Keywords
Distribution of surplus value
Marx’s theory of labor justice
Data ownership
Algorithmic exploitation
Distributive justice
Submitted : 2026-06-16
Accepted : 2026-07-01
Published : 2026-07-16
Abstract
As an emerging mode of production, the distribution of surplus value created by digital labor is an important component of current capitalist production relations. This process highlights the profound inequality in the production process. Platform companies utilize their digital intermediary roles to enable digital capital to effectively control digital labor through big data, algorithm rules, and platform rules. Innovated the way of obtaining surplus value. Causing problems such as exploitation, objectification, and lack of protection for digital workers in their labor. This article revolves around Marx’s perspective on labor justice theory. Explored the unfair phenomena in the distribution of surplus value of digital labor. Proposed optimization strategies for resetting the justice of digital labor surplus value distribution from four dimensions: institutional, technological, organizational, and cultural. To achieve justice in the distribution of surplus value of digital labor, it is necessary to be guided by the Marxist concept of labor justice. Through institutional restructuring and technological ethical regulation, the relationship between surplus value distribution can be transformed. On this basis, build a benefit-sharing mechanism that is conducive to the win-win situation of workers, platforms, and society.
References
Ding BJ, 2026, The Contemporary Value of Marx’s Theory of Surplus Value. Marxism Studies, (02): 1–16 + 178. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3591.A.20260319.1044.004
Yang HY, 2026, How Capital Achieves Dominance Over the Unpaid Labor of Others: On the Roots and Foundation of Capital Logic in Capital. Seeker (Qiusuo): (02): 48–56.
Zhao GC, Ma XY, 2026, A New Understanding of Digital Labor from the Perspective of Marx’s Labor Theory of Value. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities and Social Sciences), 1–9.
Zhao B, 2026, How Does the Generation Mechanism of Surplus Value Become “Digitalized”? A Critical Review Based on Marx’s Theory of Surplus Value. Journal of Nanjing Social Sciences, (02): 24–33. https://doi.org/10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2026.02.003
Song XW, Cui BM, Gong TY, 2026, Marx’s Theory of Value Transformation: Interpretation of Meaning and Mathematical Analysis. Political Economy Quarterly, 1–26. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/10.1809.F.20260211.1011.002
Xu MY, Lu YK, 2025, Contemporary Reflections on the Productivity of Labor under Digital Capitalism: An Analysis Based on Marx’s Theory of Productive Labor. Contemporary Economic Research, (12): 40–49.
Xu YT, Kou Y, 2025, Rethinking Marx’s Labor Theory of Value in the Context of Artificial Intelligence. Yuanliu, (23): 117–119. https://doi.org/10.26982/j.cnki.yl.2025.23.003
Zhang BB, 2026, Research on Marx’s “Fragment on Machines”: An Investigation Based on its Theoretical Status. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2025.1450
Zhu TY, 2025, Ethical Risks of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Marx’s “Surplus.” Journal of Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (06): 52–65.
Zhang WX, 2025, Interpretation of the Law of Identity Between Labor and Ownership in Marx. Shandong Social Sciences, (11): 5–18 + 87. https://doi.org/10.14112/j.cnki.37-1053/c.2025.11.003
Qin T, Zhang L, 2025, From Capital to Cloud Capital: Varoufakis’s Misreading of Marx’s Concept of Capital. Contemporary Critical Marxism, (04): 88–109.
Zheng SZ, Liu XH, 2025, A Marxist Political Economy Analysis of Effectively Governing Digital Capital from the Perspective of Alienation Theory. Research on Economic Development, (04): 20–31.
Li J, Xie R, 2025, Marx’s Theory of the “Collective Worker” and Its Refutation Of the “Useless Class Theory.” Journal of China University of Labor Relations, 39(05): 10–18.
Wu YO, 2025, Rethinking Marx’s Critique of the Fetishism of Income: Based on the Method of Formal Analysis. Contemporary Critical Marxism, (03): 166–181.
Wei LP, Liu KX, 2025, Research on the Exploitation Mechanism of Surplus Value in “playbor” from the Perspective of Marx’s Productive Labor. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 26(05): 1–15.
Xia W, Zhang CY, 2025, Contemporary Reconstruction and Theoretical Deviation of Marx’s Critique of Exploitation: A Critical Investigation Based on Hardt and Negri’s Theory of “Common” Exploitation. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), (05): 80–90.
Yu MM, Ji D, 2025, Digital Reconstruction of the Surplus Value Exploitation Process by Algorithmic Technology: A Study Based on Marxist Surplus Value Theory. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, 46(05): 114–122. https://doi.org/10.14137/j.cnki.issn1003-5281.2025.05.014
Gao YP, 2025, Logical Framework and Intrinsic Connection Between Marx’s Labor Theory of Value and Surplus Value Theory. The Delta, (24): 223–225.
Jian XH, Nie CF, 2025, Innovation and Development of Capital Theory under the Conditions of a Socialist Market Economy. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business, 46(05): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14178/j.cnki.issn1007-2101.20250828.001
Central Committee of the Communist Party of China State Council, 2022, Opinions on Building Foundational Data Systems to Better Leverage the Role of Data Elements.
National Data Bureau et al, 2023, Three-Year Action Plan for “Data Element ×” (2024–2026).
Wang LM, 2022, On Data Rights and Interests: From the Perspective of a “Bundle of Rights.” Politics and Law, (07).
Hu L, 2022, The Formation of Property Rights in Data Elements: From Legal Structure to Market Structure. Eastern Forum of Law, (02).
Yang HT, Tang Y, 2024, Data elements of New Quality Productive Forces: Characteristics and Suitable Institutional Foundations. Journal of Chinese Characteristics Socialism Studies, (04).
Zhang XB, Cao QZ, 2023, Research on the Legal Mechanism of Rights Confirmation and Authorization for Public Data. Journal of Comparative Law, (03).
Ye XH, 2024, The Logical Expansion and Rule of Law Approach of Public Data Authorized Operation Empowering New Quality Productive Forces. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), (06).