A Study on Optimization Design of User Experience of Interface Icon of Science Popularization App for School-age Children Based on Logistic Regression Analysis
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Popular science app
Ordinal logistic regression analysis
School-age children
Interface icon design

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v6i12.9212

Submitted : 2024-12-07
Accepted : 2024-12-22
Published : 2025-01-06

Abstract

In this study, logistic regression analysis, orthogonal experimental design, user experience evaluation, and A/B testing are used to explore the key design factors of children’s app icons and make suggestions for optimization. Firstly, user information is collected through a questionnaire survey, and the core elements affecting users’ adoption willingness are analyzed by logistic regression. Second, orthogonal experimental design is used to evaluate the influence of function combinations on users’ preferences and screen the optimal function configuration. Once again, the user experience method is used to collect feedback on actual use, evaluate usability, ease of use, and satisfaction, and propose improvement measures. Finally, the A/B test verifies the effectiveness of the optimization scheme. Taking children’s science apps as the research object, the results show that the methodological framework proposed in this study significantly improves user experience and provides designers with a way to accurately understand children’s preferences and needs and develop high-quality science apps.

References

Norman DA, 2007, Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.

Liu W, Cao Y, Proctor RW, 2021, How do App Icon Color and Border Shape Influence Visual Search Efficiency and User Experience? Evidence from an Eye-tracking Study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2021(84): 103160.

Demirtas EA, Anagun AS, Koksal G, 2009, Determination of Optimal Product Styles by Ordinal Logistic Regression Versus Conjoint Analysis for Kitchen Faucets. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(5): 866–875.

Suriya K, Siriporn S, 2011, Binary Logit Analysis of Souvenir Design Preferences by International Tourists to Northern Thailand. Thailand Econometrics Society, 3(3): 239–246.

Park S, Kim HK, Park J, et al., 2023, Designing and Evaluating User Experience of an AI-Based Defense System. IEEE Access, 2023(11): 122045–122056.

Chen X, Sun L, 2021, Evaluating E-commerce Platform User Interfaces with Logistic Regression: A Usability Study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2021(59): 102424.

Cui WG, Li XH, Zhou SB, et al., 2007, Investigation on Process Parameters of Electrospinning System through Orthogonal Experimental Design. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 103(5): 3105–3112.

Ji LJ, Si YF, Liu HF, et al.,2014, Application of Orthogonal Experimental Design in Synthesis of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 184(2014): 122–126.

Tidwell J, 2010, Designing Interfaces: Patterns for Effective Interaction Design. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Wu TT, Li P, 2019, Interface Design of Children’s Education App Home Page Based on Emotion Measurement. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 573(1): 012110.

Kamaruzaman MF, Nurdalilah MR, Harrinni MN, et al., 2016, Developing User Interface Design Application for Children with Autism. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016(217): 887–894.

Aziz NAA, Batmaz F, Stone R, et al., 2013, Selection of Touch Gestures for Children’s Applications. 2013 Science and Information Conference, 721–726.

Fletcher-Watson S, Pain H, Hammond S, et al., 2016, Designing for Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Case Study of an iPad App.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2016(7): 1–14.

Radesky JS, Weeks HM, Ball R, et al., 2017, Young Children’s Use of Smartphones and Tablets. Pediatrics, 146(1): e20193518.

Anas NH, Mahayuddin ZR, 2017, Aiding Autistic Children Learn Arabic through Developing an Engaging User-friendly Android App. Autism, 9(10): 11.