A large number of bone spades, wooden spades, wooden shovels, and a small number of stone spades related to rice-cultivation tillage have been unearthed from sites of the Hemudu Culture. Existing studies have mainly focused on the forms, hafting methods, and functions of individual bone spades, while less attention has been paid to how different tools participated in continuous tillage processes and formed assemblage relationships. This paper examines Hemudu tillage tools under low-lying, waterside, and shallow muddy surface conditions, focusing on their material properties, working-end forms, hafting structures, and possible operational functions. The study argues that these tools were not scattered artifacts, but formed a basic tool assemblage through land opening, soil turning and lifting, and preliminary field-surface treatment. This assemblage was characterized by the dominance of bone spades, the supplementary role of wooden tools, and the transitional appearance of stone spades, showing preliminary division of labor and limited coordination. This perspective helps shift the study of Hemudu agricultural tools from artifact classification toward tool relationships within tillage processes.
Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, 2003, Hemudu: Archaeological Excavation Report of a Neolithic Site, Cultural Relics Press, Beijing.
Hemudu Site Archaeological Team, 1978, The First Excavation Report of the Hemudu Site. Acta Archaeologica Sinica, 1978(1): 39–94 + 140–155.
Hemudu Site Archaeological Team, 1980, Major Achievements of the Second Excavation at the Hemudu Site, Zhejiang. Cultural Relics, 1980(5): 1–15 + 98–99.
Wang NS, 1991, Bone Spades of the Hemudu Culture and Related Issues. Southeast Culture, 1991(1): 240–242.
Huang WJ, 1999, A New Study on Bone Spades of the Hemudu Culture. Archaeology and Cultural Relics, 1999(6): 34–37.
Xie L, Lu X, Sun G, et al., 2017, Functionality and Morphology: Identifying Si Agricultural Tools from among Hemudu Scapular Implements in Eastern China. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(2): 377–423.
Xie L, 2018, Scapulae for Shovels: Does Raw Material Choice Reflect Technological Ease and Low Cost in Production? Journal of Archaeological Science, 2018(97): 77–89.
Wei N, 2002, Environment and the Hemudu Culture. Archaeology and Cultural Relics, 2002(3): 57–60.
Xiao FJ, Ren RB, 2014, Review, Prospects and Reflections on the Study of Rice Remains at the Hemudu Site. Agricultural Archaeology, 2014(6): 10–14.
Huang XR, Zheng HB, Hu ZJ, et al., 2019, Hydrological Environmental Changes Recorded in the Profile of the Tianluoshan Site, Zhejiang. Chinese Science Bulletin, 64(9): 963–976.
Guo LX, Guo JY, 2016, Types of Early Paddy-Field Remains and Their Social Relevance. Chinese Agricultural History, 35(6): 13–28.
Wang YL, Song S, Zhang YX, et al., 2023, Excavation Report on Ancient Paddy-Field Remains at the Shi’ao Site, Yuyao, Zhejiang. Archaeology, 2023(5): 2 + 3–21.
Fuller DQ, Harvey E, Qin L, 2007, Presumed Domestication? Evidence for Wild Rice Cultivation and Domestication in the Fifth Millennium BC of the Lower Yangtze Region. Antiquity, 81(312): 316–331.