Today, the ever-emerging educational technologies have a massive effect on the teaching-learning processes worldwide. With diverse needs in learning, there is a high demand for a cross-cultural enquiry to establish ways in which different educational needs could be met explicitly. The following cases highlighted the different approaches across the regions while relating them to the cultural and institutional environments that influence the adoption of these technologies. For instance, a simple strategy cannot be applied in all contexts given the wide impact on cultural learning and teaching. From continents such as North America, Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America, varying cultural, educational, and institutional cases illustrate that cultural and institutional contexts influence technology adoption strategies and outcomes. For example, in the classroom, the interactive tools, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality models force the educator to adopt a new role as the students require maximal engagement and relevant integration of the tools in teaching and learning. Additionally, the technology that these learners integrate has a massive impact on educator training and assessment methods and strategies. For instance, robots for teaching preprimary learners require training such that they facilitate and are not used in the teaching and learning process. On the other hand, students’ academic and social development outcomes are affected by their integration as more focus is given to the learner in the classroom: educational opportunities can be tailored to fit the needs of the learners to meet the objectives without reducing the teacher-student time. In the global context, cultural education differences have been narrowed to fit the learners’ needs, which leads to separate learner-centered teaching in the region.
Mangal S, Mangal U, 2019, Essentials of Educational Technology. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Zmigrodzka M, 2017, Development of Virtual Reality Technology in the Aspect of Educational Applications. Marketing of Scientist and Research Organizations, 26(4): 117–133.
Abad-Segura E, Gonzalez-Zamar MD, Rosa AL, et al., 2020, Sustainability of Educational Technologies: An Approach to Augmented Reality Research. Sustainability, 12(10): 4091.
Zhai X, 2021, A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021: 1–18.
Flores AM, Demsas F, Leeper NJ, et al., 2021, Leveraging Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Peripheral Artery Disease Detection, Treatment, And Outcomes. Circulation Research, 128(12): 1833–1850.
Tan S, 2023, Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Education, in Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies: Cultural and Social Engineering Perspectives. Springer, Berlin, 335–363.
Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z, 2020, Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 2020(8): 75264–75278.
Demir K, Ellett CD, 2014, Cross-cultural Research and Perspectives on Epistemology, Learning Environments, and Culture, in The Role of Science Teachers’ Beliefs in International Classrooms. Brill, 65–79.
Lee LYS, 2016, Hospitality Industry Web-based Self-service Technology Adoption Model: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 40(2): 162–197.
Mahrous AA, Ahmed A, 2010, A Cross-cultural Investigation of Students’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Tools: The Middle East, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(3): 289–306.
Zhu C, Valcke M, Schellens T, 2010, A Cross‐cultural Study of Teacher Perspectives on Teacher Roles and Adoption of Online Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2): 147–165.
Anis M, 2023, Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Inclusive English Language Teaching: Strategies and Implications for Learner Diversity. Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 12(6): 54–70.
Alam A, 2023, Harnessing the Power of AI to Create Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Enhanced Classroom Experience and Improved Learning Outcomes, in Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks. Springer, Berlin, 571–591.
Alam A, 2023, Leveraging the Power of “Modeling and Computer Simulation” for Education: An Exploration of its Potential for Improved Learning Outcomes and Enhanced Student Engagement, in 2023 International Conference on Device Intelligence, Computing and Communication Technologies (DICCT). IEEE, 445–450.
Mayer RE, 2020, Designing Multimedia Instruction in Anatomy: An Evidence‐based Approach. Clinical Anatomy, 33(1): 2–11.
Patra KC, 2022, Use of TPACK Framework to Enhance the Efficacy of Online Learning in Higher Education. TechnoLEARN: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1): 1–12.
Koehler M, Mishra P, 2009, What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1): 60–70.
Ollesch J, Grünig F, Dörfler T, 2017, Teaching Mathematics with Multimedia-based Representations: What about Teachers’ Competencies? CERME 10, 2017.
Harris J, Mishra P, Koehler M, 2009, Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types: Curriculum-based Technology Integration Reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4): 393–416.
Rienties B, Nanclares NH, Jindal-Snape D, et al., 2013, The Role of Cultural Background and Team Divisions in Developing Social Learning Relations in the Classroom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(4): 332–353.
Sam DL, Berry JW, Acculturation: When Individuals and Groups of Different Cultural Backgrounds Meet. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4): 472– 481.
Hmelo-Silver CE, Chinn CA, 2015, Collaborative Learning, in Handbook of Educational Psychology. Routledge, 363–377.
Zybert J, Lehman I, 2019, Developing Communicative Competence in L2 Tertiary Level Students: Remarks on Culturally Responsive Teaching. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, 2019(18): 267–275.
