Local Governments Explore the Path System of High Quality Development of Social Organizations—A Grounded Theory Analysis Based on Local Government Policy Documents
Abstract
In today’s context, the high-quality development of social organizations plays a crucial role in social governance and public service provision. This paper focuses on the policy texts of local governments in fostering the development of social organizations, and employs the grounded theory approach to analyze the pathways of local governments in exploring the high-quality development of social organizations by coding and analyzing 36 local policy documents with the NVivo12 software. The study constructed a five-dimensional progressive model of “Foundation—Capacity—Power—Collaborate—Value”, which starts from the Institutional Safeguard System, Organizational Development Foundation Capacity Building, Performance-Driven Incentives, Strategic Synergy Value Network, and Socialized Governance Participatory Mechanisms. Based on these elements, the study comprehensively explains the internal logic and policy path of the high-quality development of social organizations. This study aims to provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for promoting social organizations to better participate in social governance and achieve sustainable development, and at the same time, reveals the limitations in the research process and illuminates the direction for further research.
References
Wan Q, Du W, 2022, Social Capital, Environmental Knowledge, and Pro-Environmental Behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3): 1443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031443
Xian M, Zhao C, Zhou Y, 2022, From Bureaucratic Coordination to a Data-Driven Model: Transformation and Capacity Building of Community-Based Prevention and Control of Public Health Events. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14): 8238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148238
Islam MR, 2017, Non-governmental Organizations and Community Development in Bangladesh. International Social Work, 60(2): 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815574133
Becerikli K, Koroglu BA, 2017, The Role of NGO’s in Improving Local Capacity and Local Development; The Case of Antakya. Planlama-Planning, 27(2): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2017.28290
Vander Zaag R, 2013, Canadian Faith-based Development NGOs and CIDA Funding. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 34(2): 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2013.792726
Otsuki K, 2010, Sustainable Development Interfaces: A Case of NGO Intervention in a Frontier Settlement in Para. Novos Cadernos Naea, 13(1): 135–154.
Aldashev G, Navarra C, 2018, Development NGOs: Basic facts. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 89(1): 125–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12188
Kelly LM, 2022, Worthwhile or Wasteful? Assessing the Need for a Radical Revision of Evaluation in Small-sized Development NGOs. Development in Practice, 32(2): 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2021.1937540
Hakkarainen M, 2020, Towards Private Sector Collaboration in Aid Practice: Internal Challenges Faced by Development NGOs. Development in Practice, 30(5): 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1758037
Hudson A, 2002, Advocacy by UK-based Development NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3): 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002313005
Miraftab F, 1997, Flirting with the Enemy—Challenges Faced by NGOs in Development and Empowerment. Habitat International, 21(4): 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(97)00011-8
Bebbington A, 1997, New States, new NGOs? Crises and Transitions among Rural Development NGOs in the Andean Region. World Development, 25(11): 1755–1765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00066-1
Huang C, Yang C, Su J, 2021, Identifying Core Policy Instruments Based on Structural Holes: A Case Study of China’s Nuclear Energy Policy. Journal of Informetrics, 15(2): 101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101145
Sallay V, Klinovszky A, Csuka SI, et al., 2021, Striving for Autonomy in Everyday Diabetes Self-management-qualitative Exploration via Grounded Theory Approach. BMJ Open, 11(12): e058885. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058885
Tong H, Qiu F, Fan L, 2022, Characterising Common Challenges Faced by Parental Caregivers of Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Mainland China: A Qualitative Study. BMJ Open, 12(1): e048763. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048763
Nwauche S, Flanigan ST, 2022, Challenges to Nonprofit Organization Participation in Social and Development Policy Planning in South Africa. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 13(2): 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2021-0049
Alzawad Z, Lewis FM, Walker A, 2022, Parents’ Challenges beyond the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Fraying at the Seams while Balancing between Two Worlds, Home and Hospital. Children (Basel, Switzerland): 9(2): 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020267
Tayebwa E, Gatimu SM, Kalisa R, et al., 2023, Provider and Client Perspectives on the Use of Maternity Waiting Homes in Rural Rwanda. Global Health Action, 16(1): 2210881. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2210881
Li J, Wen K, Zhang B, et al., 2023, Influence Analysis and Promotion Countermeasures of Green Finance Policy in China—Traceability Based on Grounded Theory and Validation Using the csQCA Method. PloS One, 18(5): e0285862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285862
Sinha P, 2017, AI-Powered Chatbots for Customer Service: Enhancing Customer Experience and Reducing Costs. JETIR, 4(12): 587–594.
Casheekar A, Lahiri A, Rath K, et al., 2024, A Contemporary Review on Chatbots, AI-powered Virtual Conversational Agents, ChatGPT: Applications, Open Challenges and Future Research Directions. Computer Science Review, 2024(52): 100632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100632
Jean G, 2024, Mentorship Reimagined: Using AI-Powered Chatbots for Inclusive Mentoring. The Chronicle of Mentoring and Coaching Journal, 8(3): 189–195. https://doi.org/10.62935/4p5cxu
Neumann AT, Arndt T, Kobis L, et al., 2021, Chatbots as a Tool to Scale Mentoring Processes: Individually Supporting Self-Study in Higher Education [Brief Research Report]. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2021(4): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.668220