An Emergency Plan Selection Method for Emergency Latency
Download PDF

Keywords

Emergency
Latency period
Linguistic terms
Information entropy

DOI

10.26689/pbes.v7i1.6072

Submitted : 2024-01-26
Accepted : 2024-02-10
Published : 2024-02-25

Abstract

Drawing upon a characteristic analysis of the latency period in emergencies, this paper proposes an emergency plan selection method based on interval language variables and information entropy to address the challenge of acquiring critical information during this crucial stage. Initially, decision-makers employ interval language variables to express the preference information regarding emergency plans, while also introducing an enhanced information entropy theory to derive the weight coefficients of key indicators. Subsequently, the weighted arithmetic average operator of interval language is applied twice to aggregate the preference information alongside the relative importance of decision-makers and the weight coefficients of key indicators. Finally, the ranking coefficients of each emergency plan are sorted to determine the optimal scheme. The feasibility and effectiveness of this method are demonstrated through a case study involving the selection of an emergency plan for a flood disaster in a specific location.

References

Abdulla MB, Costa AL, Sousa RL, 2018, Probabilistic Identification of Subsurface Gypsum Geohazards Using Artificial Neural Networks. Neural Computing and Applications, 29: 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2655-3

Zhang L, Chettupuzha AAJ, Chen H, et al., 2017, Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Enabled Root Cause Analysis in Complex Projects. Applied Soft Computing, 57(C): 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.020

Kabir G, Tesfamariam S, Francisque A, et al., 2015, Evaluating Risk of Water Mains Failure Using a Bayesian Belief Network Model. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1): 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.033

Namazian A, Yakhchali SH, 2018, Modified Bayesian Network-Based Risk Analysis of Construction Projects: Case Study of South Pars Gas Field Development Projects. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 4(4): 0000997. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000997

Zhang G, Thai VV, Yuen KF, et al., 2018, Addressing the Epistemic Uncertainty in Maritime Accidents Modelling Using Bayesian Network with Interval Probabilities. Safety Science, 102: 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.016

Cheng M, Lu Y, 2015, Developing a Risk Assessment Method for Complex Pipe Jacking Construction Projects. Automation in Construction, 58: 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.011

Sättele M, Bründl M, Straub D, 2015, Reliability and Effectiveness of Early Warning Systems for Natural Hazards: Concept and Application to Debris Flow Warning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 142: 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.003