Chinese Legislation and Theoretical Basis for Patent Parallel Import: Consideration of Parallel Import of Pharmaceutical Patents During the Pandemic
Download PDF

Keywords

Patent parallel import
Principle of exhaustion of rights
Pharmaceutical patents
Customs

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v6i1.5916

Submitted : 2023-12-30
Accepted : 2024-01-14
Published : 2024-01-29

Abstract

The current Chinese Patent Law permits parallel import, but its theoretical basis is disputed. Neither theprinciple of domestic exhaustion of rights nor the principle of international exhaustion of rights can be used as thetheoretical basis to support parallel import. Chinese legislation can set aside the traditional dispute between the principleof exhaustion of rights and the principle of territoriality, support parallel import in principle, and make exceptions in whichparallel import can be prohibited if the parallel importer violates the contract or authorization agreement or conductsunfair competition to damage the legitimate rights and interests of the patentee or the consumer. The primary objective oflegislation on parallel imports of pharmaceutical patented products should be better protection of public health. Permittingparallel import of patented medicine is of utmost significance to decrease the price of patented drugs and expand theaccessibility of drugs. However, we should also prevent the import of fake and inferior goods. China should be cautiousabout permitting the parallel import of “repackaged” pharmaceutical patented products in legislation and law enforcement.Regarding administrative enforcement, the customs should set up special supervision authorities for patent import andexport, and standardize the enforcement procedure for parallel import.

References

Wang R, Gao J, 2020, IP Strategy for International Public Health Emergencies—Based on the Emergency Caused by COVID-19. China Invention & Patent, 17: 79–86.

Heath C, 2004, Legal Concept of Exhaustion and Parallel Import, in Parallel Imports in Asia, Kluwer Law International, Holland.

Yan GZ, 2009, A Study on the Regulation of Parallel Importation, Peking University Press, Beijing.

Tan QP, 2003, Issues of Intellectual Property in Parallel Import. Modern Law Science 25: 166–174.

Ding JX, Li MQ, Chen Y, et al., 2016, Study on Price Control Effect of Parallel Import of Patent Drugs. Health Economics Research, 10: 8–12.

Gao H, 2007, Legal Research on the Parallel Importation with Trademark in International Trade. Law Science Magazine, 28: 97–100.

Liu YJ, Ma L, 2012, Theoretical Research on the New Development of Parallel Import System of Chinese Patent Products. Social Science front 8: 194–202.

Zhang WJ, n.d., Import Right, Parallel Import, Exhaustion of Right and its Limitation, viewed January 9, 2022, http://blog.sina.com.cn/zhangweijun27

Wang Q, 2009, Intellectual Property Law Tutorial, 2nd ed; China Renmin University Press, Bejing, 359.

Shi TR, 2016, A Comparative Study on the Legal Regulation of Parallel Imports of Patented Products. Business 27: 259 + 251

Bi J, Zhang N, 2005, Review of Chinese Reviews: Selected Articles Recently Published in Chinese (Part 3). Chinese Journal of International Law, 4: 731–737.

TRIPS Agreement, 2017, viewed July 30, 2023, http://ipr.mofcom.gov.cn/zhuanti/law/conventions/wto/trips.html

Doha WTO Ministerial, 2001, Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, viewed July 30, 2023, https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_trips_e.htm

Ncube CB, 2009, Enforcing Patent Rights against Goods in Transit: A New Threat to Transborder Trade in Generic Medicines. South African Mercantile Law Journal 21: 680–694.

He J, 2011, Developing Countries’ Pursuit of an Intellectual Property Law Balance under the WTO TRIPS Agreement. Chinese Journal of International Law, 10: 827–863.

Chinese Patent Law, 2020, China National Intellectual Property Administration, viewed July 30, 2023, https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2020/11/23/art_97_155167.html

Yin FL, 2011, The Reference Significance of the USA Rules on Parallel Import of Patented Products to China. Law Science Magazine 32: 71–74.

Dratler J, 2003, Licensing of Intellectual Property, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing.

Chinese Anti-Unfair Competition Law, 2019, The National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China, viewed July 30, 2023, http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/201905/9a37c6ff150c4be6a549d526fd586122.shtml

Patent Protection and Access To HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals in Sub-Saharan Africa, viewed July 30, 2023, https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/about-ip/en/studies/pdf/iipi_hiv.pdf

Grigiene J, Cerka P, 2019, Can a Parallel Importer Rebrand Pharmaceutical Products in the Eu?. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 9: 57–76.

Lerner J, 2010, The Patent System in a Time of Turmoil. The WIPO Journal, 2: 28–37.

Forward Looking Industry Research Institute, Analysis of the Current Situation of Import and Export in China’s Pharmaceutical Industry, viewed December 30, 2023, https://baijiahao.baidu.com/sid=1698450803655824566&wfr=spider&for=pc

Feng JH, 2003, Global Public Health Crisis, International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and WTO Doha Declaration. Law Review, 2: 10–18.