One of the main problems facing the improvement of environmental quality at present is that the two are not addressed together. A unified evaluation system for the co-benefits of reducing carbon emissions and improving the atmosphere is proposed in this study through environmental engineering. Using multiple dimensions and linked quantitative models, the system will combine the help provided by end-of-pipe control technology, structural decarbonization plans, and nature-based engineering solutions. A Synergy Index and an integrated environmental benefit formula are employed to quantify the two objectives in a single analysis system. Based on the above scenarios, the combination of engineering measures for carbon capture and storage (CCS), renewable energy substitution, and sectoral electrification is expected to reduce PM₂.₅ concentrations by as much as 34.6 μg/m³ and prevent about 290–410 premature deaths per million people per year. The above results indicate that the unified framework does outperform the individual-objective optimization of single-measure reductions and provides reference points for policymakers and engineers in their pursuit of carbon neutrality and clean air.
Gong J, Yin Z, Lei Y, et al., 2025, The 2023 Report of the Synergetic Roadmap on Carbon Neutrality and Clean Air for China: Carbon Reduction, Pollution Mitigation, Greening, and Growth. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2025(23): 100517.
Lei Y, Yin Z, Lu X, et al. The 2022 Report of Synergetic Roadmap on Carbon Neutrality and Clean Air for China: Accelerating Transition in Key Sectors. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2024(19): 100335.
Zhao M, Xie Y, Xu M, et al., 2024, Optimizing Air Quality and Health Co-benefits of Mitigation Technologies in China: An Integrated Assessment. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2024(22): 100454.
Zhang L, Wei L, Ren J, et al., 2024, City-level Synergy and Co-benefits of Mitigating CO2 Emissions and Air Pollution in China. Heliyon, 2024(10): 15.
Wang J, Lu X, Du P, et al., 2023, The Increasing Role of Synergistic Effects in Carbon Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement, and its Associated Health Benefits in China. Engineering, 2023(20): 103–111.
Qin Y, Zhou M, Hao Y, et al. Amplified Positive Effects on Air Quality, Health, and Renewable Energy under China’s Carbon Neutral Target. Nature Geoscience, 17(5): 411–418.
Moutet L, Bernard P, Green R, et al., 2025, The Public Health Co-benefits of Strategies Consistent with Net-zero Emissions: A Systematic Review. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(2): e145–e156.
Feng T, Sun Y, Shi Y, et al., 2024, Air Pollution Control Policies and Impacts: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024(191): 114071.
Qi Z, Zheng Y, Cao W, et al., 2025, Weakening Synergies in Carbon and Air Pollution Co-Control Necessitate Robust Structural Transitions in China’s Transportation Sector. National Science Review, 12(11): nwaf422.
Jordan AB, Rodriguez DS, Bennett JA, et al., 2024, Quantifying Air Quality Co-benefits to Industrial Decarbonization: The Local Air Emissions Tracking Atlas. Frontiers in Public Health, 2024(12): 1394678.
Feng Y, Liu W, Zhang H, et al., 2024, Synergistic Assessment of Environmental Pollutants and Carbon Emissions in the Yellow River Basin, China: An Integrated Study Based on Scenario Simulation and Process Decomposition. Ecological Indicators, 2024(166): 112334.
Liu Z, Zhou M, Li D, et al., 2025, Co-benefit of Forestation on Ozone Air Quality and Carbon Storage in South China. Nature Communications, 16(1): 2429.
Jordan KH, Dennin LR, Adams PJ, et al., 2024, Climate Policy Reduces Racial Disparities in Air Pollution from Transportation and Power Generation. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(49): 21510–21522.
Beevers S, Assareh N, Beddows A, et al., 2025, Climate Change Policies Reduce Air Pollution and Increase Physical Activity: Benefits, Costs, Inequalities, and Indoor Exposures. Environment International, 2025(195): 109164.
Meier P, Holloway T, Wu X, et al., 2025, Emissions Reductions to Meet a Tighter Ozone Standard in the US through Control Technologies versus Clean Energy Transition Scenarios. Environmental Science & Technology, 59(50): 26999–27012.