O’Sullivan ML, Samarawickrema G, 2008. Changing Learning and Teaching Relationships in the Educational Technology Landscape. Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne, 711–714.
Cho Y, Park S, Jo SJ, et al., 2013, The Landscape of Educational Technology Viewed from the ETR & D Journal. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5): 677–694.
Antoniou CG, Ioannou A, 2018, Technology for Social Change in School Contexts: A New Landscape for K-12 Educational Technology Research. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6): 2363–2378.
Lefoe GE, Olney I, Herrington A, 2008, Enabling Teaching, Enabling Learning: How Does Staff Development Fit the Educational Technology Landscape?, thesis, University of Wollongong.
Collins A, Halverson R, 2018, Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. Teachers College Press, New York.
Luftman J, Lyytinen K, Zvi TB, 2017, Enhancing the Measurement of Information Technology (IT) Business Alignment and its Influence on Company Performance. Journal of Information Technology, 2017(32): 26–46.
Kumar Bhowmik M, Ping Lim C, Smith M, et al., 2018, Digital Learning for Developing Asian Countries: Achieving Equity, Quality and Efficiency in Education, in Routledge International Handbook of Schools and Schooling in Asia. Taylor & Francis.
Feijóo C, 2021, Educational Technologies in China. Pre-and Post-Pandemic Lessons (No. JRC124648). JT Res Centre (Seville site), 2021.
Tripathy S, Devarapalli S, 2021, Emerging Trend Set by Start‐ups on Indian Online Education System: A Case of Byju’s. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1): e2128.
Pérez Cañado ML, 2023, Inclusion And Diversity in Bilingual Education: A European Comparative Study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(9): 1129–1145.
Wollny S, 2023, Students’ Expectations of Learning Analytics Across Europe. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(4): 1325–1338.
Barbero I, Rezgui Y, Petri I, 2023, A European-wide Exploratory Study to Analyse the Relationship between Training and Energy Efficiency in the Construction Sector. Environment Systems and Decisions, 43(3): 337–357.
Ezumah BA, 2020, Critical Perspectives of Educational Technology in Africa: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation. Springer, Berlin.
Kayode SO, 2023, Breaking Barriers: Innovative Strategies for Access to Education in Underserved Communities.
Kenski VM, Santos GL, 2019, Qualitative Research on Educational Technology in Latin America, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Lee SG, Trimi S, Kim C, 2013, The Impact of Cultural Differences on Technology Adoption. Journal of World Business, 48(1): 20–29.
Huang FT, Teo JC, Sanchez-Prieto J, et al., 2019, Cultural Values and Technology Adoption: A Model Comparison with University Teachers from China and Spain. Computers & Education, 2019(133): 69–81.
Borkovich DJ, Skovira RJ, Breese-Vitelli J, 2015, New Technology Adoption: Embracing Cultural Influences. Issues in Information Systems, 2015(16): 3.
Özbilen P, 2017, The Impact of Natural Culture on New Technology Adoption by Firms: A Country Level Analysis. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2017(8): 299–305.
Panicker P, 2020, Embedding Culture and Grit in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for Higher Education. arXiv, preprint, 11973.
Treviño-Eberhard D, Kaufmann-Kuchta K, 2022, Does it Make a Difference? Relations of Institutional Frameworks and the Regional Provision of Continuing Higher Education in England and Spain. Education sciences, 12(2): 132.
Bley DHP, 2018, Panorama dos Elementos Influenciadores do Processo da Adoção de Tecnologias Por Professores, thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
Morel GM, Spector JM, 2022, Foundations of Educational Technology: Integrative Approaches and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge, 2022.
Akhter H, Abdul Rahman AA, Jafrin N, et al., 2022, Investigating the Barriers that Intensify Undergraduates’ Unwillingness to Online Learning during COVID-19: A Study on Public Universities in a Developing Country. Cogent Education, 9(1): 2028342.
Hebebci MT, Bertiz Y, Alan S, 2020, Investigation of Views of Students and Teachers on Distance Education Practices during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4): 267–282.
Iaosanurak C, Chanchalor S, Murphy E, 2016, Social and Emotional Learning around Technology in a Cross-Cultural, Elementary Classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 2016(21): 1639–1662.
Kayalar F, 2016, Cross-Cultural Comparison of Teachers’ Views upon Integration and Use of Technology in the Classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(2): 11–19.
Alvarez C, Salavati S, Nussbaum M, et al., 2013, Collboard: Fostering new Media Literacies in the Classroom through Collaborative Problem Solving Supported by Digital Pens and Interactive Whiteboards. Computers & Education, 2013(63): 368–379.
