China has made significant efforts to recruit and retain talented individuals to support the development of the country’s economy and society. This study focuses on talent introduction policies in two major Chinese cities: Guangzhou and Shenzhen. By comparing two similar policies through discourse analysis, the research finds that the Guangzhou Gathering Talent Plan places greater emphasis on cultivating high-end talent, whereas the Shenzhen Peacock Plan focuses more on talent recruitment. In addition, Guangzhou demonstrates a more decentralized, multi-level government power structure, in contrast with Shenzhen’s more vertical and centralized approach to talent management. These differences are attributed to the distinct geographical positions, historical backgrounds, and policy coverage of these two regions. This study recommends that further efforts be made to retain talent effectively following initial recruitment.
Miao L, Zheng J, Jean JA, et al., 2022, China’s International Talent Policy (ITP): The Changes and Driving Forces, 1978–2020. Journal of Contemporary China, 31(136): 644–661.
Shi X, Chen Y, Xia M, et al., 2022, Effects of the Talent War on Urban Innovation in China: A Difference-in-differences Analysis. Land, 11(9): 1485.
Shen Y, Li B, 2022, Policy Coordination in the Talent War to Achieve Economic Upgrading: The Case of Four Chinese Cities. Policy Studies, 43(3): 443–463.
Zhang H, Deng T, Wang M, et al., 2019, Content Analysis of Talent Policy on Promoting Sustainable Development of Talent: Taking Sichuan Province as an Example. Sustainability, 11(9): 2508.
Harvey WS, 2014, Winning the Global Talent War: A Policy Perspective. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 5(1): 62–74.
Ma JQ, Liu X, Wang HW, et al., 2019, The Effectiveness and Problems of Talent Policy Implementation in China: Taking Major Talent Project as an Example. 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1–7.
Hewitt S, 2009, Discourse Analysis and Public Policy Research. Center for Rural Economy Discussion Paper Series, 2009(24): 1–16.