Study of the Constituent Elements of the Pickpocketing Crime
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Pickpocketing
Public places
Carrying property

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v6i4.6696

Submitted : 2024-04-13
Accepted : 2024-04-28
Published : 2024-05-13

Abstract

Pickpocketing is a relatively common type of crime in Chinese judicial practice. The two basic characteristics of pickpocketing are that the crime should take place in a public place and the object of pickpocketing should be the property carried by others. Although the judicial interpretation has established the characteristics of pickpocketing, the debate on it has not subsided, specifically with the dispute on the definition of “public places” and “carrying”. Public places are categorized into completely open public places and relatively open public places. So the nature of public places in specific cases should be analyzed. The scope of the property being carried not just includes the property on the body of an individual, but also includes the property being placed within a safe distance from the individual in the surrounding area.

References

Che H, 2013, Pickpocketing Criminalization: Taboos and Criminal Law for Perpetrators. China Law Journal, 2013(1): 123–124.

Sun WH, Wang LC, 2013, Judicial Prudence after the Criminalization of Pickpocketing. Journal of Law, 11(34): 65¬–75.

Chen ZJ, Zhai JP, 2013, A Study on the Judicial Determination of the Characteristics of Pickpocketing Behavior and Prosecution Standards. Journal of the People's Public Security University of China (Social Sciences), 2013(3): 137¬–144.

Zhang H, 2015, A Rational Critique of Pickpocketing After Criminalization. Chinese Journal of Criminal Law, 2015(2): 65–78.

Zhang MK, 2011, New Issues in Theft. Politics and Law, 2011(8): 2–13.

Yan WY, Jiang WW, 2015, The Determination of Carrying Property in Pickpocketing Theft. China Prosecutor, 2015(3).

Liu XQ, 2013, Analysis of Several Difficult Issues in the New Judicial Interpretation of the Crime of Theft. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 2013(6): 90–101.

Lang S, 2011, Interpretation of Amendment (VIII) to the Criminal Law. Journal of the National Prosecutors College, 2011(2): 158.

Li X, 2011, The Path of Judicial Application of the New Type of Theft Crime. East China University of Political Science and Law Journal, 2011(5): 113–120.

Zhang MK, 1995, On the Modesty of Criminal Law. Zhongnan University of Political Science and Law Journal (Law and Business Studies), 1995(4): 55–62.