A Study on the Relationship between the Characteristics of Children’s Language Acquisition and the Intrinsic Structural Features of Language: Take the Acquisition of Semantic Types of Double Object Constructions as an Example
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Children’s language acquisition
Language structural features
Double object constructions
Semantic type

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v6i11.8783

Submitted : 2024-11-03
Accepted : 2024-11-18
Published : 2024-12-03

Abstract

The double object constructions in language have different semantic types, which represent meanings such as giving, obtaining, and communication. The semantic types vary among different languages. Some semantic types are common to languages, while others are unique to certain languages. The quantitative distribution pattern of semantic types of double object constructions in languages is an external manifestation of the internal structural features of languages. This paper attempts to explore the relationship between children’s acquisition characteristics of semantic types and the intrinsic structural features of language through corpus research methods. The study found that there is a parallel relationship between them, that is, children usually acquire semantic types that reflect language commonalities earlier, while acquire semantic types that reflect language personality differences later.

References

Gropen J, Pinker S, Hollander M, 1989, The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English. Language, 65(2): 203–257.

Chan A, 2003, The Development of bei2 Dative Constructions in Early Child Cantonese, thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Zhang J, 2010, A Case Study on the Acquisition of Dative/Double-Object Constructions in Modern Chinese, thesis, Tianjin Normal University.

Li J, 2012, A Comparative Study of Children’s Acquisition of Dative/Double-Object Constructions, thesis, Tianjin Normal University.

Zhou GG, 1997, Research on the Acquisition of Chinese Syntactic Structures. Anhui University Press, Anhui.

Goldberg AE, Casenhiser DM, Sethuraman N, 2004, Learning Argument Structure Generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3): 289–316.

Zou LZ, 2012, A Case Study on the Acquisition of “Gei” Sentences in Early Mandarin Children. Chinese Teaching in the World, 26(4): 560–573.

Liang YX, 2017, A Study on the Comprehension of Double Object Construction with “Gei” in Early Mandarin Children, thesis, Capital Normal University.

Wang Q, 2017, A Study on the Acquisition of Giving Class Double Object Construction in Chinese Children, thesis, Xiangtan University.

Zhang YQ, Gao L, Wang C, 2018, Children’s Language Acquisition with Chinese Ditransitive Constructions. Contemporary Linguistics, 20(3): 334–356.

Campbell AL, Tomasello M, 2001, The Acquisition of English Dative Constructions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2001(22): 253–267.

MacWhinney B, Snow C, 1990, The Child Language Data Exchange System: An Update. Journal of Child Language, 1990(17): 457–472.

Malehukov A, Haspelmath M, Comrie B, 2010, Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Jakobson R, MacMahon MKC, 1968, Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals. Mouton, Hague.

Wu TP, 1990, A Comparative Study on the History of Linguistics between China and Foreign Countries: A Discussion on the Significance of Linguistic Typology in the Study of Chinese History. Chinese Teaching in the World, 1990(2): 71–79.