A Pragmatic Analysis of Corporate Public Relations Apology Strategies on Weibo
Abstract
This study explores the pragmatic strategies of corporate public relations (PR) apologies on Weibo and their effectiveness, adopting an integrated framework of Speech Act Theory and the Politeness Principle. Through qualitative analysis of 20 official apology statements (2024–2025) and in-depth study of 4 representative cases, two core findings are derived: First, corporations employ five integrated pragmatic strategy patterns, which form a progressive system from emotional repair to identity reshaping. Second, strategy effectiveness relies on adaptation to Weibo’s features such as short-text constraints, real-time interactivity, and information fragmentation. This study supplements Western-centric pragmatic theories with Chinese new media context insights and provides guidance for corporations to design context-appropriate Weibo apology strategies, enhancing crisis management and trust restoration.
References
Austin JL, 1962, How to do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Searle JR, 1969, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Leech GN, 1983, Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, London.
Zhang YM, 2013, An Analysis of the Speech Act in Public Relation Language. Journal of Jixi University, 13(10): 118–120.
Li XC, 2011, Politeness Principle in the Application of the Language of Public Relations. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 10(2): 201–205.
Wang HC, 2005, The Mutual Complementarity of Cooperative Principle and Politeness Principle in Public Relations Pragmatic Effects. Journal of Adult Education of Hebei University, 7(1): 55–57.
Zhu YN, 2025, Innovation and Practical Research on Corporate Public Relations Strategies in the New Media Environment. Public Relations World, 2025(8): 15–17.
Jiang JY, Hu R, 2005, Pragmatic Studies on Apologies and the Improvement of “Meier’s Repair Work”. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 35(5): 170–176.
Page R, 2014, Saying “Sorry”: Corporate Apologies Posted on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62(2): 30-45.
Fu B, 2010, A Discourse Study on the Language of Apologies in Chinese. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 2010(6): 70–77.
Huang H, Yi PL, 2023, Research on the Trust Repair Discourse Strategy in Corporate Crisis Public Relations Statement on New Media. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 44(6): 10–20.