From Judicial Intervention to Employment Independence: Supporting Migrant Children with Disabilities Involved in Offences
Abstract
This study examines how to safeguard the employment rights of migrant children with disabilities who have been involved in offenses within a multi-party collaboration mechanism. Firstly, employment support requires the joint participation of multiple stakeholders; secondly, the principle of “the best interests of the child” must be upheld; furthermore, the current lack of accommodative services within judicial social work hampers the improvement of service quality. Specific interventions should be grounded in professional assessments and thorough consultation with service recipients, and should establish clear objectives and strategies while evaluating implementation outcomes. The study further highlights the need to reflect on the tension between professional ideals and localized practice within judicial social services, as well as the systemic barriers faced by multi-professional collaboration.
References
Di XH, 2016, Insights from the Evolution of Juvenile Justice Worldwide Over the Past Century. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2016(3): 55–61 + 147.
Lei XZ, 2016, Obstacles and Solutions in Safeguarding the Litigation Rights of Left-Behind Children Involved in Crimes. Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Research, 2016(3): 70–78.
An Q, 2020, Protection, Punishment, and Prevention: Seventy Years of Institutional Change in China’s Juvenile Justice System (1949–2019). China Youth Study, 2020(2): 35–41 + 49.
Yao JL, 2007, The Integration of Juvenile Justice and Social Work: Centered on the “Non-Trial Affairs” of Juvenile Court Judges. Law Science Magazine, 2007(6): 64–66.
Yang L, 2025, Enhancing Services Through Technology: Exploring Pathways for Effective Intervention in Juvenile Justice Social Work. Journal of Yunnan University (Social Sciences Edition), 2025(2): 79–91.
Xi XH, 2018, The Practice and Reflection on Social Work in China’s Juvenile Justice. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 33(6): 18–27.
He T, Zhang LX, 2020, Reflections on the Social Support System for Juvenile Justice: From the Perspective of the Risk Control Theory Paradigm. China Review of Applied Jurisprudence, 2020(2): 86–103.
Zhang Y, 2006, Viewing Community Correction for Juveniles from the Perspective of Cognitive Dissonance. Journal of Jiangxi Public Security Academy, 2006(2): 96–101.
Teng X, 2023, Reliability Analysis of Judicial Social Work Intervention for Juveniles Involved in Crimes: Taking the Risk Assessment in the Social Investigation System as an Example. Legality Vision, 2023(20): 136–138.
Xiong GB, 2020, Three Management Models of Community Corrections and Analysis of Social Work Intervention Effectiveness: Based on the Perspective of Evidence-Based Corrections. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2020(2): 114–125.
Zhang K, 2025, Research on the Dilemmas and Countermeasures for Migrant Workers’ Integration into Cities, thesis, Shandong Provincial Party Committee School of the CPC.
Zhou Y, Huang YF, 2025, Analysis of Community Correction Practices and Optimization Paths in Shenzhen from the Perspective of Social Integration Theory. Community Corrections: Theory and Practice, 4(2): 47–54.
Wang Y, Jiang L, Wang Q, 2024, Exploring Social Work Intervention Paths for the Social Integration of Migrant Children: An Empirical Study Based on Agency T in Changchun. Employment and Social Security, 2024(9): 16–18.
Yue ZS, Du HF, Li SZ, et al., 2009, Concepts, Theories, and Applications of Contemporary Western Social Integration Research. Journal of Public Management, 2009(2): 114–121 + 128.
Social Exclusion Unit, 1998, Prime Minister’s Speech on the Establishment of the Social Exclusion Unit.
European Commission, 2004, Joint Report on Social Inclusion 2004. Brussels.
Chan K, Evans S, Ng Y, et al., 2014, A Concept Mapping Study on Social Inclusion in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 2014(119): 121–137.
