Response Mechanism of Human Resource Management Digital Technology Based on Employee’s Perspective: Model Construction and Management Suggestion
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Human resource management digital technology
Cognition
Emotional experience
Adaptation
Resistance

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v6i6.7367

Submitted : 2024-06-11
Accepted : 2024-06-26
Published : 2024-07-11

Abstract

With the rapid development of information technology, digital human resource management (DHRM) has become an important direction of enterprise management innovation. Based on related literature research, this study defines the connotation of digital human resource management. Based on the perspective of employees, from the four dimensions of cognitive, emotional experience, adaptation, and resistance, this study expounds that digital technology in improving the positive role of human resource management efficiency has not yet been fully utilized to build the digital response mechanism based on employee perspective of human resource management model. The research suggests that the relationship between organizational quantitative calculation and employee personal value proposition should be properly handled well, and the relationship between organization monitoring and employee privacy protection should be maintained.

References

Li P, Yang ZY, 2018, Organizational Management Changes in the Digital Age. Economic Science, 2018(1): 12–20.

Stone DL, Deadrick DL, Lukaszewski KM, et al., 2015, The Influence of Technology on the Future of Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2): 216– 231.

Arnaud S, Chandon J, 2013, Will Monitoring Systems Kill Intrinsic Motivation? An Empirical Study. Revue De Gestion Des Ressources Humaines, 90(4): 35–53.

Carlson JR, Carlson DS, Zivnuska S, et al., 2017, Applying the Job Demands Resources Model to Understand Technology as A Predictor of Turnover Intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 77(1): 317–325.

Piccoli G, Ahmad R, Ives B, 2001, Web-Based Virtual Learning Environments: A Research Framework and A Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic IT Skills Training, MIS Quarterly, 25(4): 401–426.

Rrimer U, 2023, The Impact of Digital Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Research, 73(2): 281–290.

Lawler EE, 2022, Employee Engagement and Its Impact on Performance: A Study of Digital Human Resource Management Practices. Human Resource Management Review, 22(4): 397–401.

Jin J, 2024, Digital Human Resource Management. China Renmin University Press, Beijing.

Parry E, Tyson S, 2011, Desired Goals and Actual Outcomes of E-HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3), 335–354

Orlikowski WJ, 2000, Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11(4): 404–428.

Leonardi PM, 2011, When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1): 147–167.

Xie XY, Zuo YH, Hu QJ, 2021, Human Resource Management in the Digital Age: Based on the Perspective of the Interaction between People and Technology. Management World, 37(1): 200–216.

Bies RJ, Moag JF, 1986, Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness, in Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, 43–55. JAI Press, Greenwich.

Arnaud S, Chandon J, 2013, Will Monitoring Systems Kill Intrinsic Motivation? An Empirical Study. Revue De Gestion Des Ressources Humaines, 90(4): 35–53.

Stanton JM, Julian AL, 2002, The Impact of Electronic Monitoring on Quality and Quantity of Performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1): 85–101.

Boehm KJ, Alexander N, Anderson J, et al., 2017, Assembly and Metrology of NIF Target Subassemblies Using Robotic Systems. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017(5): e25.

Jeske D, Santuzzi AM, 2015, Monitoring What and How: Psychological Implications of Electronic Performance Monitoring. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30(1): 62–78.

Claggett JL, Karahanna E, 2018, Unpacking the Structure of Coordination Mechanisms and the Role of Relational Coordination in An Era of Digitally Mediated Work Processes. Academy of Management Review, 43(4): 704–722.

Gibson CB, Gibbs JL, 2006, Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3): 451–495.

Leonardi PM, 2018, Social Media and The Development of Shared Cognition: The Roles of Network Expansion, Content Integration, and Triggered Recalling. Organization Science, 29(4): 547–568.

Monzani L, Ripoll P, Peiró JM, et al., 2014, Loafing in the Digital Age: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in the Relation Between Perceived Loafing and Group Affective Outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 33(1): 279–285.

Wang B, Liu Y, Parker SK, 2020, How Does the Use of Information Communication Technology Affect Individuals? A Work Design Perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2): 695–725.

Weatherbee TG, 2010, Counterproductive Use of Technology at Work: Information & Communications Technologies and Cyberdeviancy. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1): 35–44.

Park Y, Fritz C, Jex SM, 2018, Daily Cyber Incivility and Distress: The Moderating Roles of Resources at Work and Home. Journal of Management, 44(7): 2535–2557.

Colbert A, Yee N, George G, 2016, The Digital Workforce and the Workplace of the Future. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3): 731–739.

Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A, 2020, Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1): 366–410.

Lv F, Li HQ, 2017, Is the Era of Abandoning Humanized Management Coming? Tsinghua Management Review, 2017(09): 32–37.

Rosenblat A, Stark L, 2016, Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10(1): 3758–3784.

Raisch S, Krakowski S, 2020, Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1): 192–210.

Collins PD, Ryan LV, Matusik SF, 1999, Programmable Automation and the Locus of Decision-Making Power. Journal of Management, 25(1): 29–53.

Boudreau M, Robey D, 2005, Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective. Organization Science, 16(1): 3–18.

Leonardi PM, 2011, When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1): 147–167.

Orlikowski WJ,1992, The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3): 398–427

Bhave DP, Teo LH, Dalal RS, 2020, Privacy at Work: A Review and A Research Agenda for A Contested Terrain. Journal of Management, 46(1): 127–164.

Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G, 2015, Privacy and Human Behavior in the Age of Information. Science, 347(6221): 509–514.