Keywords
High-quality development
Development measurement system
Submitted : 2024-06-12
Accepted : 2024-06-27
Published : 2024-07-12
Abstract
Based on the connotation of high-quality development and the five new development concepts of “innovation, coordination, greenness, openness, and sharing”, this paper constructs a three-level indicator measurement system for the level of high-quality development of a city. Using the respective advantages of the entropy value method and CRITIC method, the weights of indicators are assigned at different levels. At the same time, the TOPSIS method is combined to measure the level of urban development and get the ranking of national cities in terms of high-quality development level. By analyzing the weights of the indicators, the direction that should be emphasized in the high-quality development of Chinese cities is further analyzed.
References
Kamaev BD, 1983, Speed and Quality of Economic Growth. Hubei People’s Publishing House, Wuhan.
Solow RM, A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983(1): 65–94.
Yi F, Li Y, 2003, Theoretical Considerations on China’s Economic Growth and Total Factor Productivity. Economic Research, 2003(8): 8.
Wei M, Li SH, 2018, A Study on Measuring the Level of High-quality Development of China’s Economy in the New Era. Research on Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics, 35(11): 3–20.
Gonzalez MS, Rivero YR, Valladares ORD, 2020, Considerations on Local Development. Revista Universidad Y Sociedad, 12(4): 309–315.
Shi B, Ren BP, 2018, Measurement and Analysis of High-quality Development of China’s Interprovincial Economy. Economic Issues 2018(04): 1–6.
Ma R, Luo H, Wang HW, et al., 2019, Research on Evaluation Index System and Measurement of High-quality Development of Chinese Regional Economy. China Soft Science, 2019(7): 8.
Yang YW, Zhang P, 2021, The Logic, Measurement and Governance of China’s High-Quality Economic Development. Economic Research, 56(1): 26–42.
Zhang T, 2020, Research on the Theoretical Interpretation and Measurement Method of High-quality Development. Research on Quantitative and Technical Economics, 37(05): 23–43.
Wang W, Fan CP, Qin, YG, 2022, Construction and Empirical Measurement of Economic High-quality Development Indicator System. Statistics and Decision Making, 38(03): 124–128.
Yan S, Wang QY, Zhang L, et al., 2024, Evaluation of China’s High-Quality Development Level and Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Characteristics. Statistics and Decision Making, 40(02): 111–117.
Xiu Z, Zhang YF, Zhang ZG, 2024, The Level of High-quality Development of China’s Economy: Measurement, Spatial and Temporal Evolution, and Dynamic Spatial Convergence. Explorations in Economic Issues 2024(01): 15–37.
Li SY, Wu CC, 2023, Research on Evaluation Indicator System and Measurement of High-Quality Development in Qinghai. Qinghai Social Science 2023(03): 40–49.
Wei YH, Wang BS, Zhu L, 2023, Measurement of High-Quality Economic Development based on Spatio-Temporal Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Evaluation Method: A Case Study of Guangdong Province. Statistics and Decision Making, 39(08): 91–95.
Zhang Z, Liu XM, 2019, Construction and Measurement of Evaluation System for High-Quality Economic Development of 15 Sub-provincial Cities in China. New Era Exploration of Economic Issues, 2019(06): 20–31 + 70.
Huang J, Lu HY, Sun ZM, 2024, Sources of Variation and Mechanisms of High-quality Development in China’s Economy. Statistics and Decision Making, 40(03): 118–122.
Gan CH, Zheng RG, Yu DF, 2011, The Impact of Industrial Structure Change on Economic Growth and Volatility in China. Economic Research, 2011(5): 14.