With the deepening of population aging and the rapid proliferation of electronic payment technologies, older adults have gradually become an important participant group in the digital payment system. While electronic payments have improved transaction efficiency and facilitated daily life, older adults face multiple security risks in the process of use due to their relatively limited digital capabilities, weak risk-identification abilities, complex platform operating rules, and unequal access to digital support from family members. These risks include fraud inducement, unintended charges caused by operational errors, personal information leakage, account theft, and even being coerced by criminals into becoming involved in illegal and criminal activities. Consequently, the security of electronic payments for older adults is no longer limited to technical risk prevention and control; rather, it has evolved into a comprehensive governance issue requiring the joint participation of multiple actors, including public security authorities, banks, payment platforms, families, communities, and society at large. To address these challenges, this study proposes that public security authorities should play a central coordinating and driving role in further promoting the development of cross-departmental data-sharing and coordinated response mechanisms. It is also necessary to improve the institutional design and age-friendly service standards for the security of electronic payments used by older adults, while strengthening the risk-identification, human-intervention, and emergency payment-suspension capabilities of banks and payment platforms. These measures can effectively enhance the systemic, coordinated, and practical effectiveness of electronic payment security governance for older adults, thereby better safeguarding their property security, information security, and legitimate rights and interests in the digital society.
Sahi AM, Khalid H, Abbas AF, et al., 2022, The Research Trend of Security and Privacy in Digital Payment. Informatics, 9(2): 32.
Almaiah MA, Al-Rahmi A, Alturise F, et al., 2022, Investigating the Effect of Perceived Security, Perceived Trust, and Information Quality on Mobile Payment Usage through Near-Field Communication (NFC) in Saudi Arabia. Electronics, 11(23): 3926.
Patra GK, Rajaram SK, Boddapati VN, et al., 2022, Advancing Digital Payment Systems: Combining AI, Big Data, and Biometric Authentication for Enhanced Security. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 11(8): 10.18535.
Chand K, Tiwari R, Gupta A, et al., 2025, How Does Perceived Security Influence Mobile Wallet Users’ Behavior? A SEM Investigation. Managerial Finance, 51(1): 146–165.
Luo RH, Wang N, Zhu X, 2025, Fraud Detection and Risk Assessment of Online Payment Transactions on E-Commerce Platforms Based on LLM and GCN Frameworks. arXiv preprint, arXiv: 2509.09928.
Dhar BK, Omar MA, Yusuf AH, et al., 2026, Ethical Imperatives in Digital Finance: Advancing E-Payment Inclusion in a Fragile Economy. Business and Society Review, 131(1): e70031.
Nurlaila F, Kusmiati E, Shiddieq DF, 2026, Consumer Preferences in Choosing Payment Methods on the TikTok Shop and Shopee Platforms. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 6(1): 886–897.
Galilea M, Farazi S, Mare DS, 2026, Firm Credit Constraints and Electronic Payments: A Global Analysis. SSRN: 6065193.