TR Equipment Manufacturing Enterprise Technology Innovation Performance Evaluation
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Equipment manufacturing industry
Innovation performance
Data envelopment analysis

DOI

10.26689/pbes.v8i2.10199

Submitted : 2025-03-25
Accepted : 2025-04-09
Published : 2025-04-24

Abstract

The correct evaluation of enterprise technological innovation performance is the premise and foundation to improve the efficiency of enterprise innovation. This paper first puts forward the index system of enterprise technological innovation performance evaluation, then establishes the model of technological innovation performance evaluation, explores the quantitative evaluation of enterprise innovation performance by using the DEA method, and finally makes an empirical study on the technological innovation performance of the TR enterprise.

References

Hong X, Wang Y, 2016, Evaluation Index System of Corporation’s Innovation Capacity and Application Study. Technology and Investment, (7): 143–151.

Sun X, 2018, Construction of the Evaluation Index System for Innovation Ability of Regional Science and Technology in China. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 9(4): 1–10.

Sun L, 2017, Ecological-Economic Efficiency Evaluation of Green Technology Innovation in Strategic Emerging Industries based on Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Method. Ecological Indicators, (73): 554–558.

Sun H, 2022, Evaluation Index System of Innovation Catalytic Capacity of Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises in Liaoning Province. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management, 5(1): 43–48.

Zhang Y, 2014, Research on the Evaluation Method of Regional Innovation Capability. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 6(6): 243–257.

Li Q, 2018, Grey Language Evaluation Method for Technology-management Coupling Innovation. Journal of Linyi University, 40(2): 111–117.

Zhang X, 2020, Evaluation of Equipment Procurement Technology Innovation based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Ordnance Automation, 39(11): 53–57.