This paper studies narrative frameworks, ideological stances, and the fragmentation of public opinion in Chinese and American media of the 2023 Israel-Palestine conflict. The study finds that both official media in China and the US embrace different narrative structures and ideological positions on the Israel-Palestine issue. This reflects their contestations on public opinion internationally. Examining similarities and differences in the media coverage helps to reveal the causes and consequences of international public opinion fragmentation and gives a new way of looking at how international news is spread.
Bennett WL, 1990, Toward a Theory of Press–State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2): 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
Entman RM, 1993, Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Entman RM, 2004, Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Herman E, Chomsky N, 1988, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books, New York.
Semetko HA, Valkenburg PM, 2000, Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50(2): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x0
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 2023, Occupied Palestinian Territory: Casualties and Humanitarian Impact. United Nations.
Whitten-Woodring J, 2012, Watchdog or Lapdog? Media Freedom, Regime Type, and Government Respect for Human Rights. International Studies Quarterly, 56(3): 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00730.x
Wolfsfeld G, 1997, Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.