To improve the seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures with insufficient lateral resistance, this study investigates the influence of different buckling-restrained brace (BRB) arrangements on a typical five-story, 4 × 4 bay regular RC frame. Based on the original benchmark model, four retrofit schemes were developed by considering two brace forms, namely single diagonal and chevron braces, and two planar locations, namely mid-bay and end-bay arrangements. Five numerical models, including one unstrengthened structure and four BRB-retrofitted structures, were established in SAP2000 V26 for nonlinear static pushover analysis. Geometric and material nonlinearities were incorporated to simulate the inelastic behavior of beams, columns, and BRBs. Pushover analyses were conducted under uniform and inverted triangular lateral load distributions to evaluate the global seismic performance of the structure. The results indicate that all retrofit schemes significantly enhanced the base shear capacity and deformation capacity of the original frame. Under the uniform load pattern, the maximum base shear capacities of the four strengthened models increased by 295%, 148%, 145%, and 148%, respectively, relative to the original structure. Under the inverted triangular load pattern, the corresponding increases were 232%, 128%, 124%, and 127%, respectively. Among the investigated configurations, the mid-bay single diagonal brace arrangement achieved the most effective improvement in lateral resistance and was identified as the optimal retrofit scheme. These findings demonstrate that mid-bay BRB placement is more effective than end-bay placement for enhancing the seismic performance of regular RC frame structures.
Bolt B, 2004, Seismic Input Motions for Nonlinear Structural Analysis. ISET J Earthquake Technol, 2004(41): 223–32.
Liao W, Loh C, Wan S, 2001, Earthquake Responses of RC Moment Frames Subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motions. Struct Des Tall Build, 10(3): 219–29.
Mazza F, Vulcano A, 2010, Nonlinear Dynamic Response of R.C. Framed Structures Subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motions. Bull Earthq Eng, 8(6): 1331–50.
Wani F, 2023, Influence of Near-Fault Ground Motion Characteristics and the Relative Geographical Positioning of Sites on the Seismic Response Of RC Structures. International Journal of Structural Integrity, 14(4): 600–628.
Black C, Mskris N, Aiken I, 2004, Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces. J Struct Eng, 130(6): 880–94.
Uang C, Nakashima M, Tsai K, 2004, Research and Application of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames. Eng Struct, 26(3): 301–13.
Tasi K, Tasi Z, 2005, Pseudo Dynamic Tests and Analysis of a Full Scale Two-Story Steel Buckling-Restrained Braced Substructure under Bi-Directional: NCREE-05-016. Taipei China: National Taiwan University, 2005.
Kim J, Seo Y, 2004, Seismic Design of Low-Rise Steel Frames with Buckling-Restrained Braces. Eng Struct, 26(5): 543–51.
Black C, Makris N, Aiken I, 2004, Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(6): 880–894.
Tremblay R, Bolduc P, Neville R, et al., 2006, Seismic Testing and Performance of Buckling-Restrained Bracing Systems. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(2): 183–198.
Fajfar P, 2000, A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design. Earthquake Spectra, 16(3): 573–592.
FEMA 356, 2000, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
Computers and Structures, Inc, 2023, SAP2000 Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design: Analysis Reference Manual, CSI, Berkeley, CA.
Mander J, Priestley M, Park R, 1988, Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8): 1804–1826.
ATC-40, 1996, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
FEMA 356, 2000, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
Chopra A, Goel R, 2002, A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure to Estimate Seismic Demands for Buildings: Theory and Preliminary Evaluation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3): 561–582.
Mwafy A, Elnashai A, 2001, Static Pushover Versus Dynamic Collapse Analysis of RC Buildings. Engineering Structures, 23(4): 407–424.
ASCE/SEI 41-17, 2017, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
Black C, Makris N, Aiken I, 2004, Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(6): 880–894.