As global trade governance increasingly incorporates environmental standards, mechanisms such as the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) create growing compliance pressures and cost burdens for China’s manufacturing sector. This study examines the transmission mechanisms through which green trade barriers (GTBs) affect firm-level innovation and competitiveness. The analysis identifies several structural constraints that may limit the effectiveness of innovation-based adaptation: an energy system constraint associated with the high carbon intensity of the national power grid; a resource-allocation dilemma in which short-term compliance costs may reduce long-term R&D investment; disparities in carbon accounting and digital capabilities; and a strategic tendency toward product-level compliance rather than deeper process-oriented decarbonization. In response to these constraints, this study proposes an implementation framework structured around an Actor–Tool–Timeline matrix. Policy recommendations include promoting green power trading through reforms in energy-use allocation, expanding transition finance to ease adjustment pressures on SMEs, and developing public digital platforms for carbon verification. Furthermore, the study argues that sustained long-term competitiveness depends on stronger indigenous innovation capacity and greater participation in international rule-making, while drawing on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) to respond to emerging forms of environmentally driven trade restriction.
Guo Y, 2024, Green Trade Barriers under the Developing Country Perspective. Future Human Image, 2024(21): 4–15.
Zhu J, Zhao Y, Zheng L, 2024, The Impact of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on China’s Exports to the EU. Energies, 17(2): 509.
Cui T, Wei W, Huangfu J, 2025, Climate Policy Uncertainty and Green Technology Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship? Sustainability, 17(17): 7986.
Xue S, Qian J, Fang J, 2025, Research on the Evolutionary Game Theory of Green Technological Innovation in Construction Companies under the “Dual Carbon” Objectives. Buildings, 15(21): 3826.
Tang J, Xiao X, Han M, et al., 2024, China’s Sustainable Energy Transition Path to Low-Carbon Renewable Infrastructure Manufacturing under Green Trade Barriers, 16(8): 3387.
Lee K, Min B, 2015, Green R&D for Eco-Innovation and its Impact on Carbon Emissions and Firm Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015(108): 534–542.
Porter M, Linde C, 1995, Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 97–118.
Hu Y, Sun S, Dai Y, 2021, Environmental Regulation, Green Innovation, and International Competitiveness of Manufacturing Enterprises in China: From the Perspective of Heterogeneous Regulatory Tools. PLoS ONE, 16(3): e0249169.
Ghisetti C, Mancinelli S, Mazzanti M, et al., 2017, Financial Barriers and Environmental Innovations: Evidence from EU Manufacturing Firms. Climate Policy, 17(sup1): S131–S147.
Scarpellini S, Marín-Vinuesa L, Portillo-Tarragona P, et al., 2018, Defining and Measuring Different Dimensions of Financial Resources for Business Eco-Innovation and the Influence of the Firms’ Capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018(204): 258–269.
Wang J, Wei L, 2025, Shift One’s Trouble to Others: Does Climate Policy Uncertainty Promote Enterprises’ “Pollution Migration” in the Context of Artificial Intelligence? Frontiers in Public Health, 2025(13): 1578139.
Pernet T, Maurel M, Ruili Z, 2025, Internal Finance, Financial Constraint, and Pollution Emissions: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 2025: 102525.
Pham T, Nguyen N, Le P, et al., 2023, An Investigation of Barriers to Adopt Green Innovation among Manufacturing Organizations in Vietnam. KnE Social Sciences, 8(20) : 521–554.
Xinhua News, 2020, Full Text of Xi’s statement at the General Debate of the 75th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China, September 23, 2020.
Liu J, Wang T, Wang Y, et al., 2025, China’s 1+ N Policy System Supports an Earlier Peak in Carbon Emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025(215): 115626.
Jia J, 2025, 5th Anniversary of the Proposal of “Dual Carbon” Goals: China’s Development Becomes Greener, China Youth Daily, August 19, 2025.
Ahmad I, 2025, Review of Content Analysis of EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Concerning Consistency with WTO. International Journal of Law and Legal Advancement, 1(1).
Li M, 2025, The Impact of Green Technical Barriers to Trade on Green Innovation Strategies of Chinese Exporting Companies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2025: 104722.
Wang L, Wen Y, Zhang Y, 2025, The Impact of EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on China’s Export and its Countermeasures. Global Energy Interconnection, 8(2): 205–212.
Tian B, Pan C, Xing Y, et al., 2024, Analysis of Production Decision-Making Evolution of Steel Enterprises under Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Heliyon, 10(13).
Ambec S, Barla P, 2002, A Theoretical Foundation of the Porter Hypothesis. Economics Letters, 75(3): 355–360.
Li Z, Liao G, Wang Z, et al., 2018, Green Loan and Subsidy for Promoting Clean Production Innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018(187): 421–431.
Krishnan A, De Marchi V, Ponte S, 2023, Environmental Upgrading and Downgrading in Global Value Chains: A Framework for Analysis. Economic Geography, 99(1): 25–50.