Research on the Integration Training Model of Industry, Education, and Research and the Construction of Platforms for Transportationrelated Postgraduate Students
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Transportation-related
Integration of industry, education, and research
Platform construction
Model connotation
Operation mechanism

DOI

10.26689/erd.v7i6.11020

Submitted : 2025-06-07
Accepted : 2025-06-22
Published : 2025-07-07

Abstract

This article focuses on the training of transportation-related postgraduate students. It analyzes the deficiencies of the current training model, expounds on the importance and connotation of the integration training model of industry, education, and research. It also deeply explores how to construct an integration training platform of industry, education, and research, including the platform construction principles, operation mechanisms, and practical cases. Through the evaluation of practical effects, it verifies the positive role of this model in enhancing postgraduate students’ professional qualities, innovation abilities, and practical abilities, providing a reference for the reform of postgraduate education in the transportation field.

References

Liu W, Dong J, 2016, Exploration and Practice of the “Industry–Education–Research” Cooperative Training Model for Postgraduate Students: A Case Study of the Transportation Engineering Major at University of Shanghai for Science and Technology. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 38(3): 276–280.

Deng W, Cai D, 2024, Research on the Construction Path of Rail Transit Comprehensive Training Base Based on Industry–Education Integration. Times Automotive, 2024(22): 38–40.

Pan Y, Ma J, Tang W, 2024, Exploration and Practice of the Integration of Industry and Education Talent Training Model in Transportation Engineering. China Education Technology Equipment, 2024(9): 146–149.

Liu G, 2020, Research on the Reform Path of Practical Teaching System in Transportation Engineering. Jushe, 2020(7): 189.

Wu J, Sun Y, Huang S, 2013, Research on the Reform of Practical Teaching in Transportation Engineering. Education and Teaching Forum, 2013(40): 36–37.

Huang Y, Zeng L, Zhao S, 2015, Research on the Reform Path of Practical Teaching System in Transportation Engineering. Heilongjiang Education (Higher Education Research and Evaluation), 2015(6): 6–7.

Li Y, Yao S, Peng Y et al., 2025, Exploration of Multidimensional Whole Process Cultivation for Engineering Graduate Students in the New Era. Journal of Higher Education, 11(5): 153–156.

Du Y, 2024, Research on Innovative Ways for Information Technology to Assist Transportation Engineering Supervision Work. Smart City, 10(9): 90–92.

Liu C, Xie Y, 2024, Research on the Cultivation of Data Analysis Ability for Graduate Students Majoring in Transportation Engineering Based on “Promoting Learning Through Competition and Promoting Application Through Learning”. Journal of Higher Education, 10(19): 88–91.

Liu D, Li Y, Zeng X, 2024, Research on the Reform of Engineering Practice Ability Evaluation for Undergraduate Students in Higher Engineering Education. Applied Higher Education Research, 9(4): 28–33.

Long Z, Xie H, Shi M, 2024, Construction of Control Discipline Practice System to Improve Graduate Students’ Innovation Ability. Laboratory Research and Exploration, 43(3): 194–198.

Hu Q, Wu H, Jia S et al., 2018, Exploration of Graduate Education Model Based on Cooperation Between Local Universities and Enterprises. Sichuan Architecture, 38(1): 247–249.

Cao G, 2022, Exploration of the Linkage Mechanism Between Joint Training of Graduate Students’ Party Building and Employment Work. Education and Teaching Forum, 2022(51): 17–20.

Shao J, Xiao M, 2024, Traffic Signal Control Algorithm Based on Context Multi Arm Gambling Machine. Computer System Application, 33(10): 183–189.

Guo Y, Wang X, Ding Q, 2024, Research on Multi–Dimensional Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Practical Innovation Ability of Professional and Master’s Students. Modern Business and Industry, 45(22): 78–80.