Against the backdrop of stock competition and severe hardware homogenization in China’s smartphone market, hardware parameter iteration can no longer effectively stimulate consumer replacement demand, while product aesthetic value has become a core driver of brand differentiation and consumer repurchase behavior. This study adopts a quantitative research method based on the three-dimensional theoretical framework of product aesthetic value (image connotation beauty, modeling sense beauty, and functional experience beauty). Taking 385 H-brand smartphone consumers in Nanning (a typical western non-first-tier central city) as research samples, this study explores the influence mechanism of multi-dimensional product aesthetic value on consumer repurchase intention through descriptive statistics and regression analysis. The results indicate that the overall product aesthetic value and its three sub-dimensions all exert significant positive effects on repurchase intention. In terms of influence weight, modeling sense beauty ranks first (β = 0.311), followed by functional experience beauty (β = 0.308) and image connotation beauty (β = 0.290). This study fills the research gap in aesthetic value research in non-first-tier smartphone markets, provides empirical support for the aesthetic-driven transformation of the domestic high-end mobile phone industry, and offers targeted optimization suggestions for brand product design and market operation.
CAICT, 2024, China Smartphone Market Operation Data Report 2024, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, Beijing.
iiMedia Research, 2024, 2024 China Smartphone Consumer Replacement Cycle Survey Report, https://www.163.com/dy/article/JA1BI70C0511A1Q1.html
Böhme G, 2014, The Aesthetic Economy of the Creative Industries: The Extension of Cultural and Creative Industry Chains in the Era of Aesthetic Economy. Cultural and Tourism Research, (12): 15–21.
Wu XP, 2016, Influencing Factors of High-End Mobile Phone Consumption Behavior in China: A Grounded Theory Approach. East China Economic Management, 30(12): 109–113.
Bloch PH, 1995, Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3): 16–29.
Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL, 2005, The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1): 63–81.
MA HY, 2019, Research on Product Aesthetic Value and Design Innovation Dimensions. Packaging Engineering, 40(22): 102–106.
Filieri R, Lin Z, Li H, 2017, The Role of Aesthetic, Cultural, Utilitarian and Branding Factors in Young Chinese Consumers’ Repurchase Intention of Smartphone Brands. Computers in Human Behavior, 67: 210–220.
Oliver RL, 1999, Whence Consumer Loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(SI): 33–44.
Hagedorn L, Piller FT, 2020, Strengthening Aesthetic Individualization in Product Design to Enhance Customer Loyalty and Sustainability, Marcus A, Wang W, eds. Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Philosophy and Theory. Cham: Springer, 2020: 327–341.
Ding N, Li T, 2022, City Size and Household Consumption Upgrading in China: A Dual Perspective Based on Consumption Structure and Preference. China Industrial Economics, (5): 134–152.
Clay R, 2009, Beautiful Thing, Berg Publishers, Oxford.
Liu F, Zhang W, Li M, 2022, The Formation Mechanism of Repurchase Intention under Local Consumption Scenarios. Journal of Management, 19(5): 78–89.
Landwehr JR, Wentzel D, Herrmann A, 2013, Product Design for the Long Run: Consumer Responses to Typical and Atypical Designs at Different Stages of Exposure. Journal of Marketing, 77(5): 89–104.