The Hidden Costs of the Generative AI Boom: How Overinvestment Exacerbates the Digital Divide in Developing Countries
Download PDF

Keywords

Generative artificial intelligence
Digital divide
Developing countries
Technology policy
Resource mismatch

DOI

10.26689/pbes.v9i2.14120

Submitted : 2026-02-09
Accepted : 2026-02-24
Published : 2026-03-11

Abstract

Between 2024 and 2025, a global investment frenzy in generative artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged, with governments and enterprises worldwide competing to deploy large language models, AI chips, and intelligent applications. However, in developing countries with limited resources, such a “technological leapfrogging” strategy may entail severe structural risks. This paper argues that blind pursuit of cutting-edge AI not only diverts investment from critical basic digital infrastructure (including broadband networks, power supply, and digital literacy education) but also risks widening the digital divide across urban-rural, regional, and social groups. By analyzing policy practices and practical dilemmas in India, Vietnam, selected African nations, and central and western regions of China, this study reveals that the lack of a technology strategy aligned with developmental stages can easily lead to a dual predicament: “underutilization of advanced technologies” coexisting with “collapse of basic capabilities”. The paper advocates for a “stratified AI strategy”, prioritizing the consolidation of digital foundations before selectively developing lightweight or high social-return AI applications, to achieve inclusive technological progress.

References

McKinsey Global Institute, 2023, The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier, McKinsey & Company.

International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2024, Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. SDN/2024/001).

World Bank Group, 2023, Digital Progress and Trends Report 2023, World Bank.

Perez C, 2002, Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, 2018, Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence, Harvard Business Review Press.

Schumacher E, 1973, Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered, Blond & Briggs.

Lall S, 1992, Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. World Development, 20(2): 165–186.

Wang C, Boerman S, Kroon A, et al., 2025, The Artificial Intelligence Divide: Who is the Most Vulnerable? New Media & Society, 27(7): 3867–3889.

Mienye I, Sun Y, Ileberi E, 2024, Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Development in Africa: A Comprehensive Review. Machine Learning with Applications, 2024(18): 100591.

Furman J, Seamans R, 2019, AI and the Economy. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2019(19): 161–191.

European Commission, 2024, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and Amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act), Official Journal of the European Union.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2021, Technology and Innovation Report 2021: Catching Technological Waves, United Nations.

Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A, 2014, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, W. W. Norton & Company.

Bonk C, 2009, The World Is Open: How Web Technology Is Revolutionizing Education, Jossey-Bass.

World Economic Forum (WEF), 2024, Global Risks Report 2024, World Economic Forum.