Past studies have examined Shakespeare’s historical plays through the lenses of political theory in multiple ways, focusing primarily on formal access to policymaking — official, structured channels of influence. This paper hereby uses Volumnia from Shakespeare’s Coriolanus as a model to examine the attainment of effective political agency through the perspective of a politician with only informal access to policymaking. Volumnia’s success in preserving the city of Rome contrasts with the failed attempts by other male characters’ sole reliance on formal political channels. Through her interactions with her son Coriolanus, a politician with formal access to policymaking, she exemplifies how effective political agency can be achieved by her use of rhetoric, body language, and indirect influence to manipulate politicians with authority to achieve her private political pursuits. Volumnia’s certified success under a patriarchal narrative exemplifies possibilities for politically marginalized minorities in modern society, especially the female body.
West WF, 2009, Inside the Black Box. Administration & Society, 41(5): 576–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399709339013
Radnitz S, 2011, Informal Politics and the State. Comparative Politics, 43(3): 351–371. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041511795274922
Giddens A, 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, California.
Burrell DB, MacIntyre A, 1984, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Journal of Law and Religion, 2(1): 216. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051043
Coole D, 2017, Agency, Political Science & Governance. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/agency-political-theory
Clark IL, 2019, Audiences, in Concepts in Composition. Routledge, New York, 119–158. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203728659-4
Baber WF, Bartlett RV, 2021, Empowered Democratic Agency in the Anthropocene: Reconciling People to Nature and Each Other, in Democratic Norms of Earth System Governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108923651.003
Dellas E, Pattberg P, Betsill M, 2011, Agency in Earth System Governance: Refining a Research Agenda. International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics, 11(1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-011-9147-9
Wudel D, 2002, Shakespeare’s Coriolanus in the Political Science Classroom. PS Political Science & Politics, 35(2): 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096502000549
Hamamra BT, 2020, Mothers of Martyrs: Rethinking Shakespeare’s Volumnia’s Collective Motherhood from a Palestinian Perspective. Psychodynamic Practice, 26(3): 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2020.1762715
Gupta A, 2022, Societal Control and Women: A Study of Select Shakespearean Plays. Gap Bodhi Taru — A Global Journal of Humanities, 5(2): 36–38. https://doi.org/10.47968/gapbodhi.520009
Gamel M, 1999, Staging Ancient Drama: The Difference Women Make. Syllecta Classica, 10(1): 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/syl.1999.0013
Kahn C, 1992, Mother of Battles: Volumnia and her Son in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus. Differences, 4(2): 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-4-2-154
Folger Shakespeare Library, 2024, Coriolanus. Folger Digital Texts, retrieved from https://shakespeare.folger.edu/