Analysis of Policy Change in the Implementation Process
Download PDF

Keywords

Policy implementation
Goal ambiguity
Street-level bureaucrats
Discretion

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v4i6.3986

Submitted : 2022-05-21
Accepted : 2022-06-05
Published : 2022-06-20

Abstract

Policy implementation, refers to putting policy intentions into effect. This process largely depends on the interactions between the implementers and their service users, partners, and superiors. The reasons for policy change can be attributed to three aspects. Firstly, varied contextual conditions require changing policy measures adapted to different situations, and vague policy goals that permeate the policy process provide the prerequisite for policy deformation. Secondly, policy delivery agencies, who lack resources and supervision, “decode” policy goals based on practical contexts and arrange the tasks. Thirdly, street-level bureaucrats use discretion based on working attributes and personal factors. Finally, these factors from multiple layers interact and result in policy changes in the implementation process. This article illustrates the macro-level implementation environment and the meso-level implementation institutions, which compose the prerequisite conditions for policy implementation, as well as micro-level implementers, who play key roles in shaping policies. This comprehensive analytical structure is helpful to determine the effectiveness of public policies.

References

Anderson JE, 1975, Public Policy-Making, Praeger, New York, 79.

Lipsky M, 2010, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 12-29.

Zhan X, Lo CWH, Tang SY, 2014, “Contextual Changes and Environmental Policy Implementation: A Longitudinal Study of Street-Level Bureaucrats in Guangzhou, China.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4): 1005-1035.

Matland RE, 1995, “Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2): 145-174.

Hill MJ, Hupe PL, 2002, Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice, Sage Publications, London, 1.

UK Government, 2014, City Deals. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/city-deals

O’Brien KJ, Li L, 1999, “Selective Policy Implementation in Rural China.” Comparative politics, 31(2): 167-186.

Ackrill R, Kay A, Zahariadis N, 2013, “Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6): 871-887.

Hogwood BW, Gunn LA, 1984, Policy Analysis for the Real World, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Hill MJ, 2014, The Public Policy Process, London, Routledge.

Nilsson P, 2019, UK Police Test if Computer can Predict Criminal Behaviour, Financial Times, Feb 6, 2022. https://www.ft.com/content/9559efbe-2958-11e9-a5ab-ff8ef2b976c7

Bergen A, While A, 2005, ‘Implementation Deficit’ and ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy:’ Policy, Practice and Change in the Development of Community Nursing Issues.” Health & Social Care in The Community, 13(1): 1-10.