This paper presents a study on the design strategy of leaning-type arch bridges. The main characteristics of leaning-type arch bridges are first introduced; Kunshan Yufeng Bridge is taken as an example to discuss different aspects of a design strategy, which includes self-system optimization, selection of beam length and bridge deck position, and other aspects. This paper can be used as a reference to further improve and develop bridge design.
Ai L, Zeng L, 2021, Discussion on Key Structure Design of Bridges with Beam-Arch Composite System. Traffic World (First Ten-day Issue), 2021(11):45–46.
Yuan L, 2021, Sensitivity Analysis of Natural Frequency Parameters of Bridges with Girder-arch Composite System. Tianjin Construction Technology, 31(4): 12–15.
Liu J, 2021, Research on Thrust Performance of Arch Rib Top of Long-Span Beam-Arch Composite Bridge. Highway, 66(4): 176–181.
Li Y, Yang P, Zhou X, et al., 2022, Mechanical Behavior Analysis of Cantilever Construction of Chord-Arch Beam Under Long-Span Beam-Arch Composite Rigid Frame Bridge. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition), 41(8): 79–87 + 111.
Shangguan B, Hu H, Zhao J, et al., 2022, Key Technologies for Structural System Design of Guangzhou Pearl Bay Bridge. Bridge Construction, 52(4): 1–7.
Zheng H, Hao X, Qiao J, et al., 2021, Analysis of Factors Affecting Long-Term Deformation of Long-Span Continuous Beam-Arch Composite Bridges on Ballastless Track. Railway Survey, 47(3): 97–102.
Wei P, 2021, Research on Simplified Method of Bridge Structure Analysis Based on Variational Principle, dissertation, Zhejiang University.
Li C, Liu Y, 2022, Case Analysis of Beam-Arch Composite System Arch Bridge Inspection Before Reconstruction. Traffic World (Early Journal), 2022(9):103–105 + 129.
Han M, Design Analysis of Bridges with Reclining Beam-Arch Composite System. Traffic World, 2022(34): 105–107.
Li Y, Sun H, Xiao R, 2021, The Determination and Adjustment of the Tension Force of the Suspender of the Reclining Beam-arch Combination System Bridge. Urban Architecture, 18(13): 183–185.