The Internal Mechanism and Implementation Path of the Culture-Tourism Industry in Promoting Urban Renewal: A Coupled Perspective of Embeddedness Theory and Public Value Creation
Download PDF

Keywords

Culture-tourism integration
Urban renewal
Embeddedness
Public value
Industrial heritage
Beijing 798 Art District

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v8i6.15463

Submitted : 2026-06-15
Accepted : 2026-06-30
Published : 2026-07-15

Abstract

At a historical moment when China’s urbanization rate has exceeded 65%, the logic of urban development is shifting from incremental expansion to the quality improvement of existing space. Urban renewal, as a key carrier of this transition, faces multiple governance dilemmas, including spatial dysfunction, industrial hollowing-out, and cultural rupture. With strong integrative capacity, permeability, and spillover effects, the culture-tourism industry has become a crucial variable for addressing these problems. However, existing studies have often focused on either economic evaluation or physical spatial transformation, leaving the black box of how culture and tourism become deeply involved in the renewal of urban systems insufficiently explained. From the dual perspectives of embeddedness theory and public value theory, this paper develops a coupled framework linking institutional, economic, and cultural embeddedness with the creation of economic, social, and cultural public value. Taking Beijing 798 Art District as a typical case of industrial heritage renewal, the study finds that the culture-tourism industry is not merely an additive element in urban renewal. Rather, it gains institutional support through institutional embeddedness, activates endogenous growth through capital and industrial-chain embeddedness, and reshapes spatial meaning through symbolic and memory embeddedness. These processes jointly promote spatial reproduction, collaborative governance, and cultural resilience. Accordingly, the paper proposes implementation paths involving top-level design, industrial ecosystem reconstruction, spatial narrative activation, and multi-actor co-governance, aiming to provide theoretical reference and practical inspiration for organic urban renewal in China.

References

Zhang JX, Chen H, 2023, Rethinking China’s Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Spatial Governance. City Planning Review, 47(1): 18–24.

Chang JS, Zhang TB, 2025, Development Models, Challenges, and Strategies of Urban Renewal. Shanghai Real Estate, 2025(4): 14–17.

Shi QY, 2025, Research Status of Integrated Development of China’s Culture and Tourism Industry. Cooperative Economy & Science, 2025(3): 14–17.

Cai ZB, 2025, A Study on the Coordination Degree and Spatial Correlation of Culture-Tourism Industry Integration in China. Shanghai Energy Conservation, 2025(3): 317–327.

Song B, Cai ZX, 2025, Mechanism Analysis of Culture-Tourism Integration Empowering Urban Renewal: Landscape as Method. Studies in Culture & Art, published online.

Granovetter M, 1985, Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510.

Moore MH, 1995, Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Ma XG, Li RT, 2025, Deconstructing the Factory: Trialectics of Space in Industrial Heritage Renewal—An Empirical Study of Beijing 798 Art District. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 41(6): 41–50.

Bao JG, Liang ZX, 2024, Driving Mechanisms and Path Selection of Tourism Industry Integration in China. Tourism Tribune, 39(2): 3–5.