Research on the Construction Logic of Community Governance Collectives under the “Structure-Action” Framework—A Practical Exploration Based on YC District, SX City
Download PDF

Keywords

Community governance collectives
“Contract-based” co-construction
Structure
Action
Generative logic

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v8i6.15390

Submitted : 2026-06-15
Accepted : 2026-06-30
Published : 2026-07-15

Abstract

The construction of a community governance collective is an important practical pathway for advancing the modernization of grassroots governance and governance capabilities. However, existing research often analyzes this from the single dimension of either structure or action. While this has enriched our understanding of the pathways for constructing community governance collectives, it still lacks a systematic explanation of how structure and action complement each other in specific governance contexts. Based on this, this paper introduces Giddens’s theory of structuration and, using the “contract-based” co-construction practice in YC District, SX City, Zhejiang Province, as a case study, constructs a “structure-action” analytical framework to explore the internal logic of the formation of community governance collectives. The study finds that the construction of the community governance collectives in YC District is not the result of a single structural element or mere actor action, but rather the product of the coupled interaction between structure and action. Structural elements provide institutional boundaries, value orientations, and practical conditions for governance actions, while actors adapt and reshape existing structures in response to real-world governance issues. This process propels community governance relationships from interest-based connections toward emotional identification, achieving a transition from decentralized governance to collective-based governance. The relatively mature “contract-based” co-construction practice path thus formed provides valuable practical experience for effective grassroots community governance during the 15th Five-Year Plan period.

References

CPC Central Committee, 2019, Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Several Major Issues Concerning Upholding and Improving the System of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and Advancing the Modernization of the National Governance System and Governance Capacity. People’s Daily, November 6, 2019, 1.

CPC Central Committee, 2025, Proposal of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Formulating the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development. People’s Daily, October 29, 2025, 1.

Liu S, 2024, Reshaping the Public Spirit of Community Governance Collectives in the Context of Chinese-style Modernization. Journal of Yunnan University (Social Sciences Edition), 23(2): 69–78.

Liu YQ, 2025, Community Governance Collectives: An Iconic Concept for Constructing an Autonomous Knowledge System. New Horizons, 2025(1): 119–128.

Jin Q, 2025, “Community Governance Collectives”: Theoretical Implications and Chinese Characteristics. Social Sciences, 2025(3): 156–164.

Zhang M, 2023, Structural Reconstruction, Order Integration, and Value Co-creation: Pathways for Building a Social Governance Community. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences Edition), 51(2): 80–88.

Ma WW, Gong YR, 2023, Ethical Forms of Western Social Governance and their Critique: With a Discussion on China’s Social Governance toward Good Governance. Leadership Science, 2023(1): 88–92.

Li ZM, 2023, A Study on the Construction of Social Governance Communities from the Perspective of “State-Society” Relations. People’s Forum: Academic Frontiers, 2023(10): 95–102.

Zhang Z, Zhong CP, Wu JY, 2025, The Practical Logic and Operational Mechanisms of Youth Participation in the Construction of Urban Community Governance Collectives: A Multi-case Analysis Based on the “Community Youth Action”. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 45(5): 172–182.

Bao GX, Liu Y, 2025, Embedding and Integration: How Social Workers Promote the Construction of Community Governance Collectives—Based on Practices in Xihu District, Hangzhou. Governance Studies, 41(2): 97–109 + 159–160.

Giddens A, 2016, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Translated by Li Kang and Li Meng. Renmin University of China Press, Beijing, 5 + 15–16 + 23.

You ZW, Wu YH, 2025, Action Strategies and Practical Logic of University Environmental Volunteer Associations from a “Structure-action” Perspective: A Case Study of the S Environmental Volunteer Association at H University. Environmental Sociology, 2025(1): 200–225 + 263 –264.

Wu XX, Chen Q, 2025, The Generative Logic of Grassroots Social Governance Communities under the “Structure-action” Framework: An Analysis of Practices in Y Community, M City, Sichuan. Social Scientists, 2025(6): 116–124.

Xu Y, 2017, “Cultural Governance” in China from the Perspective of Two Types of Dependency: Phased Characteristics of Rural Governance through “Cultivating People through Culture”. Learning and Exploration, 2017(11): 59–63 + 192.

Qiu MH, 2015, Interests, Identity, and Institutions: A Study on the Development of Urban Grassroots Social Organizations. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Sciences Edition), 32(3): 97–106.

Chen ZZ, 2010, The Modernist Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the “Sense of Community” in Urban Neighborhoods. Journal of Theoretical Studies, 2010(3): 25–27.

Gu XK, Li XT, Liu J, 2023, A Study on Rural Spatial Governance in Large Cities Based on the IAD Theoretical Framework: The Case of Langxia Town, Jinshan District, Shanghai. Human Geography, 38(3): 100–107.