Fuchs K, 2021, Preparing Students for Success in a Changing World: The Role of Virtual Whiteboards in the Modern Classroom. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(1): 151–158.
Yuill N, Yuill N, 2021, Collaborative Technology in the Classroom. Technology to Support Children’s Collaborative Interactions. Close Encounters of the Shared Kind, 83–104.
Gunn AA, 2021, Revisiting Culturally Responsive Teaching Practices for Early Childhood Preservice Teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 42(3): 265–280.
Munir H, Vogel B, Jacobsson A, 2022, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approaches in Digital Education. A Systematic Revision, Information, 13(4): 203.
Tedre M, 2021, Teaching Machine Learning in K–12 Classroom: Pedagogical and Technological Trajectories for Artificial Intelligence Education. IEEE Access, 2021(9): 110558–110572.
Bai JY, Zawacki-Richter O, Muskens W, 2022, Developing Strategic Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education. 5th International Open and Distance Learning Conference Proceedings Book, 47–70.
Iatsyshyn AV, 2020, Application of Augmented Reality Technologies for Preparation of Specialists of new Technological Era. Conference: 2nd International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education.
Garzón J, 2021, An Overview of Twenty-five Years of Augmented Reality in Education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(7): 37.
Hamilton D, McKechnie J, Edgerton E, et al., Immersive Virtual Reality as a Pedagogical Tool in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Quantitative Learning Outcomes and Experimental Design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1): 1–32.
Fernández-Batanero JM, Román-Graván P, Reyes-Rebollo MM, et al., 2021, Impact of Educational Technology on Teacher Stress and Anxiety: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2): 548.
Annamalai N, Ramayah T, Kumar JA, et al., 2021, Investigating the Use of Learning Management System (LMS) for Distance Education in Malaysia: A Mixed-method Approach. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3): ep313.
Garzón J, Baldiris S, Gutiérrez J, et al., 2020, How do Pedagogical Approaches Affect the Impact of Augmented Reality on Education? A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. Educational Research Review, 2020(31): 100334.
Susanto R, Rachmadtullah R, Rachbini W, 2020, Technological and Pedagogical Models. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2): 1–14.
Schmid M, Brianza E, Petko D, 2021, Self-reported Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of Pre-service Teachers in relation to Digital Technology Use in Lesson Plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021(115): 106586.
Romijn BR, Slot PL, Leseman PP, 2021, Increasing Teachers’ Intercultural Competences in Teacher Preparation Programs and through Professional Development: A Review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2021(98): 103236.
Popova A, Evans DK, Breeding ME, et al., 2022, Teacher Professional Development around the World: The Gap between Evidence and Practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1): 107–136.
Sancar R, Atal D, Deryakulu D, 2021, A New Framework for Teachers’ Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2021(101): 103305.
Penner-Williams J, Diaz EI, Worthen DG, 2019, Sustainability of Teacher Growth from Professional Development in Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Instructional Practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2019(86): 102891.
Hali AU, Zhang B, Al-Qadri AH, et al., 2021, A Collaborative Teacher Training Approach in Different Cultures in the Era of Technology. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4): 21–32.
DeMonte J, 2013, High-Quality Professional Development for Teachers: Supporting Teacher Training to Improve Student Learning. Center for American Progress, 2013.
Shi JJ, 2022, Tech-integration in Vocational Business English Teaching: A Review. Higher Education and Oriental Studies, 2(3): 40–52.
Shirley ML, Irving KE, 2015, Connected Classroom Technology Facilitates Multiple Components of Formative Assessment Practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015(24): 56–68.
Barrett M, 2019, Artificial Intelligence Supported Patient Self-care in Chronic Heart Failure: A Paradigm Shift from Reactive to Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Care. Epma Journal, 2019(10): 445–464.
Capuano N, Caballé S, 2020, Adaptive Learning Technologies. AI Magazine, 41(2): 96–98.
Muñoz JLR, 2022, Systematic Review of Adaptive Learning Technology for Learning in Higher Education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2022(98): 221–233.
Naik G, Chitre C, Bhalla M, et al., 2020, Impact of Use of Technology on Student Learning Outcomes: Evidence from a Large-scale Experiment in India. World Development, 2020(127): 104736.
Taha TB, Abdulrahman MS, 2023, The Impact of Technology on Students’ Psychological and Educational Performance. JISA (JurnalInformatika dan Sains), 6(1): 91–95.
Nora A, Snyder BP, 2008, Technology and Higher Education: The Impact of E-learning Approaches on Student Academic Achievement, Perceptions and Persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10(1): 3–19.