and Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 42: 599–615.
Dewey J, 1916, Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Macmillan.
Campeotto F, Saharrea JM, Viale CM, 2023, Art as Occupations: Two Neglected Roots of John Dewey’s Aesthetics. The Pluralist, 18(2): 1–25.
d’Agnese V, 2023, Experience, Art and Education in John Dewey: Overturning the Relationship between Aesthetic and Theoretical Dimension in Education. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica: Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 18(1): 73–85.
Dewey J, 1938, Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
Fisher T, Botticello J, 2016, Machine-Made Lace, the Spaces of Skilled Practices and the Paradoxes of Contemporary Craft Production. Cultural Geographies. Advance online publication.
Yao J, Jiang G, Liu T, et al, 2011, Origin and Development of Modern Shanghai Knotted Lace. Journal of Silk, 48(8): 50–53.
Liu L, Xu M, Xu Y, 2019, Technical Characteristics and Inheritance of Xiaoshan Lace in Hangzhou. Journal of Silk, 56(9): 91–96.
Liu Y, Dai W, 2023, A Comparative Study of the Traditional Craft Characteristics and Structures of China’s Four Major Drawnwork Traditions. Footwear Technology and Design, 3(9): 120–123.
Yin B, 2020, Modern Sino-Western Traditional Craft Exchange from the Perspective of Shandong Drawnwork. Art & Design Research, (3): 65–70.
Wang X, Yuan X, 2017, A Comparative Analysis of the Development and Aesthetic Features of Gauze and Lace. Journal of Silk, 54(4): 65–72.
Feng S, 2024, The Influence of Foreign Trade Changes on Drawnwork Design in the Early Reform Era: The Case of Shanghai Embroidery Factory. Zhuangshi, (10): 20–24.
UNESCO, 2021, The School of Living Traditions (SLT), Register of Good Safeguarding Practices. UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage.