Accessibility and Spatial Differentiation of Elderly Care Service Facilities in Dalian
Download PDF

Keywords

Elderly care service facilities
Accessibility
Spatial differentiation
Dalian

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v8i6.15417

Submitted : 2026-06-15
Accepted : 2026-06-30
Published : 2026-07-15

Abstract

Population aging is changing the way elderly care services are planned. This paper takes the districts and county-level areas of Dalian as the study units. It distinguishes two common service scenarios: nearby daily life support and medium-distance institutional care with integrated medical–elderly care services. The study combines transport accessibility, the spatial dispersion of the older population, and service supply intensity. Based on these indicators, it builds a supply intensity–accessibility risk framework to identify service deficits and governance priorities. The results show a clear spatial differentiation in elderly care service accessibility in Dalian. The main urban area has a lower accessibility risk, while outer districts and county-level areas face a higher risk. Shahekou District, Zhongshan District, and Xigang District show relatively strong supply and low risk in both service scenarios. Their elderly care resources are more likely to be converted into an effective supply. Pulandian District, Wafangdian City, and Zhuanghe City face both insufficient supply and limited accessibility. These areas should be the key targets for systematic improvement. Different areas also show different dominant constraints. Jinzhou District and Lüshunkou District are mainly constrained by gaps in institutional care and integrated medical–elderly care services. Changhai County is affected by its island spatial structure, so it needs stronger daily life support and transfer services. Ganjingzi District has a more specific shortage in nearby daily life support services. Elderly care governance, therefore, needs to match service type, spatial accessibility, and supply–demand mismatch. This approach can support more precise area-based allocation of elderly care resources.

References

O’Brien E, 2016, Planning for Population Aging: Implications of Local Demographic, Spatial and Fiscal Differences. International Planning Studies, 21(4): 317–328.

Yu Y, 2025, Towards a Critical Geography of Aging: Political Economy, Biopolitics, and Care. Progress in Human Geography, 2025, 49(2): 164–181.

Khan HTA, Addo KM, Findlay H, 2024, Public Health Challenges and Responses to the Growing Aging Populations. Public Health Challenges, 3(3): e213.

Gabriel Z, Bowling ANN, 2004, Quality of Life from the Perspectives of Older People. Aging & Society, 24(5): 675–691.

Van Leeuwen KM, Van Loon MS, Van Nes FA, et al., 2019, What does Quality of Life Mean to Older Adults? A Thematic Synthesis. PloS One, 14(3): e0213263.

Beard JR, Officer A, De Carvalho IA, et al., 2016, The World Report on Aging and Health: A Policy Framework for Healthy Aging. The Lancet, 387(10033): 2145–2154.

Buffel T, Phillipson C, 2016, Can Global Cities be “Age-friendly cities”? Urban Development and Aging Populations. Cities, 2016(55): 94–100.

Hussein S, Ismail M, 2017, Aging and Elderly Care in the Arab Region: Policy Challenges and Opportunities. Aging International, 42(3): 274–289.

Zhang K, Miao T, Wang T, et al., 2026, Spatial Distribution and the Imbalance between Supply and Demand: An Analysis of the Geographical Characteristics and Regional Differences of Elderly Care Institutions in China. International Journal of Health Geographics, 25(1): 8.

Cheng L, Yang M, De Vos J, et al., 2020, Examining Geographical Accessibility to Multi-tier Hospital Care Services for the Elderly: A Focus on Spatial Equity. Journal of Transport & Health, 2020(19): 100926.

Liu R, Du M, Shen J, et al., 2021, Research on Geriatric Care for Equalizing the Topological Layout of Health Care Infrastructure Networks. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021(1): 8306479.

Mattson J, 2011, Transportation, Distance, and Health Care Utilization for Older Adults in Rural and Small Urban Areas. Transportation Research Record, 2265(1): 192–199.

Asadzadeh M, Maher A, Jafari M, et al., 2022, A Review Study of the Providing Elderly Care Services in Different Countries. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(2): 458–465.

Guagliardo MF, 2004, Spatial Accessibility of Primary Care: Concepts, Methods and Challenges. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3(1): 3.

Tuncel G, Alpan G, 2010, Risk Assessment and Management for Supply Chain Networks: A Case Study. Computers in Industry, 61(3): 250–259.

Feng Z, Glinskaya E, Chen H, et al., 2020, Long-term Care System for Older Adults in China: Policy Landscape, Challenges, and Future Prospects. The Lancet, 396(10259): 1362–1372.

Hu H, Shao H, Li Y, et al. GIS-Based Analysis of Elderly Care Facility Distribution and Supply–Demand Coordination in the Yangtze River Delta. Land, 14(4): 723.

Bruneel J, Moray N, Stevens R, et al., 2016, Balancing Competing Logics in For-profit Social Enterprises: A Need for Hybrid Governance. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(3): 263–288.