Research on Rural Highway Project Construction Management and Maintenance
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Highway construction
Cost management
Activity-based costing
Highway maintenance

DOI

10.26689/pbes.v4i4.2422

Submitted : 2021-07-31
Accepted : 2021-08-15
Published : 2021-08-30

Abstract

In this paper, combined with an actual case project, activity-based costing is used to analyze the labor costs, material costs, and the corresponding indirect costs (such as site management fees and taxes) where each cost is analyzed in detailed. Through quantitative comparison, it further determines which business activities are the key cost control objects and proposes targeted implementation plans for actual cost management in the future in order to provide new ideas for improving the implementation efficiency in addition to a reasonable cost control of highway engineering projects. At the same time, through analyzing the situation of highways, different maintenance modes are compared to put forward a more perfect rural road maintenance and management mode.

References

Du X, Xu Z, Sheng W, 2009, Improved Ammoniacal-Nitrogen Removal in Non-Planted Vertical Flow-Constructed Wetland System by Natural Oxygen Transfer. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, (10): 1846-50.

Loredo J, Soto J, Ordonez A, et al., 2009, Mercury and Arsenic Pollution Associated to Artisanal Gold Mining in Huanca (Ayacucho Department, Peru). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, (4): 391-8.

Porter G, 1995, The Impact of Road Construction on Women’s Trade in Rural Nigeria. Journal of Transport Geography, (1): 3-14.

Haans J, Westerveld G, 1975, The Application of Soil Survey in the Netherlands. Geoderma, (3): 279-309.

Achour R, Abriak NE, Zentar R, et al., 2014, Valorization of Unauthorized Sea Disposal Dredged Sediments as a Road Foundation Material. Environmental Technology, (13-14): 1997-2007.

Makarachi GA, Tillotson HT, 1992, Road Planning in Rural Areas of Developing Countries. European Journal of Operational Research, (3): 279-87.