Employees’ taking charge behavior refers to discretionary and constructive behaviors through which employees voluntarily initiate, promote, and implement changes that contribute to organizational improvement and development. It serves as a crucial source of organizational adaptability and sustainable innovation in increasingly complex business environments. In recent years, with the rapid advancement of digital transformation, green development, and agile organizational management, taking charge behavior has become a prominent topic in the field of organizational behavior. This study systematically reviews the existing literature on the influencing factors of employees’ taking charge behavior, focusing on four major dimensions: leadership factors, organizational environmental factors, individual psychological factors, and underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, current research limitations are summarized, and future research directions are proposed to provide theoretical references for subsequent studies and practical implications for organizational management.
Dong X, Zhang Y, Wu H, et al., 2026, Increasing Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors through Digital Leadership: Examining the Roles of Job Crafting and Proactive Personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 2026(17): 1767532.
Den Hartog DN, Belschak FD, 2012, When does Transformational Leadership Enhance Employee Proactive Behavior? The Role of Autonomy and Role Breadth Self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1): 194–202.
Zhou X, Xiong Q, Wang M, et al., 2025, Employees’ Perception of Digital Human Resource Management Changes and Proactive Behavior: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement and Moderating Effect of Person-Organization Fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025(16): 1623702.
Li YF, Chen CL, Chi SL, et al., 2021, The Role of Team–member Exchange in Proactive Personality and Employees’ Proactive Behaviors: The Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(4): 429–443.
Du Y, Yang M, 2022, Green Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Taking Charge Behavior: The Mediating Role of Personal Initiative and the Moderating Role of Green Organizational Identity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7): 4172.
Zheng Z, Liu W, He W, 2024, How and when Differentiated Transformational Leadership Influences Employees’ Taking Charge? The Roles of Psychological Availability and Collectivism Orientation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(1): 1–20.
Mehra P, 2024, Exploring the Role of Individual-focused Transformational Leadership in Facilitating Taking Charge: Mediating Mechanism of Psychological Capital and Thriving at Work. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(2): 435–455.
Li H, Zhang Y, 2023, How does Secure-base Leadership Affect Employees’ Taking-charge Behavior: The Role of Psychological Availability and Independent Self-construal. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10): 853.
Chen G, Wang J, Du Z, et al., 2023, How does Authentic Leadership Promote Taking Charge: The Mediating Effect of Team Social Capital and the Moderating Effect of Absorptive Capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023(13): 1046914.
Kong L, Liu Y, Ding H, et al., 2024, The Impact of Empowering Leadership on Taking Charge Behaviors: Mediating Strengths Use and Moderating Ambition. Behavioral Sciences, 14(8): 633.
Shan J, Fan X, Yang Y, 2024, Impact of Family Supportive Leadership on Taking Charge Behaviour: Resource-gain-development Framework Perspective. Chinese Management Studies, 18(3): 785–801.
Ma L, Liu L, Song X, 2025, A Study on the Mechanism of Relative Leader-member Exchange on Employees’ Taking Charge Behavior: From Self-perception Perspective. BMC Psychology, 13(1): 1369.
Li S, Sun F, Li M, 2019, Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-oriented Employees: Relationship between High-commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors. Sustainability, 11(13): 3550.
Du J, 2026, Appreciation for Being Recognized: The Influence of Strengths-Based Psychological Climates on Employee Proactive Change Behavior. Current Psychology, 45(2): 126.
Fang S, Zhang A, Liu J, 2022, Job Insecurity and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2): 696.
Luo JY, Li PY, Du J, 2020, Coping with Supervisor Sanctions during Organizational Change: Core Members’ Active Change Behavior and Followers’ Middle Way Thinking. Sustainability, 12(15): 6277.
Xia XZ, Li C, Wang LX, et al., 2021, How does Information Sharing of a Supervisor Influence Proactive Change Behavior of an Employee? The Chain Mediating Role of Family-Like Employee–Organization Relationship and Relationship Energy. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021(12): 739968.
Li Z, Xu J, Liu R, et al., 2020, Environmentally Specific Transformational Leadership and Employee’s Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Environmental Passion and Autonomous Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020(11): 1408.