Research on the Construction and Practice of an Evidence-Based Value-Added Evaluation System Based on Data-Driven
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Data-driven
Evidence-based evaluation
Value-added evaluation
Large model
Educational evaluation reform

DOI

10.26689/jcer.v9i5.10746

Submitted : 2025-05-06
Accepted : 2025-05-21
Published : 2025-06-05

Abstract

Based on the educational evaluation reform, this study explores the construction of an evidence-based value-added evaluation system based on data-driven, aiming to solve the limitations of traditional evaluation methods. The research adopts the method of combining theoretical analysis and practical application, and designs the evidence-based value-added evaluation framework, which includes the core elements of a multi-source heterogeneous data acquisition and processing system, a value-added evaluation agent based on a large model, and an evaluation implementation and application mechanism. Through empirical research verification, the evaluation system has remarkable effects in improving learning participation, promoting ability development, and supporting teaching decision-making, and provides a theoretical reference and practical path for educational evaluation reform in the new era. The research shows that the evidence-based value-added evaluation system based on data-driven can reflect students’ actual progress more fairly and objectively by accurately measuring the difference in starting point and development range of students, and provide strong support for the realization of high-quality education development.

References

Zhang M, 2020, Education Evaluation Reform and School Transformation. Educational Research, 41(6): 4–11.

The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, The State Council, 2020, The Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Education Evaluation in the New Era, viewed March 25, 2025, https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm

Liu T, Wang Z, 2019, The Reform and Reconstruction of Education Evaluation in the Era of Big Data. Educational Research, 40(7): 143–150.

Sanders WL, Horn SP, 1994, The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed-Model Methodology in Educational Assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8: 299–311.

Sanders WL, 1998, Value-Added Assessment. School Administrator, 55(11): 24–27.

Yang B, Li W, 2021, The Theoretical Basis and Practical Path of Value-Added Evaluation. Educational Research, 42(5): 88–97.

Slavin RE, 2002, Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7): 15–21.

Siemens G, Baker RSJD, 2012, Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining: Towards Communication and Collaboration, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 252–254.

Chen M, Zhang J, 2020, Technological Progress and Application Status of Educational Big Data Analysis. China Educational Technology, 2020(9): 12–19.

Wang S, Xu T, Li H, et al., 2024, Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlook. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.18105

Huang R, Yang J, 2022, Intelligent Education Evaluation: Connotation, Technology and Path. E-Education Research, 43(2): 5–12.

Qian M, Zhao L, 2023, Big Data Empowering Undergraduate Teaching Quality Evaluation: Value Implication, Realistic Dilemma and Path Choice. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 11(2): 57–66.

Wright R, Yang J, 2023, AI-Enabled Formative Assessment: A Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 196: 104794.

Chai T, Gao J, Zhao M, et al., 2024, Thoughts on the Construction of the Evaluation System for the Quality of Postgraduate Cultivation Based on Value-Added Evaluation. Computer Education, 2024(01): 46–50.

Morgan J, Stone L, 2023, Evidence-Based Decision Making in Educational Leadership. Educational Leadership Review, 24(1): 83–97.