Keywords
Family justice reform
Psychological counseling mechanism
Therapeutic jurisprudence
Submitted : 2025-03-04
Accepted : 2025-03-19
Published : 2025-04-03
Abstract
The therapeutic function of family justice is based on therapeutic jurisprudence theory, aiming to reduce the negative impact of family disputes and justice on the parties involved and achieve unity between individual happiness and family harmony. In China’s family justice practice, psychological counseling has become the primary means of achieving the therapeutic function of family justice. However, empirical research conducted in a grassroots court in City A of the southwestern region reveals several issues with the operation of the psychological intervention mechanism. These include low utilization and limited effectiveness of mental health services, difficulties in initiating psychological interventions, confusion regarding the role of psychological counseling techniques, unscientific methods, and a lack of a holistic family perspective. Therefore, China needs to expedite the establishment of family litigation law to provide legal protection for the psychological intervention mechanism. Simultaneously, it should strengthen the professional development of the family justice team, establish a scientific layered psychological intervention mechanism, and introduce psychological approaches such as family counseling to adjust family conflicts from a holistic perspective, enabling the smooth operation of the therapeutic function of family justice.
References
Babb BA, 1997, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Family Law Jurisprudence: Application of an Ecological and Therapeutic Perspective. Indiana Law Journal, 72(3): 775–808.
Babb BA, 2021, Family Law and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Caring Combination—Introduction to the July 2021 Special Issue of Family Court Review. Family Court Review, 59(3): 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12585
Xiang XD, 2016, Psychological Counseling Techniques and Applications. Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press, Shanghai, 4–13.
Huang AG, Du WD, Chen JG, 2006, Introduction to Lu Longguang’s Psychological Counseling Therapy. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 2006(2): 182–183. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2006.02.046
Liu M, 2024, On the Therapeutic Function of Family Justice. Hebei Law Science, 42(8): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.16494/j.cnki.1002-3933.2024.08.001
Salem P, 2014, The Challenges of Family Court Service Reform. Family Court Review, 52(4): 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12119
Chen RZ, Ma N, Wang YF, et al., 2024, Status of Psychological Treatment and Counseling Services in Mental Health Medical Institutions in Mainland China in 2020. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 40(8): 969–973.
Zhu ZZ, Zhang WW, Jin Q, et al., 2024, Construction of a Standardized and Systematic Management System for Psychological Service Institutions. Chinese Health Standard Management, 15(17): 70–73. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2024.17.017
Xu XL, 2024, After 6 Sessions of Psychological Counseling, She Finally Showed Her Long-Awaited Smile After Losing Her Spouse in Middle Age. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA3MTk1OTI1NA==&mid=2247678675&idx=1&sn=d853e4591de567ca3475a74cf345999d
Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court, 2018, Guidelines for Psychological Counseling and Intervention in Family Matters of the Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court (Trial Implementation). https://www.gzcourt.gov.cn/wjk/gzzd/2018/09/25105748740.html
Zhou J, 2010, Research on the Current Situation and Countermeasures of Psychological Counseling Services in Society, thesis, Southwest University.
Supreme People’s Court, 2018, Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Further Deepening the Reform of Family Trial Methods and Work Mechanisms (Trial Implementation). Gazette of the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. http://gongbao.court.gov.cn/Details/bf4b36ae2dee44d9773636f4656593.html
Yang ZX, 2024, Differentiated Role Positioning of People’s Courts in Grassroots Governance. Law and Social Development, 30(3): 50–66.
He X, Feng XC, 2008, The Routine Practice of Divorce Law: The Impact of Institutional Constraints on Judicial Behavior. Peking University Law Review, 9(2): 456–477.
Pollard R, 1997, The Dynamics of Relationships in Family Court Welfare Practice. Probation Journal, 44(3): 148–152.
Zhu LM, 2024, Research on Several Issues of Deepening the Professionalization and Standardization Reform of Family Trials. Chinese Applied Law, 2024(3): 105–114.
Zhang JY, 2020, Family-Oriented or Individual-Oriented? On the Legal Principle Reconstruction of Contemporary Chinese Family Law. Law and Social Development, 26(2): 137–149.
Lei WW, 2020, Innovations and Improvement Paths of the Divorce System in the Civil Code.” Financial and Economic Law Review, 2020(6): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.16823/j.cnki.10-1281/d.2020.06.005
Luo Q, 2023, Construction of a Therapeutic Family Justice System in China. Study of Law and Business, 40(2): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.16390/j.cnki.issn1672-0393.2023.02.006