Do Green Bonds Enhance Corporate ESG Performance? Micro Data Analysis Based on Chinese Listed Companies
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Green bonds
ESG performance
Carbon peak and neutrality
Heterogeneity test

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v7i7.11661

Submitted : 2025-07-15
Accepted : 2025-07-30
Published : 2025-08-14

Abstract

This study researches the benefits of green bonds of Chinese listed enterprises in China and their ESG performance under the carbon peak and neutrality targets proposed in China, focusing on bond issuance scale, use of raised funds, bond maturity, post-issuance corporate profit, carbon dioxide emission reduction, and energy savings. Using panel data to investigate the economic drivers of the benefits of green bonds in Chinese listed enterprises through a panel data with a heterogeneity test. Our results reveal a positive relationship between green bonds and the ESG performance of the enterprises. That means the issuance of green bonds is beneficial to the ESG rating. At the same time, due to the differing nature of enterprises, the issuance of green bonds has different impacts on the enhancement of their ESG scores. Firms with weaker financing constraints experience greater benefits from issuing green bonds in terms of enhanced ESG scores, while enterprises with higher initial ESG scores tend to achieve even higher scores after issuing green bonds. The driving factors of the ESG performance benefits for Chinese listed enterprises are mainly the information disclosure, environmental benefits, and social responsibility. Research results may help Chinese listed enterprises to improve the benefits of green bonds and contribute effectively to the green transformations of enterprises.

References

Li Y, Yu C, Shi J, et al., 2023, How Does Green Bond Issuance Affect Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises. Energy Econ, 123: 106755.

Brammer S, Brooks C, Pavelin S, 2006, Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures. Financ Manage, 35: 97–116.

Nollet J, Filis G, Mitrokostas E, 2016, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: A Non-Linear and Disaggregated Approach. Econ Model, 52: 400–407.

Bedendo M, Nocera G, Siming L, 2023, Greening the Financial Sector: Evidence from Bank Green Bonds. J. Bus. Ethics, 188: 259–279.

Russo A, Mariani M, Caragnano A, 2021, Exploring the Determinants of Green Bond Issuance: Going Beyond the Long-Lasting Debate on Performance Consequences. Bus Strat Env, 30: 38–59.

Chen YJ, Sheu JB, 2009, Environmental-Regulation Pricing Strategies for Green Supply Chain Management. Transport. Res. Part E: Logist. Transport. Rev., 45(5): 667–677.

Xu L, Yang L, Li D, et al., 2023, Asymmetric Effects of Heterogeneous Environmental Standards on Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China. Energy Econ, 117: 106479.

Helmrich R, Jans R, van den Heuvel W, et al., 2015, The Economic Lot-Sizing Problem with an Emission Capacity Constraint. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 241(1): 50–62.

Bai Y, Ding X, Jiang L, 2024, Corporate Environmental Pictures Information Disclosure and Investor Market Reaction: A New Perspective from Large-Scale Pictures Feature Mining. J. Clean. Prod., 437: 140616.

Barrena Martínez J, López Fernández M, Romero Fernández PM, 2016, Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution through Institutional and Stakeholder Perspectives. Eur J Manag Bus Econ, 25: 8–14.

Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL, 2003, Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organ Stud, 24: 403–441.